The Great American Circus

MONEY AND DEMONSTRATIONS

2011-10-15T22:47:00.000-07:00

There may be a tie-in between the "Arab Spring" and the "Wall Street Camp-In," as the dialectic is still favored by Pan-Western Marxist. The leading Bilderberger group is still pressing for a meaningful world government. To be meaningful, such a government must issue its own money through a central bank. It must also be able to tax the people of the world. To be a successful tax-gathering government, it would need a group of "break-legs" to enforce the tax code. Therefore, the world government must have broad police powers. Just in case of revolt among the soon -to-be oppressed people, it would also need a military force.

Now, there are a phalanx of comrade associations to the Bilderbergers, but for convenience sake, I will let them stand for all the Western "liberal" elite.

Since debt is the only way a minority can control the teeming masses, the money issued by the new world government would be based on debt. The central bank would be privately held by unidentifiable owners. Its ledgers would not be available for public inspection. The world government would request a certain amount of money from the central bank, and the central bank would readily agree, but it would insist on collateral. The world government would agree and issue bonds, guaranteed by the labor of the citizens of the world government. A potential slave state is at once engendered. The elite get richer as they engineer "boom & bust" cycles.

Let us awaken from this "paradisial dream" of the elites for a moment.

I believe that it is apparent to the Bilderberger group that they can create the conditions for their dream becoming true by dragging out and even worsening the depressed economies of the world. In this scheme economists and other experts would testify that the problem is caused by the passe' system of national central banks and national economies. The stage of nation-states has been outgrown by global economic evolution, yet still remains perversely to thwart human potential.

The solution? We must shed the old skin of the nation-man so as to become our destined global-man. We must have world government. [See above for key aspects.]

If you listen to the complaints of the demonstrators at Wall Street, then you will not hear much meaningful commentary. Statements of personal hardships don't speak to the problem. To inveigh against "bank greed" or "corporate greed" will not meet the needs of the times. To announce that the whole economic system needs to be changed, however generally correct, does not address the specific need of our time.

We should maintain our national system. However, money creation and banking should be significantly changed. Using the United States as a stand-in for all nations, the United States should immediately establish its own national bank - The United States Bank, N.A. This bank would provide a checking account for each citizen. There would be no savings accounts or debt instruments issues by the government. ATMs for this bank would be readily available. Using Eminent Domain power, existing private banking facilities may be co-opted initially to house the national bank. All national payments would be made through these bank facilities.

The money for the nation would be created at a specially established unit within the Department of the Treasury. Parameters would be established for a proper sum of currency for the U.S. population and productivity. Treasury would direct the Bureau of the Mint to create the dollars in the form of interest-free Treasury Notes. These moneys would be used to pay federal workers and contractors for services rendered. They would be used to pay Social Security and Medicare, etc. Other money would be created to buy assets such as new highways, bridges, dams, etc. or to improve existing assets in the forms of highways, bridges, dams, etc.

Nationally owned, or newly purchased, assets would be accounted in the nation's books as assets. When the United States spent money to acquire these assets, it would be getting richer. The idea of government wasteful spending would be converted to wealth-building. The government would invest through its banks in housing for employed citizens, buying a house for a goven citizen and then renting-to-own the property to the contracting citizen. The house would be an asset for the government, which over time would be transferred to the citizen at the agreed to cost of purchase. Of course, there would be no interest charged the citizen.

The same principle should apply to government investing through its bank in likely small businesses. Newly designed and engineered electric cars might be developed by entrepreneurs, which the government might invest in, after careful consideration. I don't believe that any international corporation should be invested in. In fact, domestic only companies shoulds pay no tax at all.

Nor would there be any income tax. Excise taxes would be available for user fees, as in highways. Each vehicle would carry a shield which could be recognized by laser, or other beam, attached to "toll poles" placed along the highways , bridges, etc. Usage fees would automatically be withdrawn from the owners checking account and transferred to the government account.

The same principle might apply to dry goods, foods, clothing, etc. I don't believe that basic food such as bread and milk should be taxed.

Further, as part of the government's duty to regulate commerce, it should "make a market" in all commodities at slight mark-ups. Each farmer, herder, lumberman, miner, etc., would get a guaranteed fair price. Entrepreneurs requiring raw materials to construct or prepare a product would buy the goods from the government storage depots, which would be established in all sections of the country.

The goverrnment should also operate the utilities, unless the states choose to operate one or more. However, in all cases the national government would operate nuclear facilities. It would require each existent and all new plants to be "fail-safe" - rather than based on budget or profit considerations. Only the government has the money to see that the work is done correctly. These would be assets. Fees would be charged for electricity from nuclear energy.

New highways would be built with the idea of taking advantage of this nuclear energy capacity by establishing lighted highways, well-conceived oases for rest, food and either recharging electric vehicles or swapping them at rental agencies, which the government might choose to operate, etc.

There is much of an absolutely booming sort that can be done. Never again need people suffer from "booms and busts," as the national money could not implode. Well managed, it would never explode either. However, it would annihilate the $14 trillion dollars in debt of the U.S. in reasonably short time. Wall Street would be needed no more.

Tariffs would be imposed upon all products foreign interests and international corporations desired to sell in the United States. The tariffs would be calculated to offset wage differentials betwen the U.S. and another country, such as China. These funds might be earmarked for the Social Security/Medicare requirements. Incidentally, no longer would Social Security funds be placed in the general revenue account and spent like ordinary tax revenue. These funds would be protected from Congress by law.

All trade treaties/agreements would be nullified. The U.S. would treat every foreign state equally, but it would never treat one as if it were a member of the national Union.

A new "foreign dollar" based on commodities would be created to deal with our trading partners.

All American troops would be returned to the U.S.A. Foreign nations wanting to rent U.S. military units could do so, based on carefully designed rules. These would be voluntary mercenary units drawn from within the U.S. military and the National Guard. [Optional aspect of the renewed American economy].

This outline is only the beginning to a great future.

IT TAKES ALL KINDS TO MAKE A MALL

2011-08-24T20:29:00.000-07:00

The Mall in Washington, D.C. is a living kind of place. It attracts all manner of people. Indeed, it honors all manner of people. At one end is the U.S. Capitol, in which any person, assuming he can get through security, will have the opportunity to see the chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives or that of the U.S. Senate. At the far end of the Mall – just beyond the Lincoln Memorial – is the Potomac River. In between are a variety of museums and memorials to famous Founding Fathers, such as Washington and Jefferson.

As the times rolled by, demands arose for new memorials to honor a somewhat different order of worthy. Instead of memorials to outstanding historical figures of this nation’s past, a new, martial trend was discerned. There was constructed a Memorial Wall to Veterans of the Vietnam War. Later, there was constructed a Memorial to the Veterans of the Korean War.

In these latter two memorials there seemed to be a new trend of honoring the people in a more general way, as opposed to its leaders. Both memorials have been popular, receiving many visitors.I have the impression that there may be plans to build memorials to World War I & World War II, also. Of course, the Holocaust Memorial, aka, “the Haunted House,” is about a half block away from the Mall. If the world war projects go forward, the United States would seemingly be on the Roman road of war triumphs and honors. The memorials to the veterans of the two Iraqi wars plus Afghanistan may be just off stage awaiting a cue.

The original idea of an open sward between U.S. Capitol and the White House has long ago been subsumed by institutional erudition and vanity. Modern political correctness, aka, cultural Marxism, demands a return to overblown images of movement heroes. The memorial to the late Martin Luther King will probably be the first of these. If American leadership holds true to form, then subsequent memorials to Latino movement heroes would seem to be a certainty. I foresee a memorial to the American Indian on the Mall. Certainly, Asians will also find a memorial representation in an as yet uncertain hero.

The time may soon arrive when sunshine cannot find its way to the Mall for all the memorials.

As for myself, I’d prefer to see a new site obtained to honor various wars & warriors and various movement heroes. Haines Point might be such a site. Roosevelt Island might also be a suitable site, after securing it from flooding. Another possibility would be eminent domain expropriation for this purpose. One possibility would be the land east of the Supreme Court between East Capitol and Independence Avenue SE. It could extend all the way to the parking areas of RFK Stadium.

Although most people might not care for this idea, I also believe that the Maryland land south of National Harbor overlooking the Potomac River would be a likely spot.

At any rate we have travelled a long way from the practical reasoning of George Washington and the artistic reasoning of Thomas Jefferson to the Marxism-Baalism of modern American leadership. For many the Mall has become the New National Laboratory where we create our strength through honoring our diversity.

Will there be confusion through diversity on the Mall? Who can say? No one in America has a clear head any more. Well, almost none.

Note: Persistent hacking by an nest of molesters makes uniformity of text size and font difficult. It is the price of talent that the feckless nerd can only mar the appearance of words.

NATS CHANGE MANAGER

2011-07-03T17:39:00.001-07:00

Why did the Nats not deal with Jim Riggleman?

This was a question arising from the revelations following the resignation of Riggleman. The answer may be found in the words of Lord Byron, "Truth is stranger than fiction." Here - at last - are the real facts of the matter.

The Lerner family has a "thing" about syllables that is founded upon the family's deep interest in numerology. The number "2" is profoundly important to them. There are two syllables in "Lerner." There are two syllables in "Rizzo." BUT, there are three syllables in "Riggleman." This created unbearable tension in the Lerner operation.

General Manager Rizzo was well aware of the Lerner's disapproval of the 3-syllabled Riggleman. To keep the faith with them, Rizzo kept Riggleman feeling like a "temp" who was barely needed.

Things got so bad around the Nats' executive office that the Lerners would spit each time the 3-syllabled Riggleman's name was uttered.

Fully understanding the untenable situation, Rizzo looked about for options. At his side most days was Davey Johnson, who possessed the proper number of syllables to be acceptable to the Lerner family. Since he was already - sort of - a member of the Nats family, his appointment would not rankle any of the team.

This was important because the Nats had won 11-of-12 games under Riggleman. A team always has to respect superstition among its players. If an outsider were brought in, then team players might worry that their "rythmn" had been affected. Since Davey Johnson was a well-known, seasoned manager, as well as a member of the Nats "team," Rizzo made the decision to replace the awkward, 3-syllabled Riggleman, believing that it was a safe one. The Lerner family would welcome Johnson. There would be peace, harmony and - most importantly - numerological correctness at Nats headquarters.

This is the real story - believe it or not!

FNP: MICHELLE ANNOUNCES FARM EXPANSION

2011-06-15T19:03:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

NEWS BRIEFS

FNP has learned from sources within the White House that First Lady Michelle Obama has obtained a five-year, renewable lease on a certain verdant section of the Mall. According to our source, her purpose is to expand her share-cropping program on the White House lawn, which gave Washington, D.C. children an opportunity to work in the field as many of their ancestors did.

The First Lady’s success with children share-croppers has encouraged her to expand the scope of her experimental garden. The demand for White House veggies far exceeded the available produce. Michelle has vowed not to “tax” away the children’s share so as to meet this unexpected demand from all across the globe. Requests from Buckingham Palace and the Imperial Palace of Japan, as well as the Vatican, indicate the scope of the demand for White House veggies.

Needless to say, the price of White House veggies has “sky-rocketed” in the face of this demand. However, at this time there has been no move to regulate these commodities by any agency. FNP has heard rumors that some of the share-cropper children have hired agents to handle their shares of the veggies.

Therefore, with the advice and consent of President Obama, the First Lady quietly explored the possibility of using suitable Mall land. After weeks of discussion among White House staffers and those of Capitol Hill figures, as well as certain Executive Departments, the “green light” was given to the use of Mall land near the White House south lawn.

At this time First Lady Michelle Obama is working with staffers to increase the opportunities of becoming a White House share-cropper for all American kids. Further, a program to bring in foreign children as guest share-croppers is being considered.

One anonymous newshound has ventured to guess that, if Michelle Obama continued to whirl peas at this rate, she may well join her husband, Barack, as a Nobel Prize winner.

FNP: EARLY MAO OPERA DISCOVERED

2011-06-15T18:40:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, D.C.:

NEWS BRIEF

FNP has learned that German musicologists have discovered a vault in China that contained a collection of Mao Tze-Tung memorabilia from his post-college years preceding the communist revolution that overturned the Masonic republic. In these years Mao was developing his Marxist views.

Surprisingly, Mao Tze-Tung first intellectual love appeared to be opera. He clearly studied the Italian and French masters, as there were very early attempts at opera creation in the Italian style. However, melody was not as important a musical inspiration for Mao as discordance. Even in these early years after college, Mao appeared to love the clash of marching sounds in combat furious.

The German expert, Professor Esau Kochen, who led the team of musical experts that examined the first vault, expressed the view that Mao was not so much a musical genius as a musical general. He stated that Mao’s early works were instructive in developing a better understanding of his evolving socialist world-view.

As an example of one of the early Mao operas, Professor Kochen cited “Revolutionary Peasant-Farmers Rise Up and Smash the Capitalist Pig Peasant-Farmers.” According to the professor, this opera, using broad, clashing movements of discordant sounds, captured the essential elements later realized as the Cultural Revolution. This was formative work by the young Marxist giant. However, it contained the essential Mao dictum: “The high C alone is Bonapartist.”

FNP has been advised by German sources close to the Kochen group that the German team, including Dr. Heim Hirsh, Professor Helen Roth, and the Russian expatriot, Dr. Ivan Putinshtern, have been invited to spend the next three years in China as guests of the People’s Republic. The Chinese Cultural Minister, Ju-Man Nao, had advised them that there were many suspected “Mao vaults” hidden throughout China. He said that unknown cultural richness only awaited its being discovered to perhaps “change the world with Mao’s songs.”

FNP: DONNYBROOK AT WHITE HOUSE GALA

2011-05-18T19:48:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

Normally, the White House is an oasis of pomp and circumstance. However, according to usually reliable sources, that was not the case at a recent gala. President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle had decided to honor television celebrities with a Night at the White House tribute. Many well-known names attended. All was proceeding swimmingly, sources confirm.

The seating arrangement was such as to place at the same table several people, one of which was our anonymous source. She is a well-known figure in local television. According to her, Joan Rivers, Vince McMahon, and Sally Jesse Raphael were seated opposite her and in that order. At her left side and opposite them were special guests of the Obamas – Bill and Bernadine Dohrn Ayers, who are lawyer types, rather than television personalities, per se.

After several rounds of champagne and wine which were served during the fete, the mood was apparently carefree and chatty.

At the outset President Obama had given a welcoming speech, and he singled out Joan Rivers for this year’s “Michelle Award” for her long career in television. There was generally goodwill at the table where she sat. The Ayers both arose to embrace Joan Rivers, applauding her revolutionary humor. According to our source, Sally Jesse Raphael seemed inappropriately subdued, even disgruntled.

When they were all seated again, the smiling, merry mood seemed to continue. However, the friendliness distinctly changed soon after Vince McMahon turned to Sally Jesse Raphael and said: “Sally Jesse, next year will be your year.”

Joan Rivers looked shocked. Suddenly, the table was hushed. According to our source, at that very moment Bernadine Dohrn Ayers snapped at Vince: “Sally Jesse hasn’t grown like Joan has.” Bill Ayers added: “Joan has outgrown Sally Jesse. To give Sally Jesse the Michelle Award would degrade it.”

Vince appeared to be extremely uncomfortable.

Sally Jesse leaned forward, turning toward Joan Rivers, and said: “Joan, I’ll always remember you as you were – before the thousand operations. Michael Jackson told me a few years ago that you often used his plastic surgeons, and he marveled how you, as with him, had become a “makeover goddess.”

A look of outrage came over Joan Rivers.

Across the table Bernadine glared at Sally Jesse and said loudly: “Sally Jesse Raphael, when you are not held in contempt, you are laughed at as a talentless yenta. You should not even be seated at the same table as Joan Rivers!”

FNP was informed by our witness that Sally Jesse then rose from her seat and swung a fist at Bernadine, grazing her chin. Almost immediately after that, Joan Rivers leaped from her seat and circled behind Vince. She pulled Sally Jesse’s hair in a move which our source likened to a “back-shot.” Sally Jesse wield, clutching her hair for relief, and began clawing at Joan. Vince tried to separate the two, sustaining deep scratches to his face and hands. He was also bitten by Joan.

When this melee broke out, the Obamas were quickly escorted to safety. As our source pointed out, “who knew?” It might have been a madman.

Before the Ayers could circle around the table to help Joan, Marines and Secret Service Agents had reached the combatants and secured the scene. Order was restored. The antagonistic parties were separated.

Under the circumstances, President Obama felt that the gala night must now end. With grace and serenity he thanked all his guests and bade them “God’s speed.” It was time to “sign off.”
FNP contacted the White House Media Response Group to inquire about the strange reports bruited about, regarding the gala. We were told that one of the guests slipped while getting into a chair. Otherwise, the affair went as White House galas normally do.

FNP: WASHINGTON POST HOSTS MOGUL MARCH

2011-05-18T19:15:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

FNP has learned that Donald Graham and Catharine Weymouth will host this years "March of the Moguls" under the banner of The Washington Post. This event has become an annual parade showcasing America's leading plutocrats.

The parade will begin at the home of The Washington Post, which is located in a building at 15th & L Streets, NW, Washington, D.C. From there it will proceed southward past the U.S. Treasury building. As the paraders proceed past this building, they will pause to hear a few words of welcome from President Obama and Secretary Tim Geithner.

According to sources high in the Obama Administration, each mogul will receive a $20 Double Eagle gold coin in mint condition as a gesture of "thanks" for all they have done for America. Due to unexpected hardship, Bernie Madoff will receive ten gold coins for services provided in past years.

After this presentation, the moguls will continue their march to the west lawn of the U.S. Capitol. They will be met by a combined assemblage of Senators and Representatives, who will listen respectfully as the moguls sing: "God Gave This Land To We."

After this exuberant songfest, the moguls will be treated to canapes and cocktails. Parked discreetly to the side of the Capitol grounds, scores of limousines will await the weary but merry moguls.

The parade will be led by Donald Graham, Warren Buffet and Catharine Weymouth. Following this trio will be: Walter Shorenstein (San Francisco), Richard Swig (San Francisco), Scott Seligman (Michigan), Martin Selig (Seattle), Jack Benaroya (Seattle), Arthur Cohen (Arlen Realty...), a Samuel J. Lefrak family representative (N.Y.C.), representatives of the Uris, Durst, Tishman, Rudin, Horowitz, Ravitch, Minskoff, Milstein families (N.Y.C.), Sol Goldman and Frederic Rose family representatives (N.Y.C.), Aaron Gural, Leo and Alexander Bing, the Reznicks, Fishers, Koeppels, Wiens, Cohens and Silverstein family representatives (N.Y.C.), Steven Gaines (The Hamptons), Ben Tobin, Jack Weiler, Frederic and Earle Mack (N.Y./N.J.), Aaron Ziegelman (N.Y.C.), Jerry Speyer, Bernard Mendik (N.Y.C.), Steven Green (N.Y.C.), Albert M. Greenfield (Philadelphia), the Hellman family (Los Angeles), the Sam Zell family (Chicago), Neil Bluhm, Judd Malkin, Philip Klutznik (Chicago), Robert Smith (D.C.), Robert Kogod (D.C.) the Haft family representative (D.C.), Mort Zuckerman (D.C.), Albert Abramson (D.C.), Ted Lerner (D.C.), Bernard and Carol Gewirz(D.C.), Robert Rosenthal (D.C.), Estelle Gelman (D.C.), Hermen Greenberg (D.C.), representatives of the Abe Polin family (D.C.), Myer and Adrienne Arsht Feldman (D.C.), Joel Meisel (D.C.), Barry Cohen (D.C.), Jerry Moore (Houston), David Mincberg (Houston), Laurence Hirsch (CEO of Centex), a representative of the Mark Goldweitz family (Boston), Jerome Rappaport (Boston), the Krupp family representative (Boston), Stephen Karp (Boston), Julian Cohen (D.C.), Bruce Beal (Boston), Steve Fishman (Boston), Ron Drucker (Boston), Dick Friedman (Boston), Alan Leventhal (Boston), Edwin Sidman (Boston), the representative of the Simon Konover family (N.E.), Richard Penzer (Pittsburgh), William Adler (Chicago), Jona Goldrich (L.A.), Abraham Lurie (L.A.),Mark Nathanson (L.A.), Craig Robins (Miami), Tony Goldman (N.Y.), John Price (Utah), Sally Barry (Denver), Jordan Perlmutter (Denver), Shaul Baruch (Denver), Phil and Harley Schrager (Omaha), Mort Friedman (Sacramento), Sheldon Solow (N.Y.C.), David Steiner (N.Y.C.), and many Canadian families, such as the Bronfman, Reichman, Munk, Mernick and Belzberg, who control vast properties in America, will send representatives. There are many other prominent moguls - not listed here - who will attend.

Donald Graham was overheard gloating about the march at a recent dinner with Emil and Warren at The Boss Lady. This posh restaurant in Georgetown, named after Katherine Meyer Graham, has become the spot for real power in America and in the world to have a "square meal" of pricey dishes, while plotting such things as control of Brazilian real estate. No wonder "regular" people can't get a seat at it.

Not to worry! FNP has many eyes that are happy to share the news about what they see.

FNP: OSAMA BIN LADEN IN LOVE?

2011-03-12T19:12:00.000-08:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington,DC:

There has been a growing sentiment within intelligence circles in the West that Osama bin Laden has fallen in love. According to usually reliable sources working the intelligence beat, Osama has been lying awake at night on his bedding in a cave in Pakistan, staring at a small picture which he had cut from a newspaper some months back. His only light has been a half burnt candle.

According to one clandestine observer who has since fled to the West, Osama has been heard muttering affectionate words to the picture. He has been seen kissing the photograph, sometimes passionately. One clandestine observer has sworn to intelligence debriefers that he had witnessed what must surely be an erection on the leader of al Qaeda, as he ogled the photograph.

Usually reliable sources especially close to French intelligence, have stated that the real reason that Osama bin Laden suddenly appeared to be much younger was that he had dyed his beard “black,” hoping to impress the object of his fiery passion. For this reason, anonymous insiders in the American & Israeli intelligence condominium realized that the object of his love must be someone likely to see Osama’s picture. If she was impressed by his youthful vigor, then she might signal to him that “she’s ready.”

Who was this mystery lady? According to the “turned Osama confidant,” who had sneaked a peek into Osama’s bedroom-in-a-cave, she was none other than Condoleezza Rice, U.S. Secretary of State.

According to highly placed State Department officials, the brainy beauty had been quoted as stating that she thought that Osama was “dreamy” and “a real hunk.” These same sources had been aware that Miss Rice was quietly working to arrange a private meeting with Osama in a neutral cave to discuss peace. Anonymous wags have dubbed it, “The Love Cave.”

FNP: STORKING THE WHITE HOUSE

2011-03-12T19:00:00.000-08:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, D.C.:

Among seasoned newshounds working the White House beat, there have been many tense discussions during the last year of the George W. Bush Administration. The focus of these discussions has been Condoleezza Rice, the former Secretary of State.
For most Americans the whole matter was totally unknown. Many journalists were unaware of the issue. What are we talking about?

Let's just say that FNP has been "storking the White House" for more than a year. What got us "twittering" at the Bushes? Diapers!

FNP has been able to establish beyond doubt that the Bush Administration had tried to dispose of incriminating diaper evidence through clandestine means. The C.I.A. was used to launder the many soiled diapers that had been collected by the Secret Service and held under seal in a room in the basement of the White House. Why?

After many months of digging, FNP newshounds were able to eliminate everyone but Condoleezza Rice and President Bush. FNP's executives made the decision that this story was too big to bury. We put some very good reporters on this assignment.
About one year before the Bush Administration passed the baton to President-Elect Obama, many Washington journalists and camera-carters began to talk about "Condi's weight gain." There was a blossoming of weight about her waist that continued for several months. Then, suddenly, the Secretary of State vanished. Her whereabouts could not be learned, even by the closest of State Department beat reporters.

FNP had even written a brief column speculating that she had gone to the Middle East to arrange a meeting in a suitably neutral cave between President Bush and Osama bin Laden. This was about the time that candidate Barack Obama was visiting Pakhistan, also seeking a meeting with the al Qaeda chieftain.

As suddenly as Secretary Condoleezza Rice had vanished from official Washington, she reappeared. In truth, only several days were involved. When she surfaced, it was at the State Department, where she was seen greeting diplomatic figures from Saudi Arabia. What amazed the reporters covering this beat was that she was so thin. She was as thin as ... as ... well, as old Condoleezza Rice had been. This was a real headscratcher for journalists.

Further, FNP had learned from an old friend in Texas, who requested anonymity, that there was talk among Texas newshounds that W. was "up to something" with Condi. The word was that Condi would arrive in a long, black limousine on a Friday night at the W. ranch in Crawford. No one would see her or W. again until the long, black limousine reappeared on Sunday night. Condoleezza Rice would quickly dart into the limousine, and it would then speed away.

FNP agreed with our Texas friend that there was a story here. We ramped up our investigation, and made it known around Washington that we were interested in any sound contribution to our effort. We were known to be generous to our friends. And we never divulged our sources.

We got two quick breaks. According to a usually reliable source covering the social side of Washington for a well-known magazine, there had been a private gathering in north Georgetown. She had been invited. When she got to the gathering, she noticed the Bush daughters, who, she reported, were feeling no pain. She overheard one say to the other: "This beats changing W.C.'s diapers." At the time she puzzled over what she had heard. It did not seem to make sense.

Next came the mysterious envelope. With FNP's reputation it - the envelope - didn't really surprise our executives in retrospect. However, at the time there was that tingle of anticipation. Someone had stuck an envelope through our "after-hours" delivery slot at the office. FNP would later learn that a Secret Service Agent had provided the envelope.

It was our assistant researcher, Dollie Daugherty, who picked up the envelope and opened it as she went to her desk. She told her peers at FNP that she was astonished to see a picture of a baby. Searching the envelope, she discovered a small note that said: "My Daddy's in the White House." It was signed "W.C."

After the executives at FNP saw it, bells began to ring. The decision was made to redouble our efforts. That was when we found that the going was getting tough. We pressed as hard as we dared but could not unravel the strange string of events.

Other strange events followed.

Secretary of State Rice had become the "toast of the town" after she had met with Osama bin Laden in a cave in Pakhistan. Their "frank" discussions over three days had been intense, with reporters covering the event testifying in stories printed in world-class newspaper that they were alone for extended periods of time. They said that from time to time they could hear what seemed to be shouting or crying from both.

Curiously, pundits back in Washington observed that Condi was gaining weight again. It was dismissed as too much "wining & dining" at diplomatic galas which were nearly daily events in Washington, as well as many other places. Seasoned reporters noted how such "partying" had ruined the health of William Jefferson Clinton.
After Barack Obama became President-Elect, the transition teams began to work for a smooth change of players. Secretary Rice, who became very obese during the last month of W.'s presidency, was a leader of this transition period. She almost lived at the White House during this period.

FNP watched these events closely. Two more pieces of journalistic luck occurred that helped us unravel the mystery. One, when President Bush and First Lady Laura turned over the White House to Barack and Michelle Obama, Condoleezza Rice was present. What got FNP's attention was that she was quite thin. She seemed to glow. She looked fit and happy.

Many journalists conceded that she had a tough job which she did very well indeed. Naturally, handing over the responsibilities must have taken a great burden from her shoulders. Of course, she would be happy.

However, at FNP journalistic antennae were raised high. Then, the second event occurred. The Obama Administration was only a few days beyond a month in power. We got a call from a very high contact at the C.I.A., who told us to look for a package in a trash can on the street corner one block away. He told us to look for one marked "W.C.'s unwanteds."

This message was too curious not to investigate. Many of our older reporters recalled the "Deep Throat" period of journalism. Only recently was the identity of "Deep Throat" discovered to be Bernadine Dorhn, who had been introduced to the Graham family by Ms. Squeaky Fromme, who acted at the behest of Ms. Patty Hearst.

As a matter of fact, FNP honcho, Anthony Eaglewolf, went to the designated trash can and dug for the described envelope. Both surprised and relieved, he brought the envelope back unopened. It was large and more of a package than envelope. The message written on it was in black marker ink.

Back at the FNP office he set the package on a table. A dozen newshounds gathered about it. Anthony opened it with a small box-opening knife. The moment it opened, it emitted a dreadful odor. Anthony dumped its contents on the table. A small mound of Pampers were suddenly formed. We photographed the evidence. Then Anthony Eaglewolf ordered reporters and photographers to begin a general search of trash cans near the White House, looking for packages that were identical to the one just opened. That night a score of trash cans yielded packages of Pampers.
There was a new mystery that was born that night. Some of the packages were marked "W.C.'s" but others were marked "O.C.'s." The staff at FNP looked at each other. What do these initials mean? Something strange was going on!

Not two days had passed, when once again, Dollie Daugherty noticed an intriguing envelope in FNP's delivery slot. It looked just like the odd envelope that had had the picture that stirred up the FNP brass. She picked it up and went to her desk. She opened it. She removed a photo that had a small note stuck to it. It read: "My 'Daddy's' in the White House." It was almost the same message she had read before. Yet, there was a different signature. This message was signed "O.C." She looked at the picture. It was not the same baby. There was a new baby picture. She hurried to the executive offices at the top of the FNP Building.

A few FNP executives were meeting in a large chamber to discuss, as it happened, the strange events at the White House. Dollie burst into the room. Although a bit annoyed at first, one look at Dollie and they knew it was important. She handed one of them the envelope with the picture and note. The contents were soon revealed to the gathered news mavens.

One of them, Jasper Bain, looked triumphantly at the others and said: "The mystery at the White House is solved. Gentlemen, I present to you another love-child in the White House. We have a case of the same hole but different poles!"

FNP has made several efforts to interview Condoleezza Rice, Osama bin Laden and W. None have returned our telephone calls. The Obama White House has refused to affirm or deny the presence of love-children at the White House. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has indicated to the press that his lips were sealed.

FNP: SCIENTISTS SEE NEW KID ON THE BLOCK

2011-03-12T18:47:00.000-08:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

A small but growing segment of the scientists specializing in Physical Anthropology, Forensic Anthropology, Comparative Anatomy, Evolutionary Biology, Ethnology, Gene Ontology, and Sociology and Unified Cultural Speciology believe that “man” and “ape” are essentially the same thing. Therefore, they believe that modern taxonomy should reflect this likeness, as opposed to distinctions. This movement generally deplores human ethnocentrism as “bad science” and essentially “racist.”

“Lookee,” said Professor Morris Goodman of Wayne State University’s School of Medicine in Detroit, “Humans are like 2010 Mercedes Benz, while chimps are like 2007 models. We are basically the same car.”

Professor Goodman led a team of scientists who analyzed published sequences of 97 genes on six “apes,” including chimps, gorillas, orangutans and man. These researchers discovered that 99.4 % of the key DNA sites (collectively, 90,000 base pairs – “genetic letters”) that code for proteins were shared among humans and chimps. The other apes are almost as close. The logical implication of his data is that there is only one true “Homo.” All should be placed in the same Genus, whether it is termed “Homo” or “Pan.”

Among contemporary, living apes only humans are placed in the category of “Homo.” This has been the case since modern taxonomy was defined by the famous Swedish scientist, Carl Linnaeus, in Systemae Naturae, published in 1735. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach had proposed a new taxonomy in 1795, but it retained Linnaeus’ human priority and distinction from the Ape category.

Georgetown University Professor Stanley Blatzberg-Harriman has drolly categorized these early taxonomists as “jive-turkey Europeans.”

On occasion FNP has noted articles carried by other news media in which the suggestion was made that chimps and man be classified as “Homo.” The logic of such articles seemed to be that chimps should not be incarcerated in zoos, but rather these “brothers” should be attending usual human institutions such as churches, synagogues, lodges, schools, et cetera. There should be equal opportunity for all humans (or apes) in the workplace, and they should have equal access to public facilities.

“Separate-but-equal concepts of law among humans has been declared unconstitutional,” declared Professor Amery Stern-Morgan of Harvard University’s School of Law. “Should scientists determine that chimps and other apes share 99.4% of the same DNA architecture as humans, what court would deny their humanity?”

According to FNP’s researcher on this issue, the figure of 99.4% shared genes, used by the Goodman team, differed from other studies.

For example, the Roy J. Brutten team, using a different approach, arrived at a figure of 95% correspondence between chimp and human genomes. Still another study by Tatsuya Ansai and his team, again using a different approach, arrived at 86.7% correspondence. Still, other media have used the figure of 97%, when featuring this issue.

For our readers to better understand this problem, FNP offers a caveat. When Linnaeus created his taxonomy, he used the word “species,” which was derived from the Latin word for “to see.” Hence, what was visible to the eye as a significant difference became a defining categorical niche. However, in private Linnaeus apparently questioned his own division of Man from Ape. One reason for his decision was “fear of clergy.”

Clearly, the issue of difference would be argued, due to its subjectivity, even when facts were set forth to offer justification. Due to human bias, this had a prevailing effect of human ethnocentrism and superiority.

However, when the technology advanced in optics, et al, to see “the world within,” opinion among scientists began to radically drift away from ordinary humans. They immersed themselves in an otherwise “strange land.” Their predominant link to the ordinary human’s world became weaker and more tenuous. A kind of contempt for the “vulgarity” of every-day people arose.

Scientist, such as Professor Irv Davis of Stanford University, proclaimed that the distinction between humans and chimps was basically “cultural.” He stated, “Maybe if the chimps would send us a Peace Corps, humans could be uplifted from their vain modes of thinking. At Stanford we are attempting to develop a chimp pedagogy specifically trained to teach humans.”

Famed British physicist, Richard Dawkins, decried the “discontinuous mind” which tries to impose inflexible, inaccurate definitions to non-discreet phenomena. “How,” he wondered, “Can science accept a decorative distinction between waffles and pancakes as permanent?”

FNP reports, but our function does not include defining forms of life. If a chimp becomes a governor or senator, we will judge him by his deeds – not by whether he has “poster boy” good-looks or comes from a rich family. As the poet Robert Burns wrote: “A man’s a man for all that.” FNP might well add: “An ape’s an ape for all that.”

FNP: DONALD GRAHAM, THE LAST QUEEN OF SCOTLAND?

2010-10-28T17:25:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, D.C.:

Katherine Meyer Graham

FNP has stumbled across some interesting new information that recently surfaced in regard to the late Katherine Meyer Graham.

As many of our readers know, Mrs. Graham met an untimely demise in Wyoming, when she allegedly stumbled.

Note: some highly placed Wyoming authorities have been, and still are, suspicious about this “accidental” death, and the case may be re-opened as a homicide inquiry.

According to usually informed “Graham watchers,” prior to her unexpected “fall,” Katherine Meyer Graham had hired some of the finest genealogists in American and the U.K. to investigate her various family lines. Included amongst these authorities were top professionals from Burke’s Peerage. According to usually reliable sources, the investigation hit “pay dirt.” An overlooked line through Mrs. Graham’s husband, Philip, was “royal-blue blood.”

Famed historian, Professor Bene’ Brazil, discovered verified documents suggesting that Mary, Queen of Scotland, had a “love child.” According to this new evidence, the queen had a brief ardor for a Spanish dignitary, Lorenzo de Cordoba, who had visited her court on official business of the king.

Interestingly, Lorenzo was said to be a Marrano that was descended from the Sephardic Jew, Ricardo de Marrakech, a gentleman who came into great prominence at the time of the Muslim Imperium in North Africa. He was a counselor to the Caliph of Cordoba. His wealth and power became great. He was famed for his vision. Professor Brazil has suggested, in fact, that a “love child" of his became the world famous, Nostradamus, whose prophetic vision is studied even today.

The professor has announced his determination to search the line of Ricardo de Marrakech further. Apparently, Ricardo’s father, “Esau the Imposter,” had earned a vile reputation in western North Africa.

Esau the Imposter

This breaking story has surprising importance for our time. If the information obtained by these experts should stand, the late Philip Graham was possessed of a lineage which gave him a claim to be the rightful king of Scotland.

Although the kingdom of Scotland doesn’t exist as a separate, sovereign nation, being part of Great Britain, and it is ruled by the Windsor (nee’ Hanover) queen, Elizabeth II, there have been separatist spirits stirring there for a long time. These spirits in recent times have waxed noticeably. Should a separatist movement engender sufficient force to compel an autonomous state within a state, one that has at least a figurehead king for the sake of tradition and for the sake of providing patriots a point around which they might gather, then serious attention must be given to any heir of Philip Graham, as that rightful king.

The one person whose name has most often been mentioned was Donald Graham, the well-known media mogul. Sometimes referenced as the “Lord of Fifteenth Street,” Donald was comfortable in the realm of riches and power. As a frequent attendee at “Bilderberger” meetings, where royal and rich people, and their servant “eggheads,” gather to schmooze, kvetch and schlep (to the canapé trays), he was quite aware of the culture of European High Society. He, indeed, fitted in well. Informed sources suggested that he would bring his pet “hog” to advise and brief him on the more difficult concepts bandied about by leaders of the ”World Community.” Indeed, the court of “King Graham” might well be filled with former Washington Post employees.

As Professor Brazil asserted, if William the Conqueror could appoint Normans to the lordships of England, why couldn’t King Donald appoint loyal Post pundits to the lordships of Scotland?

FNP hastens to warn that this excitement about Donald Graham is premature. Whether events unfold in such a way as to create the need for a king in Scotland cannot be known with certainty. Those who make a point of speculating upon such events say that the crown may go to Donald. How the Scot people “personalize” Donnie’s rule can only be guessed at, but at least one expert observer felt that the Scot people might well dub him: “Donald the Strange.”

Donald Graham

One interested observer noted, strictly “not for attribution,” that Donald’s alleged surgery and identity “makeover” might preclude his being crowned “king.” While no further comment was made, the implication of this informed source seemed to be that Donnie would instead be crowned “Queen of Scotland.” If this be so, then let us all shout: “Long Live the Queen!”

Ricardo de Marrakech

FNP: RUMORS ABOUND IN DC THAT DONALD GRAHAM IS NOW A WOMAN

2010-10-23T18:10:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

There have been persistent rumors floating about Washington that the Chairman of The Washington Post Company, Donald E. Graham, was now a woman.

According to one anonymous source, the late Katherine Meyer Graham had kept a stable of Haitian Mandingoes in plush digs near the company offices at 15th & L Streets, NW Washington, D.C. According to this source, Donald fell in love with one of these Haitians. His name was either Emil or Ariel. He was, unfortunately, also Katherine’s favorite lover.

There had been numerous allegations of instability in Donald Graham, but fear of the wrath of this powerful family induced an almost uniform soto voce character to such expressions.

According to one usually reliable source, this triangle became increasingly acrimonious, as Donald’s jealousy toward his mother grew deeper. He suffered from not merely frustration but a deep sense of wanton wounding. His mother could have had any of the Mandingoes. Why did she have to spend all her free time with Emil? There had been a suggestion, according to this source, that Donald grew to believe that his mother was doing it intentionally to spite him, to mock him, and to keep him deprived of the love he sought so urgently.

Knowledgeable observers of this unsavory situation began to fear that something terrible was going to happen. When the first reports of Katherine Meyer Graham’s “accident” in Wyoming were received in the Washington, D.C. area, there were many quick, shared glances amongst those privileged to be part of this great family’s friends, associates, servants, and contractors. These were they who had come to know something of this awkward love triangle.

For all his oddness and instability, Donald Graham had made many strong and useful acquaintances. From his father, Philip L. Graham, he had inherited many close, well-connected C.I.A. officials. Such men were well-accustomed to “odd-balls” and would have thought nothing particularly strange about Donald.

Too, Donald spent a period of time in the military in Vietnam. Many shrewd observers suspected that he worked for the C.I.A. clandestinely. Rumors of drug-dealing naturally arose, given the assumed C.I.A. connection.

When he returned to the U.S.A., Donald briefly joined the D.C. Metropolitan police. Several anonymous observers believed that he had made private contacts amongst the most promising young officers, sealing these relationships over the years. Most of these observers believed that Donald had been able to influence the decisions about which police officer went to which key department within the Metropolitan police organization. These relationships, sources suggested, would gain for Donald access to men who would be willing to do just about anything for the right “payday.”

His position at The Washington Post, his relationship with the C.I.A., and his relationship with the Metropolitan Police Department provided Donald Graham with levers for “hushing” or “covering up” matters that ordinary mortals could not. Not even Katherine Meyer Graham had such connections.

The death of Katherine Meyer Graham had surprised many. Mourners would stop by the imposing Graham estate to pay their respects. Some would later report that Donald had been upstairs in seclusion. They reported hearing him wailing at his loss, but a few of these had observed that the sounds were more like “cackling.”

Knowledgeable observers of the Washington, D.C. scene have sworn that Donald moved into the plush digs where the Haitian Mandingos had lived. According to these anonymous reporters, Donald sent all the Haitians home, excepting Emil.

Unfortunately, the old triangle existed as a shadow, because Emil had a genuine, sensual love for Katherine. According to a highly-placed Graham-family observer, distraught by this lingering intrusion of his mother into his love-life, he had promised Emil that he, Donald, would become like “Mother.”

More than a few people had been aware of the alleged “prostate” operation which Donald underwent. Such operations have occurred each year in the United States in the scores of thousands, give or take. Most of these operations had been what they had been said to have been. Yet, in the case of Donald Graham, something different was said to have occurred. Anonymous but usually reliable sources state unequivocally that special surgeons had been present. It was said that they had brought along their own special nurses. Further, according to knowledgeable medical personnel, there were pieces of equipment brought into the operating room never used for a simple prostate removal procedure. They hadn't known what such devices were used for. Furthermore, hardly had the prostate operation reached a level of immediacy, when all the regular surgeons were replaced by these other doctors. The regular doctors had walked out of the operating room, along with the nurses who usually assisted at such operations. They were replaced by a team of surgeons who had flown from Switzerland just to operate on Donald. Lastly, the operation on Donald Graham took far more time than a typical prostate removal would have taken.

Although the matter has not been conclusively determined, as Donald Graham has refused all suggestions that a neutral medical specialist check his postoperative condition, rumors about a sex-change operation have grown. There were rumors that he may have had a realistic, penial-scrotal prosthesis constructed, perhaps from molds of his actual, original equipment. The great wealth of the Graham family made such a fantasy operation actually achievable. The great power of The Washington Post made a “cover-up” plausible. Having friends in high places at the C.I.A. and the D.C. Metropolitan Police, can’t hurt. Further, there could be no doubt that the elite like to hang out together, preferably behind high walls or fences and guarded by well-trained security, whose price tag made them available only to the rich. The rich were special and, perhaps, strange.

There was, perhaps, this last item. The quality of this report was not so solid, however. There was a source that stated emphatically that Donald and Emil lived together as often as possible in the plush digs originally provided by Katherine Meyer Graham. Emil was said to be very happy about Donald’s operation. Lastly, this source claimed that they loved to watch Richard Widmark films together.

Richard Widmark

Some FNP readers may object that this story isn't hard news. To some it may appear to be the sort of thing one might encounter on Entertainment Today and not suited to a great news outlet such as FNP. However, the "movers and shakers" in America deserve to be accorded special attention. People such as Donald Graham aren't like you and me. The people must know.

Donald Graham

FNP: MR. T HOSPITALIZED

2010-10-23T16:46:00.000-07:00

Mr. T

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

FNP has learned from very reliable sources in the Israeli state that Mr.T was hospitalized for minor injuries incurred during a Jewish ritual. He is expected to be released, barring complications, in a couple of days.

According to one source, when Mr.T was first hired to protect the comatose General Ariel Sharon, Binyamin Netanyahu objected because he asserted that Mr. T was not clean, according to rabbinic authorities on the Talmud. He stated that Israeli intelligence had determined that Mr.T was not circumcised. Hence, he could not be allowed near the ailing Sharon.

Gurli Gur

According to Israeli media star, Gurli Gur, at a conference between Israeli state officials, hospital officials, and Mr.T, the renowned security expert agreed to be circumcised. He stated that his main concern was protecting Ariel Sharon.

Sources say that it was at this time that Binyamin Netanyahu, who had attended this meeting, suggested that Rabbi Shammi Oyhe, reputed to be very close to the hardest elements in the Likud Party and a relative of Mr. Netanyahu, perform the ritual circumcision.

All sources have independently affirmed these facts as certain. The meeting broke up and the appointed date for the circumcision was the following day.

Once again turning to Gurli Gur, who attended the ceremony as a representative of the pooled media, FNP was advised by this super-newshound that the relevant individuals gathered at the appointed place, which was a room at the hospital. Mr.T was dressed in a blue institutional robe of the type usually provided to patients who were to be operated on. He wore very few of his distinctive, decorative apparel. He was present before the rabbinic official arrived. He did not seem nervous but rather stoical.

According to this source, Rabbi Oyhe arrived soon thereafter. From a leather case he withdrew his special ointments and tools and set them on a table upon which clean linen had been placed. A special candle, called the "pillar of Akiva," was set on the table and lit. There were two rabbinic witnesses to the correctness of the procedure.

Rabbi Shammi Oyhe

When all was prepared, Rabbi Shammi Oyhe motioned for Mr.T to take a supine position on an indicated surgical platform near at hand. Mr.T was told to roll to one side, so that the rabbi could have an advantageous position to execute the circumcision. The other rabbis took positions on the backside of Mr.T, effectively shielding the procedure from the eyes of the others in the room.

According to Mr. Gur, all seemed well. The presiding rabbi had placed the part on a small linen-covered, wooden block. He was seen to stoop to his case and withdraw something - perhaps a special tool.

Then, suddenly Mr.T and Rabbi Oyhe were struggling with a meat cleaver. The two witnessing rabbis attempted to restrain Mr.T, but they could not control the powerful "King of Bodyguards." When order was restored by police and hospital orderlies, the two camps broke up.

As the rabbis stormed out of the room, according to our source, they gave Mr.T the "Evil-Eye."

At a post-circumcision meeting shortly thereafter, the still excited, angry Mr.T exclaimed: "That fool tried to tomahawk me!"

Indeed, some minor damage had been inflicted on Mr.T, who stayed overnight in a hospital bed as a precautionary measure. From all FNP's sources in the hospital and the Israeli leadership, Mr.T remained uncircumcised.

A friendly rabbi had offered to perform a conceptual circumcision to make Mr.T eligible for security duty over the person of Ariel Sharon. Although opposed by the Netanyahu faction, this proposal won approval among a majority of Israeli statemen.

Two days later, Mr.T was providing vigorous bodyguard service for the beloved, comatose Sharon.

FNP's man in the Levant, Jasper Lee Stone, has advised us that there was considerable hostility within the Israeli government toward Mr.T and also toward Curtis Sliwa. "Expect more trouble," he advised.

Curtis Sliwa

FNP is watching events in the Middle East very intently and carefully. This is a "hotspot" that won't cool.

FNP: POLICE EYE DONNIE LINK TO CHANDRA

2010-10-22T20:51:00.000-07:00

Donald Graham

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, D.C.:

This is a breaking story. FNP has learned that Donald Graham has become a "person of interest" in the Chandra Levy case.

A very high source in the California State Attorney's Office, who requested anonymity for this information, confirmed that Mr. Donald Graham was thought to be involved in the death of Chandra Levy.

FNP has sounded out our West Coast contacts to get a better picture of how things stand. Our best sources agree that data had been gathered by California police, which established a circumstantial connection between Mr. Graham and Ms. Levy, and that it will be revealed to the proper Washington, D.C. authorities soon.

One of the sources in the West Coast investigation was thought to be Patty "Machine Gun" Hearst, who has had a longtime friendship with the strange Donnie Graham. This media mogul would not return FNP's telephone calls to Hearst Publications.

Nevertheless, FNP has been able to piece together a very general understanding of the facts of the case and the issues at law.

By now most people were aware of Chandra Levy's relationship with Congressman Gary Condit. It was an illicit affair, as Condit was married. Why would the young intern get intimately involved with Representative Condit?

As we have suggested in the past, one scenario involving Ms. Levy was that she was enlisted by the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency famed for its deceit in pursuit of a successful mission. If in fact she was a tool of the Mossad, her part in its mission would be to spy on Rep. Condit, who headed a House Subcommittee on Intelligence. It has been said that we live in an Age of Information. Control of information was power. Intelligence was the key to control.

Chandra Levy

Assuming Ms. Levy was devoted to the Israeli State, her devotion to its cause was probably complete. She would give up her body, if it would bring security to the Jewish State. She was a soldier.

However, if Ms. Levy "fell for" Rep. Condit unexpectedly, then she might be deemed a toxic asset by the Mossad. Then it might be necessary to terminate Ms. Levy and blame the crime on a patsy.

By using advanced forensic counterfeiting, Chandra's simulated teeth, DNA, bones and clothing could be hidden at a remote part of the Rock Creek Park. Counting on D.C. Metropolitan Police to be reluctant to search thick out-of-the-way terrain, the Mossad could let the "remains" weather according to local conditions. Then they could send an operative to walk the dog in that remote area, and, in the process he would discover her "remains," notifying police soon thereafter.

The Mossad would count on the U.S. Park police to arrive first. Observation of their work in the Vince Foster case would have made the Mossad confident that they would quickly fall for the ruse.

However, there was also the possibility that the Mossad might view Chandra Levy as a "diamond in the rough" who merely needed to be educated and refined in her craft. In this scenario the real Chandra Levy might actually have been taken to the Israeli state, where she could be trained for additional espionage - possibly in Europe or the Levant. With her hair dyed blonde, only her parents would be able to reckonize her, but they would not be looking, as they would think that she was dead.

The Israeli Embassy has refused to comment on this issue.

In the past we offered a second scenario, and it is this scenario that interested the West Coast authorities. Our scenario went thusly:

Chandra Levy had been a journalist major in college. Although such a degree would make Ms. Levy even more interesting to the Mossad, they might not be alone. Katherine Meyer Graham was the head of one of the nation's most successful media empires, led by The Washington Post. The Post undoubtedly had an eye out for promising young journalists.

Katherine Meyer Graham

One can easily imagine Katherine Meyer Graham inviting some key representatives to the Post penthouse for "off the record" discussions. Among these might well be Rep. Condit. Perhaps on another occasion such as a gala for some worthy cause, Katherine Meyer Graham might encounter Rep. Condit, who would be seen escorting Chandra Levy, as his wife might have taken ill and bid him to "get a gal from the office to go with you."

FNP had speculated that Mrs. Graham had liked the young intern at once. Learning that she had a degree in journalism, Katherine Meyer Graham most certainly would have urged her to consider a career at The Washington Post. She probably invited Chandra to a private party - "Just us girls!" - so that Rep. Condit would not be offended nor offer objection.

The gathered evidence pointed to a budding love affair between the powerful Katherine and the bright young Chandra. One highly regarded Graham-watcher told FNP that Mrs. Graham shared with Chandra her fear of Donnie. According to this source, the plucky Chandra was incensed at the thought of anyone hurting Katherine.

If this speculation proved to be correct, then immediately it would have establish a dangerous triangle of Katherine, Chandra and Donnie. Sources close to the Graham family have maintained that Donald Graham was insanely jealous of his mother. He had seen her take away one lover, and now she was betraying the memory of Phillip Graham, who had died under suspicious circumstances, when he appeared to be planning to steal The Washington Post from Katherine, divorce her, and take up with his mistress.

FNP underlines this point: It was not a same-sex issue.

Donald Graham had proven to be an amiable oddball, who had accomplished little in life on his own. His lush, hedonistic lifestyle did not commend him as a workaday prospect. Yet, some Graham observers have maintained that Donnie's personality had changed over the last few years. It was a darker, brooding one.

Surely, Donnie must have worried about his future. If his mother gave The Washington Post to her new protege, Chandra Levy, what would become of Donnie?

According to Graham watchers, at a dinner party given by Katherine, Donnie had met Chandra, who had laughed at him. These sources stated that Donald had fled to his room, locked the door, and watched Richard Widmark movies. Sometimes, these sources claimed, they had hear "cackling" sounds coming from Donald's room.

These, then, were the steamy conditions surrounding the "triangle of passion."

The case preparation in California suggested that Donnie had lured Chandra Levy to his apartment on some pretext. After she had arrived, either Donald, or Emil, or both strangled Ms. Levy. They waited until dark. Then they stealthily carried her in a box to a large SUV, wherein they shoved the box. They drove toward the west side of the wooded area of Rock Creek Park. They parked and watched.

When it was clear that no one was about, they proceeded. Although Chandra Levy was a short woman and slender, authorities speculated that Emil carried the body on his shoulder. It was likely that a blanket or quilt covered her body. Even if the police drove near, they would not likely bother them, supposing that some sort of romantic interlude was imminent.

California Police speculated that Donnie led the way, using a small flashlight now and then as they proceeded into the thick, viney woods. When a suitable spot was found by Donnie, he signaled Emil. The huge Haitian Mandingo would then drop the body at the indicated spot. Immediately, the body would be "lost" in the grass, brush and vines.

Whether Donnie and Emil lingered nearby to provide a credible "cover story" cannot be known at this time.

FNP has learned from well-established Graham-watchers that Katherine Meyer Graham was very agitated during this time period. Privately, she must have been very worried about Chandra's absence. There have been unofficial reports of her frantically calling Rep. Condit, the Levy family, and her close advisors to find Chandra. Her life had had to endure so much, and now Chandra!

After his stint in Vietnam where Donnie was rumored to have assisted the C.I.A. in the Golden Triangle, he returned to Washington, D.C., where he briefly worked as a police officer with the Metropolitan Police. There, he made some lifelong friends, and he was able to help them in their careers as police officers over the years. The Washington Post was known to be close to the leadership of the Metropolitan Police, just as it was close to those at the C.I.A. and at the Pentagon.

Due to the D.C. Metropolitan Police considering Donnie "one of them," no investigation of Donald Graham as a potential "person of interest" had been initiated to this date. Usually reliable sources on the police beat have reported to FNP that they have heard nothing. Our own investigation has turned up no local investigation of Donald Graham.

Recently, cub reporters at The Washington Post have published a "complete" book on the "Chandra Levy murder."

Cathy Weymouth

Many have viewed the book as a Catharine Weymouth-engineered attempt to throw any investigators off the scent of Uncle Donald Graham. Its timing was a bit too perfect, as the Latino "patsy" was about to get his day in "kangaroo" court.

Has Donald Graham gotten away with it?

If Katherine Meyer Graham did learn of Donnie's involvement, then she must have known that she was in danger. Only a couple of months had passed since Chandra's unexplained disappearance, when the world learned of Katherine's "accidental fall" in Wyoming. California authorities realised that the triangle was crumbling before their eyes.

FNP will keep our eyes on this story.

FNP: LIKUD WARNED BY GOLDA MEIR

2010-10-11T21:58:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, D.C.:

There have been reports coming out of the Israeli state by usually reliable sources that the Likud Party has been reprimanded by Golda Meir, who appeared at a seance held by Rabbi Noshi for Binyamin Netanyahu and his chief advisers.

The late Prime Minister Meir appeared as a stern spectre before the exalted group. She was clearly angry that Netanyahu had turned to Sonny Barger to end Palestinian impudence, according to one highly placed observer. This observer quoted Ms. Golda Meir as exclaiming: "He is a putz!" She then turned to Netanyahu and snapped: "Macher! Your decisions are ipish!"

According to reliable but anonymous observers, the Prime Minister tried to defend his decision by stating that Sonny Barger would be a "patsy." The IDF had assured the leaders of the Likud that Barger would never leave the battlefront alive. When he was confirmed dead, then Haim "Bad Chad" Chaddakah would seize control of the Hell's Angels.

As its international leader, he would provide the Mossad with another intelligence tool, as well as potential assassins. Israeli-produced pharmaceutical products could be distributed worldwide by the Hell's Angels organizations.

From all accounts available to FNP, the spectral Golda was not reassured. Of Barger she sneered: "He is ganef! It is traif! "

According to witnesses, as time passed the Rabbi Noshi tried to placate the angry spirit. He smiled and observed: "My dear Golda, our problem is the Palestinians. They trouble us greatly. Az mir vill schlugen a hunt, gifintmin a schtecken! [If one wants to beat a dog, one finds a stick.]

Suddenly, the visitor from the spirit world began to soften. She seemed to move to the seated rabbi and was observed kissing his hands. As she did, according to one witness, three demons leaped from his fingers, as he had failed to wash his hands that morning.

According to two observers at the seance, the spectral Golda Meir confided: "I came with my Jew's heart and only meant well. Please don't think of me as a muttlemessig."

At that point, FNP was advised that she began to melt away into the air.

First Binyamin Netanyahu, and then the others, cried out: "Zorg dikh nit! Be happy, Golda! All is well."

This fascinating look into one of the high councils of the Israeli state sheds much light on decision-making processes in the pivotal Levantine state. As Lord Byron observed: "Truth is stranger than fiction."

Rabbi Noshi

NETANYAHU DEMANDS "MR. T" LEAVE ISRAELI STATE

2010-10-11T21:06:00.000-07:00

Angry Netanyahu

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

FNP has learned that the controversial Mr.T is under renewed bombardment from the Israeli leader, Binyamin Netanyahu. According to a number of Israeli newspapers, the antagonism between the two has reached a violent, bloodfeud state.
According to famed Israeli media star, Gurli Gur, the feud began shortly after Israeli leaders secured the services of Mr.T to protect the comatose Ariel Sharon in his hospital room. The beloved Israeli general had been stricken by a life-threatening stroke.

Mr. Gurli Gur confirmed that, prior to the employment of Mr.T, a rumor had been circulating in Jerusalem to the effect that the general had been violated in his hospital room by some unknown villain.

To protect General Sharon in his vulnerable state, hospital authorities and Israeli state officials approved hiring Mr.T, whose world-wide reputation in the area of security and bodyguard protection was unequalled.

As is well-known among top intelligence people, Mr.T came to terms with the Israelis and flew to Jerusalem. He set up a security system to protect Ariel Sharon. It was this system that had apparently captured the villain in yet another assault.

According to these reports, the perpetrator was dressed as a nurse. However, the size and speed of the fleeing "nurse" suggested to Mr.T that the nurse was a man. Further, Mr.T's scrutinizing of the video, secretly taped, of everyone entering the room had revealed to him a hazy image. Using imaging techniques to refine the face in the video, Mr.T concluded that it was none other than Binyamin Netanyahu.

Although Mr. Netanyahu always seemed to have been elsewhere at the times of the assaults on General Sharon, Mr.T's own experiences in moviemaking informed him of the possibiility of a body-double having been used.

Now, about this time Curtis Sliwa had led a regiment of Guardian Angels into Palestine to man and secure the borders between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. As a curtesy, Mr. Sliwa stopped by to express his admiration for the righteous work that Mr.T had been doing. They "hit it off" immediately and began to confer regularly.

This relationship deeply angered Mr. Netanyahu. He vowed to friends that he would drive Mr.T, Curtis Sliwa and the Palestians themselves out of Eretz Israel. He told his friends that Ariel Sharon would recover, because all he really needed was love. He stated that General Sharon would one day soon stand "shoulder to shoulder" with him.

While Mr.T was briefing the hospital authorities on the latest incident, he had left Curtis Sliwa to guard Ariel Sharon. According to confidants of the leader of the Guardian Angels, a strange event occurred, while he sat on a chair near the bed of the comatose Sharon.

Apparently, the general's eyes opened briefly and he raised himself on his bed. He looked directly at Curtis and asked, "Are you an angel?" Mr. Sliwa, although surprised, calmly replied, "Yes, I am!" According to these reports, Ariel Sharon shut his eyes again and fell heavily upon his pillow and bed. He never was known to have awakened again.

FNP has confirmed from several usually reliable sources that the blood feud between Binyamin Netanyahu and his allies and Mr.T and his new ally, Curtis Sliwa and the Guardian Angels, was real. This added a new incendiary to the boiling cauldron in the Middle East. How and when it would "blow" was only a guess now. But it was and is our duty as journalists to find the answers somehow.

FNP pledges to its readers that it will pursue the answers to these and related questions in future editions.

FNP: INVESTIGATION OF "ACCIDENTAL" DEATH OF MEDIA MOGUL RUMORED

2010-10-08T21:02:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

Usually informed sources in Wyoming have confirmed rumors among investigative reporters that the police have been exploring new evidence, possibly leading to homicide charges against Donald Graham for the murder of media tycoon, Katherine Meyer Graham. Police will neither confirm nor deny that an investigation had been underway for months.

From sources who would speak only under the condition of anonymity, the outline of this shocking story has surfaced.

According to these sources, persons well-connected to The Washington Post were privy to concerns which Mrs. Graham had expressed in regard to her strange son, Donald. For years, according to these sources, Donald Graham would lock himself in his living quarters and watch Richard Widmark movies. Few people were aware of Donald’s obsession, and Mrs. Graham tried to shield him from curious acquaintances.

Nevertheless, it was known by some that strange “cackling” sounds could be heard streaming from within Donald’s personal digs. To at least one person who actually heard the sound, it had a “crazy” quality that chilled him. It reminded him of the character, Renfield, in Dracula (the Bela Lugosi version). Others claimed that its quality was more crisp than that of the Renfield character.

When expert opinion was sought by one anonymous newshound in regard to the Richard Widmark films that might contain “cackling” sounds, the number one choice was Kiss of Death. Therefore, it seemed to be a good bet that in this film there was hidden some meaningful clue which might have the power to explain the mysterious death of Katherine Graham.

What was it? Were the Wyoming authorities already aware of it and proceeding apace?

People who knew the Grahams well have commented on the charming way that Donald would sneak up on his mother, grab her in a hug, and kiss her, saying, “Kiss of Donnie!" The general view was that she was very lucky to have such a loving son.

None of the Graham acquaintances nor any of the leading figures at The Washington Post would comment on the persistent rumors of a family cursed with insanity over three or four generations.

If this matter was to be investigated by authorities, the Wyoming police would take the lead, but at this point in time they were saying nothing.

2010-10-03T21:29:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

NEWS BRIEF

Recently released information from the Obama White House casts a new light on the "W." Administration's efforts at diplomacy in the Middle East.

There has been a growing sentiment within intelligence circles in the West that Osama bin Laden has fallen in love. According to usually reliable sources working the intelligence beat, Osama has been lying awake at night on his bedding in a cave in Pakistan, staring at a small picture which he had cut from a newspaper some months back. His only light has been a half burnt candle.

According to one clandestine observer who has since fled to the West, Osama has been heard muttering affectionate words to the picture. He has been seen kissing the photograph, sometimes passionately. One clandestine observer has sworn to intelligence debriefers that he had witnessed what must surely be an erection on the leader of al Qaeda, as he ogled the photograph.

Usually reliable sources especially close to French intelligence, have stated that the real reason that Osama bin Laden suddenly appeared to be much younger was that he had dyed his beard “black,” hoping to impress the object of his fiery passion. For this reason, anonymous insiders in the American & Israeli intelligence condominium realized that the object of his love must be someone likely to see Osama’s picture. If she was impressed by his youthful vigor, then she might signal to him that “she’s ready.”

Who was this mystery lady? According to the “turned Osama confidant,” who had sneaked a peek into Osama’s bedroom-in-a-cave, she was none other than Condoleezza Rice, U.S. Secretary of State.

FNP: NOTED ZOOLOGIST LECTURES IN TEL-AVIV

2010-10-03T20:36:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, D.C.:

FNP has learned that Doctor Calvin Clower, a zoologist at the International Institute of Reptiles at San Jose, California, will be flying to Tel-Aviv to give his fifth lecture on the Blue-Throated Wood Lizard. The lecture was scheduled for the third Wednesday in October.

Although not widely known in the United States, Dr. Clower has become a smash-hit in the Israeli state. How did this happen? You may ask.

According to a source that was very close to the founders of the Blue-Throated Movement, the relationship was improbable at the outset. It occurred this way:

Dr. Clower had been lecturing at various academic and theological sites within India, comparing Shiva and the Blue-Throated One. The brilliance of his lectures created much intellectual ferment there.

Apparently, on his way back to America he stopped over in the Israeli state.

His arrival was brought to the attention of certain rabbis, led by Rabbi Zvi ha’Locknclop, who urged him to speak briefly, even informally, to their group. Dr. Clower agreed. His speech was greeted by astonishment, followed by near hysterical excitement. According to our source, these rabbis loved it and were mesmerized by what the doctor had said. They begged him to return for a formal presentation. He agreed, and a date was set.

By this time the word had gotten around. Dr. Clower spoke in a large, SRO chamber to a group of eminent rabbis and scholars. He spoke with ardency and brilliance about the Blue-Throated Wood Lizard. There were tears in many eyes. These were not tears of sadness but of great joy.

According to Gurli Gur, the famed Israeli media star, the Jewish love affair with the Blue-Throated Wood Lizard was now “outed.” Everyone in Jerusalem, Tel-Aviv, Haifa, Ailat and every place in-between spoke about the Blue-Throated One. In religious schools students, preparing to be scholarly rabbis, could - not infrequently - be seen with blue-painted necks.

As Gurli Gur pointed out, Dr. Clower had become a celebrity in the Jewish state. His next lecture was televised. Jewish businessmen vied with each other to contract with Dr. Clower to vend his DVDs, books, and novelty items.
It was this “Blue-Throated Mania,” according to usually reliable sources, that inspired government leaders to set aside a natural reserve to house American Blue-Throated Wood Lizards. It would be a perfect environment for them. Israeli citizens could view them on display in a perfectly simulated natural environment. Jewish scientist would attempt to breed them as well.

If the Israeli state has replaced California as America’s “bell-weather” state, which points toward our future, then FNP predicts that ordinary Americans would become a lot more familiar with the little, swaggering reptile.

Out of curiosity, FNP conducted an informal poll of Washingtonians, asking them what they thought of the Blue-Throated Wood Lizard. Many respondents guessed that it was a Japanese movie monster. Others just shrugged their shoulders or smiled in puzzlement. As Gurli Gur quipped about America, “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”

Nevertheless, FNP has learned from Texas sources that have proved reliable in the past that Minister John Hagee and a delegation from his congregation were planning to fly to the Israeli state, where they planned to present 1,000 Blue-Throated Wood Lizards to the Netanyahu government. If this story proved to be true, and it has the ring of truth, then the news about the magnificent, mysterious lizard has already reached our shores.

FNP intends to keep an eye on this story. If a Blue-Throated Movement develops in America, we will be the first to let you know.

FNP: DEATH IN SAFARI-LAND

2010-09-26T20:33:00.000-07:00

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

NEWS BRIEF

FNP has learned that a terrible accident has recently occurred at the posh private reserve in south Texas known as African Safari-Land & Spa. A young man who worked as a caddy at the prestigious 36-hole golf course that adjoins the wild game reserve at Safari-Land was killed in an accident, involving former Vice President Richard "Dick" Cheney.

According to usually reliable sources, the caddy may have been involved in drug trafficking. He apparently was armed and, when accidentally encountering the former VP in the rough near a fence that separates the animal reserve from the golf course, he drew his handgun to fire.

Mr. Cheney, who was armed with a high-powered rifle that he was using to hunt oystrich, hoping to have the trophy made into boots, leveled his weapon on the caddy and fired. Both men were hit. According to a Saudi Arabian official who requested anonymity, he was part of a group, including Mr. Cheney and an undisclosed member of the Bush family, who were hunting in the reserve that morning. He stated that the wounded caddy was screaming and writhing on the ground just inside the fence at the rough of the golf course. He witnessed the wounded and enraged VP go to the fence, aim his rifle, and fire into the caddy a death wound. All agreed that this was an accident and mercy killing, as the caddy could not be saved, considering his grievous wounds.

Other usually reliable sources have told FNP, strictly on the basis of not for attribution, that the caddy appeared to have a backpack full of packages of white material. However, subsequent searches of the golf course area near the accident reportedly resulted in no unusual discoveries.

Richard Cheney was rushed to a hospital for treatment and later transferred to a hospital closer to his home. There, he was reported to have had a "heart procedure" done. The good news is that the former VP seems to be on the mend.

FNP is further investigating the expensive, exclusive, members-only African Safari-Land & Spa and intends upon getting a fuller story. We believe that there is more here than meets the eyes.

NEW DEAL BLOGGING

2010-09-26T19:49:00.000-07:00

This site will feature some of Faux News Press' media releases. The breaking reports of the day that are typically ignored by the major media outlets are staples at "FNP." They will continue to publish at Bravenet.com as well. Faux News Press originally was published at WordPress.com, as part of the Nomoonnight blog. However, the power of Nomoonnight's material was unacceptable to their "liberal" environment at WordPress.com, as they had no defense against facts and truth, which are usually consigned to the trashcan as material omissions in major media and academia. In short Nomoonnight was "suspended" after over 100 pithy blogs had been published, and all the blogs were incarcerated in a no-visitors concentration camp to await extermination. It was a privilege granted to WordPress.com by its "rules" and, hence, no explanation was required and certainly not offered.

Parenthetically, some of the retros at WordPress.com have tried to publish "simulated" Faux News Press material. Naturally, it lacked genius, given the sources.

THE ATTACK OF THE SHELL CHRISTIANS

2010-08-25T23:14:00.000-07:00

Unruly events occurred on July 21, 2010. A convention of bogus Christians had gathered at the Convention Center in Washington, D.C. According to American Free Press, which provided some coverage of this affair, Medea Benjamin, who has criticized some policies of the Israeli state, as well as AFP's employee, John Tiffany, who both observed the strange affair and who implicitly affirmed that Zionism was not the Way of Christ, found themselves dodging a Hageeite running amok with a "war club." For their peaceful protest they were treated as if they had been casting out demons with the help of the devil.

The specific group of shell Christians referenced here were the followers of Zionist servant, John Hagee. He has been such a good puppy that his masters have rewarded him with a 5000 acres ranch in Texas and enough financial support that he can two-step through the tulips all the rest of his days. He's a millionaire.

The Hageeites have no shame about their vulgar riches, as they believe that they were "blessings" that naturally followed their "blessing" of Jews according to the Abrahamic Covenant. In this sense, they are at one with the followers of the late, Masonic preacher, Jerry Falwell, who would never criticize the Jews for fear of the "curse" that would befall those who "curse" the Jews.

Naturally, these Learned Elders of Bogus Christianity deleted from their minds the weighty problem that the Abrahamic Covenant didn't apply to the descendants of Esau. Since John Hyrcanus coerced the only large population of Edomites known (Idumaia [Greek term for Edom]) into conversion to Judaism, the only certain descendants of Esau resided within the Jewish population. In the time of Jesus Christ that would include Herod, his wife, Caiphus, most high priests and probably the Temple Guard.

Furthermore, Jacob-Israel, as he neared death, made Ephraim and Manasseh the inheritors of the Promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Therefore, they went with the Northern Kingdom into Assyrian Bondage and never returned. The Children of the Promise went into Europe primarily, becoming the Celto-Germanic people. The Children of the Promise were replanted, as was prophesied in Samuel. They never followed after the Jews; the Jews pursued them with the enmity that one would expect from the Children of Esau.

If Jews are a destined people, it is the destiny to be the heart and soul of the AntiChrist of Revelation. They have never, as a people, been "of Christ's flock" nor have they, as a group, "heard his voice." A small percentage have perceived Jesus Christ as their "Lord and Savior." This attests to the greatness of God. Even a people written into the Great Drama as the chief antagonist has been allowed to produce a few who have found Grace. As with any playwright, God is the author of the good, as well as the bad. He cannot affirm the bad, but after the play, all are restored. At close of the curtain the players, good characters and bad, one by one take their place under the light, and there is no more darkness.

We are not at the latter point. Bad behavior can be very real indeed.

Gary Bauer, a malicious midget, was reported to have used "salty" words, when "documents of change" were presented him. He would not be denied his companionship with the idol-worshipping shell Christians inside the Convention Center, for whom the land of Israel (sic) has become a graven image. They do not understand that The Most High doesn't live there anymore, and that Jesus Christ will bring His Kingdom where the Israelite Christians are, rather than where the Edomite Jews reside as an official nation.

Attending the Hageeite gathering as a sort of "Fruit of Edom" were "representatives" of Israel (sic), as well as American Jews of the hairy, nasty sort. Frank Gaffney was there. Also, Michael Medved made it. Perhaps the most influencial individual there was Jewish billionaire, Mortimer Zuckerman.

Although this meeting cannot be compared with one for the American-Israel Political Action Committee in terms of hordes of U.S. senators and representatives attending, Representative Eric Cantor (R-VA), Representative Mike Pence (R-Ind.), and former Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) made the scene. Hageeite gatherings don't seem to be as compelling to Democrat politicians.

Although Jews contribute more than 50% of the money gathered in by the Democrat Party, one can see a different approach being used to influence Republicans. Somehow or other Mammon always seems to be at the guts of either party's motivation. Vanity may run a close second.

The peaceful protest against Israeli violence that AFP observed was perversely met by not only violent words but violent deeds. A follower of John Hagee and Gary Bauer, incensed at righteousness, initiated an attack on Mr. Tiffany. Not content with this assault, he followed with an attack on Ms. Benjamin, who was a leader of Code Pink which is a pro-peace organization.

According to witnesses, there were Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police at the scene of violence, who did nothing. There was, of course, the possibility that Mayor Fenty had ordered a "stand down" attitude in the face of crime. Public relations has been very important to District mayors, since Marion Barry involuntarily went public in a very negative video. Riling the Hageeites might not have seemed to be a desirable course.

At any rate one witness to the assault on Mr. Tiffany stated, "The assailant's name, based on his name tag, appeared to be Harold Lightstone and it appeared that he was from the state of New Jersey. The assailant was an older man, considerably taler and heavier than Ms. Benjamin, who is a slight, slender woman. The assailant used a heavy carrying bag - possibly laden with weights - which he wielded as a weapon, swinging it at Mr. Tiffany repeatedly, shouting angrily and loudly as he did so. Mr. Tiffany did not strike back; rather, he attempted to make his way away from the attacker who continued his assault until surrounded by others who were seeking to stop him." [American Free Press, August 2, 2010, p. 11]

Violence in the name of Baalim and Mammon seem to be primary attributes of the Israelis and their shell Christian supporters. Both groups, assuming there is a real demarcation somewhere, support a nuclear attack on Iran (and anyone else that they conjure up as an "enemy" of Israel (sic). For them the world cannot be made into a safe place until it is destroyed. After the Earthly Holocaust, they envision "love in the ruins." Jewry will be resurrected; its puppy will be at its side.

JUDGING DIVERSITY

2010-05-16T19:58:00.000-07:00

Here come de judge!

The Freemasonic hero, Justice Stephens, has decided to step down. I say "Freemasonic" not because I know him to be a "Brother," but because his opinions and voting pattern secured his status. The liberal idiom is the Masonic idiom. When that liberalism is expressed by opinions completely at one with the Masonic watchwords of "liberty, equality, fraternity," then the issue is sealed. When those opinions reflect also the new Masonic watchword of "tolerance," then it is double sealed.

Freemasons pride themselves on being radicals and revolutionaries. Always, they point out the numerous Masons involved in the formation of the United States of America. If any of these "Founding Fathers" also made allusion to the work of the Constitution or to the practical application of its principles in terminology suggesting that it was protean and meant to be fashioned by the hysterical mob in any way that seemed good, then one can be certain that present day Masons will seize upon it to promote the current agenda.

Whatever one might say about the Founding Fathers, they did put their thoughts in writing. They clearly established a nation. They clearly established rules and regulations for its operation. Such concepts as "the General Wellfare" were specifically stated.

Contemporary Masons are working to establish a real global nation, that will be composed of somewhat soverign nation-states. They (Masons) have not brought forth an amendment to place before the voters, which allowed the nation's leaders - in their wisdom - to change the sovereign United States of America into a "global team player" shorn of much of its independence of action. They have simply done it.

Their "tools" as builders of a global "democracy" have been treaties, wars, and international corporate businesses and financial enterprises. Treaties were favored in America because the U.S. Constitution provides solid backing for them as "laws of the land." No supreme Court has ever voided their effects, if they were not directly inimicable to the fundamental "Law of the Land." Virtually all these treaties nibble at national sovereignty. They should be entitled "Threaties."

International finance is every bit as revolutionary as international communism ever was. The world has not been conquered by determined proletariats but by amiable debt-mongers, setting the world up for a debt-ridden culture of near property-less serfs. In the words of 20th Century German mogul, Walter Rathenau: "Half the world produces dross and the other half buys it." Minus its "feel-good" prose, that appears to be the future which Masonic "Builders" are building.

I freely acknowledge the "magic" of God's Earth to reveal secrets that bail humankind out of a seemingly dark and doomy future. Perhaps, that will happen again. If it does not, look for beaucoup trouble ahead.

Masons belong to a brotherhood of builders. Rebuilding the Temple in Jerusalem was and is a premier goal. They also like to talk about this in metaphorical ways. Masonic thinkers in the West have always been at the forefront of the Eastern mystical craze that struck England, its Commonwealth, and America in the late '50s and steamrolled forward. Consciousness-Raising and Evolution were both promoted by Masons. These ideas were intrinsic to the Mystery Religions. All of the latter have easily reckonized influences based upon concepts found in the Cabalah.

Can Masonic "team-players" across the globe rebuild the world, repairing its "flaws?"

They tend to be "cockeyed optimists" and believe that if the global population can be cut to between 500 million and 1 billion people, then the resources of the Earth and its population can be brought into equalibrium.

How do you eliminate some 6 billion or so people in a fashion not likely to "raise eyebrows?"

One way is to create "terrorists" with which to threaten the people. The terrorists would be real. Usable personalities would be manipulated into action, funded, provided access to plenty of lethal weapons, and released to run amok working out their imagined grievances. Urban environments - by definition - have the most "expendable" human potential. Remote areas would be perfect for genocide.

Additionally, American forces, allied forces, and United Nations' forces could be sent to many places on the globe to fight terrorists and/or insurrectionists (anti-"Democratic" factions). If they can't find any terrorists to kill, then they could - ooops! - smart-bomb some harmless citizens here and there. Also, stirring up factions within a territory, arming them, and letting them kill each other adds to the body count.

Still, these casualties amount to "flesh wounds" in the total gore required to get the population down to Masonically-manageable ranges. There has got to be a limited mass destruction now and then. Hydrogen bombs would help. However, pandemics appear to be the new shining hope of Masonry to cut the human numbers. Since Masons control many pharmaceutical companies, each of which operates globally, then "accidental" releases of deadly biological diseases, et al, would seem to be a good approach. Lethal diseases should be much quicker than dying of thirst or for lack of healthy food.

In regard to the latter the movie documentary "Super-Size It" suggested that six weeks of constant McDonald's food might kill all on the diet. For Freemasons this may seem the humane, free-enterprise, systemic approach to the problem defined by the population/resources equation.

Since we view Freemasonry as the "feel-good" flipside of the Jewish Tikkun olam ("repair of the world"), and, therefore, a part of the World Jewish Agenda (millionaire Jewish politician [NJ] Corzine's expression), we believe that Ms. Kagan will be a "shue in" as Justice Stephens' replacement.

With the seating of Ms. Kagan diversity will be established as a principle of our "democratic" government. She will bring the percent of known Jewish judges on the supreme Court to 33 1/3%. That's not "chopped liver" for a group that totals about 4-5% of the nation's population.

With the other 66 2/3 % justices said to be Roman Catholics, reasoned thought and freedom of expression seem doomed. There will be a high, thick wall built to exclude bonafides Christian influences, while criticism of the "Holocaust," the State of Israel (sic), or Jewry will not be tolerated. [This is the Masonic exception that proves the rule.]

You think this foolish talk? The jibber-jabber of a clown?

The Papal denunciation of the English Bishop Williamson's profession of disbelief in the "Holocaust" crossed directly into the path of a non-Catholic doctrine (i.e. non-Christian) to remonstrate against a rational belief. Why?

The "Holocaust" is clearly a Jewish Messianic doctrine that was conceived as a replacement doctrine for Jesus Messianic doctrine, which was and is the heart of Christianity. If the "Holocaust" can be put over, then Christianity should wither away. Whatever remnant remained could be eliminated on any of many pretexts.

URANIANS? NEO-URANIANS? SAY WHAT?

2010-03-29T21:08:00.000-07:00

Occasionally, I run into a blog that I believe is sufficiently special to host. This post by Downnlaced deserved this acknowledgement. See below for why that is.

In life one can observe many oddities. Prominent during the last thirty years has been the rise to the level of Establishment of leading elements of the homosexual-rights movement. In the process they and their allies have done yeoman duty “cleansing” the public image of homosexuals and homosexuality. Important assistance was provided by the various media, wherein homosexuality is alleged to be more than “one in ten” by credible observers. Indeed, I recall the old Spotlight tabloid mentioning in an article that an organized homosexual group approached newspapers and other media outlets to lobby against “negative” stories appearing in them about homosexuals. In this they must have operated upon the pattern set by the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith ["ADL"] in its early years of power-grabbing and intimidation. Now, of course, no Establishment type or organization would dare criticize the ADL. The same “respect” may some day soon be shown to the organized homosexual groups.

Certainly, one would correctly expect a positive attitude to be evident in the likes of The Washington Post, whose liberal face is apparent, although not necessarily admitted. Because the Post has typically been associated with the “war makers”–at least at the outset of war, when the body bags rest empty in their boxes, it has viewed itself as “centrist” and “responsible” in its editorials and overall reportage. Those who have views which are opposed to the expressed Postian views are “far-out” and “irresponsible.”

The expressions uttered by the Post since its purchase by Eugene Meyer during its “fire-sale” under Depression-Era duress has been essentially Trotskyitish. The Marxist programs have been supported in America by the Post, while the Trotsky affirmation of violence against (wrong-thinking) neighbors finds symmetry in the Post’s support of violence by Imperial Federal U.S., as one would expect of secret admirers of The Internationalists’ war against “middle-classism.”

Parenthetically, the middle-class in America is the pathetic category of people who desperately strive against falling into paisano status by supporting the rich, whose fervent wish [is] to eliminate the middle class in favor of “Lords & Serfs” as a global “ideal.” The dictatorship of the rich will be disguised as “democracy.”

Lest anyone suppose that I have a peculiar animosity toward The Washington Post, let me hasten to comment that all the major media have progressed along a similar road. Were that not true, there would be something akin to media wars–not in the sense of financial cannibalism & merger–but at the level of ideas. Only small newspapers and the like provide a consistent alternate view. These sorts of people, who control the major media, enforce a policy which is, in effect, one of material omission. That’s good enough for some people–some humdrum people–to read. I want a lot more, myself.

Therefore, given the Marxists’ expressed solidarity with the homosexual movement, the support of America’s major media outlets was a given. “International business” leaders, educated often enough at the “best schools,” found policy solidarity very easy to impose on their “company culture[s].” Academia, crawling with members of the homosexual movement, likewise imposed “liberal policies,” which tended to be very “embracive.” Opponents are invariably likened to Hitler, or other bete noir of the internationalist liberal movement. “We are pink,” gloats the Financial Times of London in its frontpage heading. Indeed, its correlatives in America can easily say the same–and I don’t refer merely to media.

The color “pink” is meant to suggest that its bearers are not full-bore “reds,” which generally connotes “blood-spilling revolution now!” The “pinks” are for a gentler road to global socialism, relying on cultural changes, demographic changes, and time. ["The old die; the young forget."] As the Beatles noted in a song: “There’s nothing to get hung up about.” Put down your Communist carbines, and give “love” a chance, seemed to be affirmed as a weigh station along the road to the global paradise of the rich. The “pinks” don’t want a world war. That is too destructive. They seem to approve of endless small wars around the globe to nudge the people toward their future of “toil, sex, drugs, and body-organ ‘donation.’”

Why do I bring up all this extraneous material, considering the title of this post? Because I believe that the homosexual movement in America (and elsewhere) has far more in common with Marxism than a mere category of sexuality. I believe that the selection of the color “pink” as emblematic has more to do with the ideology reflected in the front page heading of the Financial Times than the suggestion that it implies a female-esque orientation. The “homosexual liberation movement” was an important part of the broader ”sexual revolution” which was planned and implemented in conjunction with new developments in birth control. Women were “liberated” from fear of pregnancies, and that liberation, aided by propaganda, helped to propel the social changes which were also being redefined by the “black liberation movement.”

While these “movements” were not alone, I believe that these three were the ramrods of social legislation and “supreme Court” social interpretations of policies and law. A victory of any one of these movements in the courts tended to be applied to the others. They were defined as minorities, even when majorities.

The “pill” not only liberated women from fears and moral strictures in existance for thousands of years, but the broad & massive addition of “mind-altering” drugs shortly after the advent of the “pill” created the “loose” thinking that translated into across-the-board immorality, according to previous Christian doctrines. Such usage made it easy for women who adopted the “new morality” to forget their pills.

The result, naturally, was unwed pregnancies. This led to the creation of increasing numbers of confused offspring, exhibiting a marked inclination toward criminal behavior. Another result was ever-increasing use of abortion. The latter required an “adjustment” in religious views on this subject, as well as the coersive power of the State, as it implemented “supreme Court” decisions favoring abortion.

Parenthetically, one of the unnoticed aspects of these liberation movements was an increasing use of spies, “intelligence” machinery, and applied police enforcement across the country in an increasingly pervasive form. As the “Bill of Rights” became a neutered document, individuals became more conscious of the possibility of a new American Police State. With confused people everywhere in America declaiming loudly vain imaginings, there was no chance that such a mob could derail the revolution in their midst.

Another aspect of this “sexual revolution” was increasing hybridization of the population. That this was a planned aspect of the “pink revolution” is certain, as there are at least several prominent Jewish figures who gloat about the coming extinction of white people, per se, in a new world order. This was certain because white people were too dumb, too feckless, and too corrupt to stop it. Hence, a “world without white people” was very much a premeditative part of the “sexual revolution.”

Still another aspect of this “sexual revolution” was the unprecedented rise of venereal diseases. These diseases tend to be intractable. Some could be cure by wonder drugs, yet,–wouldn’t you know it?–some proved damnably resistant to the old treatments. Yet, with so many Americans “blitzed” on drugs and booze, who’s going to be vigilant? Further, some diseases that arose proved deadly. The homosexual revolutionaries were smitten hard in their doctrine.

No one said that revolution was going to be a pleasant stroll through a comely rose garden. There were expectations of regrettable “losses.”

It is not an accident that a successful effort was begun in the ’70s to impose the term “gay” upon the category of people who engage in sodomy, et al. Its use in literary works, such as Tennessee Williams’ plays, suggests that it has an even older birth period. But its insistent usage I believe, at least in America, began in the 1970s. The groundwork for its acceptance rests with its general positioning in a broad class of humanity, whose relative position improved mightily during the last 100 years.

Previously, these sets of people existed under a negative pale. With the help of “new ideas” advanced within the relatively new pedagogic field dubbed the “soft sciences,” they became minorities, who were basically like others–only misunderstood. Furthermore, this very movement evolved into one that asserted that “we are all alike,” gruffly brushing aside or ignoring data that suggested otherwise.” Soft science” came to prevail over “hard science,” when politicians and judges began to “scratch their heads” as to the correct course to take. This assumes that “dodging the issue is no longer a possible option.

Who were these avant-garde thinkers of the new soft sciences? They certainly included such prominent figures as Franz Boas, Claude Levi-Strauss, Otto Klineberg, Melville Herskovits, Alexander Goldenweiser, Isador Chein, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Gene Weltfish, Kenneth Clark, Ruth Benedict and Margaret Mead.

A look at two is revealing enough. Consider:

“…Perhaps in the belief that one good myth deserves another, Franz Boas (1858-1942), a scholar of German-Jewish origin and a professor of anthropology at Columbia University, put forward the first comprehensively developed theory of racial equality. Boas hypothesized that nurture, not nature, was the chief determinant of important racial differences. He went so far as to assert that even such a persistent genetic trait as head shape (cephalic index) could be altered by an environmental change in one or two generations…” [THE DISPOSSESSED MAJORITY,(3rd revised ed.), Wilmot Robertson, p.14]

Well, many would agree that the last-mentioned supposition was a bit “cock-eyed.” But let’s consider another prominent figure.

“Ashley Montagu, a physical anthropologist of Anglo-Jewish origin, became the great vulgarizer of racial equalitarianism with a seemingly endless stream of bestselling books, television appearances and speeches before learned and unlearned societies.” [supra, pp.14-15]

I recall seeing Mr. Montagu on late-night television programs of the “Johnny Carson Show” sort. He was an engaging sort, making for a good propagandist. Let’s consider one more prominent figure in the “shape-changing” field of academia, which has given birth to most of our injurious policies in government.

“Perhaps the most interesting of all theories that attempt to account for the current Jewish ascendancy is that advanced by John Murray Cuddihy, an assistant professor of sociology and a scion of a prominent Irish-American family. In Cuddihy’s view, Freud, Marx, Claude Levi-Strauss, and other prominent Diaspora Jews, who have done so much to bruise Western culture, were not impelled by their love of truth or their desire to improve mankind, but by their fear and loathing of Western civility, the repressed and controlled behavior that is incomprehensible to an irrepressible people. Since they obviously could not get away with a direct attack on Gentile conduct, they consciously or unconsciously worked out highly ramified interpretations of history, economics, politics, psychology, and anthropology to undermine it. Communism was an ideal weapon to divide and destroy the Western political and economic order. Freudianism attacked Western morality by its neurotic emphasis on sex and by lending respectability to the promptings of the baser instincts. Levi-Strauss’s anthropology compared savage and civilized societies to the disadvantage of the latter. Cuddihy even hints that Einstein’s physics was motivated in part by a desire to shock and shatter rather than refine and advance Western science.” [supra, p.189]

Now all this dovetails very well with the new approach of Marxism, as developed by Antonio Gramsci of Italy (born in Sardinia) in the 1920s & ’30s. Consider:

“Use Lenin’s geopolitical structure not to conquer streets and cities, argued Gramsci. Use it to conguer the mind of civil society. Use it to acquire a Marxist hegemony over the minds of the populations that must be won.” [THE KEYS OF THIS BLOOD, Malachi Martin, p.249]

There does not seem to be any doubt that the American Entertainment industry, as well as the informational media, have done yeoman work, according to Comrade Gramsci’s prescription for victory. One hardly ever encounters a nonJew in America who doesn’t seem completely at one with the “change.” Change is good–right?

Indeed! Among the “wall of scoundrels” advancing toward Jerusalem to be born were the Neo-Uranians, which was a group that first seemed to manifest itself in an organized way during the last part of the 19th century in Germany, especially. Whether these were mostly Germans, or others residing in Germany is not clear. Given the character of known revolutionary forces, there is reason to be cautious. Still, before the homosexual revolution grew powerful here in America, it manifested itself in 19th century Germany. Consider:

“As we move closer to modern times, we see that during the Masonic revolutions throughout Europe in the nineteenth century, laws restraining homosexuality were relaxed. Tannahill informs us that in France ‘by the 1860s homosexuality and lesbianism were, if not commonplace, at least tolerated.’” [SCARLET AND THE BEAST, Vol. II, John Daniel, p.63]

Now, I think it wise to point out that the influence on American politics and religion of Freemasons is marked. If there is a “sexual revolution” or “moral revolution” in America, it cannot occur without widespread Masonic assistance. As an example of a typical Freemason in American politics, one might adduce the life and times of the late Senator Strom Thurman, who pronounced Freemasonry to be “love,” who was an alleged womanizer (frequently eating oysters to “promote” libidinous excess), and apparently fathered a child or two out of wedlock.

Freemasonry is not a friend of sexual temperance. Since most American men define their “maleness” in terms of “body count”–real or imagined, the leadership offered by Freemasonry was certainly welcomed. Let’s continue with our study of Uranians/Neo-Uranians.

“This was due in part to the efforts of a homosexual organization founded in 1862 called the Urnings, or Uranians, named after the Greek god Uranus. In 1893 the Urnings founded their own secret society called ‘The Order of Chaeronea,’ with rituals, insignia, and secret codes patterned after Freemasonry. The Chaeronea Lodge planned to organize all homosexuals into a political force, which they heretofore were unable to do. Germany was their target. They would infiltrate the imperial court for the purpose of cutting the emperor off from his more responsible advisers, thereby influencing German society so they could practice their lifestyle openly and freely. By the turn of the twentieth century, militant homosexuals were heavily involved in German politics…” [supra, p.63]

My interpretation of this passage includes the view that the Uranians were seeking a sort of autonomy within German society. The only people to exhibit this desire for autonomy within a host country for over two thousand years were the Jews. If Freemasonry itself is a Jewish “Trojan horse,” operating within countless nations across the globe, then the aspirations of the “Chaeronea Lodge” were consistent with Jewish and Masonic history. Please perceive that the opposed forces MUST have been Christians in lands such as 19th century Germany. Let’s conclude our citation on the Uranians.

“Their scheme, however, was exposed by a Berlin publisher. Tannahill tells the story: ‘In 1906, Maximilian Harden, publisher of the Berlin periodical Die Zukunft, decided to open everyone’s eyes, including those of the emperor, to the dangers of an Urnings’ alliance. These people formed…a comradeship which is stronger than that of the monastic orders or of Freemasonry, which grips tighter and makes a link across all the walls of creed, state, and class, which unites the most remote, the most foreign, in a fraternal league of offense and defense. Men of this breed are to be found everywhere, at courts, in high positions in armies and navies, in the editorial offices of great newspapers, at tradesmen’s and teachers’ desks. even on the bench. All rally together against the common enemy.‘

“The common enemy was the German imperial state. Allied with the Urnings was the German Communist Party, operating from within the Grand Orient Masonic Lodges. Hence, public opinion generated by the lodges favored sexual emancipation….” [supra,pp.63-64]

Although the view expressed above supposes that the “common enemy” was the German imperial state, I believe that this was merely the first target, which had to be neutralized first to better destroy the larger targets: the German people, per se, and Christianity. Be that as it may, let’s continue with the Communist view of the Uranians.

"Felix Halle, spokesman for the German Communist Party, summarized the party’s opinion on the subject during the first decade of the twentieth century: ‘The class-conscious proletariat, uninfluenced by the ideology of the churches, approaches the question of sex life and also the problem of homosexuality with a lack of prejudice afforded by an understanding of the overall social structure….In accordance with the scientific insights of modern times, the proletariat regards these relations as a special form of sexual gratification and demands the same freedom and restrictions for these forms of sex life as for intercourse between the sexes [such as] control over one’s own body and finally respect for the rights of non-involved parties.’ " [supra, p.64]

The language and concepts found within this early 19th century communist tract are virtually the exact concepts pushed by “Women’s Lib” spokespersons, such as Barbara Friedan, Gloria Steiner, Susan Brownmiller, Germaine Greer, Bella Abzug, and a host of other Jewish thinker-activists. They are also the same concepts pushed by the “Gay” movement. Nothing much has changed here, except their batting average is better. With much of Christian leadership corrupt or incompetent, there is little to stand in their way. Here, I speak not just of the sexual revolution but the broad range of revolutionary changes constantly being pushed. The inevitable conclusion will be national destructoion, which has also been planned.

Please note: with college students supposing that the Communist Revolution has been destroyed and is a mere relic of the past, the revolution has won. Those who live in its midst are so imbued with its doctrines that they don’t even see it. Why? It’s everywhere! The revolutionary changes have become their nannies. They are uncomfortable anywhere else.

The past known records of the original Uranians point inevitably to their resurfacing with spectacular success in America from post-’60s forward under the new title of “Gay Movement.” Todays Gays are worthy disciples of the Uranians. Their idiom is “ur-anus.” For this reason I dub them all: Neo-Uranians. They are part of the Establishment.
[Downnlaced, 2008

MY PANTHERS ARE BETTER THAN YOURS

2009-11-28T21:51:00.000-08:00

Recently, I stumbled upon a newspaper headline to the effect that the ruling remnant of the Black Panthers Party of the unruly 60's were denouncing a group organized under the title, The New Black Panther Party. I immediately recognized the potential for a circus center-ring attraction.

Imagine the "old guard" Black Panthers decked out in their refurbished duds confronting the the young lions of The New Black Panther Party. Who dares enter the cage to crack the whip with these angry cats snarling?

It takes a good imagination. Bobby Seale, I believe, is an elected representative and member of the Black Caucus. In socialist America the old Black Panthers are establishment types. The widow of Huey Newton helps run a foundation which does at least some work in the African American 'hoods. "Trying" and rhetoric keep the old memories from death by burial under the relentless accumulation of dust that is modern life's emblem. It takes on a somber, aged, traditional character - unable to live and unwilling to die.

Additionally, there may be some money that comes now and then to the Keepers of the Legend. The old boys get together sometimes to talk about their "legacy" over drinks.

Imagine then the unwanted character of surprise that seized them when members of The New Black Panther Party ["NBPP"] started showing their stuff and being "bad." Further, the NBPP appeared to be related somehow to the Nation of Islam and Louis Farrakhan. Hence, the old guard had to wonder if they were hostile to the Jewish community, which had been so understanding and supportive of the original Black Panther Party. This new group of "Black Panthers" might just be a different kind of cat.

While the old Black Panthers used to follow police cars patrolling their 'hoods, brandishing their guns and pointedly talking about "offing the pig," the stately remnant now speaks about their "love" for their people and desire to help the 'hoods. Get it? They got bad press! That's all. They were part of the emerging socialist international, supported by foundations, such as (probably) the Ford Foundation. Hell! Eldredge Cleever was so avantgarde that he tried to re-invent the "codpiece" for modern pants. If that's not Establishment, what is?

However, the NBPP didn't seem to catch the Black Panthers' groove. These name-stealers wanted to create a separate black nation called "New Africa." They were nationalists, doncha know? So yesterday! The old guard chuckled: "They'll never get Ford money."

Recently, at the elections of November members of the NBPP were occasionally present outside voting locations, dressed in their uniforms and carrying weapons. They were accused of trying to intimidate voters. They have intentionally set out to be confrontational toward "enemies of the Black people."

Do the old Black Panther Party remnant misread the times? Consider:

"In June, White House Communications Director Anita Dunn told a St. Andrews high school graduating class, 'Two of my favorite political philosophers are Mao Tse-Tung and Mother Teresa.' Similarly, manufacturing czar Ron Bloom informed the 2008 Union League Club, 'We know that the free market is nonsense. We kind of agree with Mao that political power comes largely from the barrel of a gun.'" [American Free Press, Staff Report, page 6, Nov. 30, 2009]

I bring this up because the thinking of the NBPP seems to be much more - for real - akin to the Mao dictum than the stylish posing of the original Black Panthers. Since the latter were relentlessly outgunned by the police, their power can only come through "pet-ship" on the part of the real "power elite" of America, who thought them cute and useful to frighten old white women (reliable voters) and who also controlled the police.

Whether or not the NBPP is annexed eventually by the "power elite" and converted into a street drama scene at the Smithsonian may well depend upon their acceptance of Jews as the world's messiah.

WASHINGTON POST VENTS HATE CRIME VERBIAGE

2009-10-20T17:24:00.000-07:00

After the Washington Post launched a fusillade of "hate crime" verbiage at Mr. Robert F. McDonnell, Republican candidate for governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, old-time political observers were left to scratch their heads. What's with the Post? Although the Post had clearly indicated that it favored Mr. Creigh Deeds, the Democrat candidate, it had benefited from the advertisements of Republican McDonnell. This was achieved by the fact that the McDonnell campaign had cited The Washington Post for making favorable comments about aspects of the McDonnell "program for Virginia," and thereby acknowledging the Post as an important observer whose analysis demanded respect. Because the McDonnell campaign also cited the Post as commenting critically about aspects of the Deeds "program for Virginia," it had suggested that the Post was somehow "fair and balanced" in its commentary on this election race. In short the McDonnell campaign had exalted the role of the Post in the Virginia contest for governor, even though it clearly had chosen Creigh Deeds as the best man for governor. By citing the Post's observations on "nuts-n-bolts" in some aspect of the campaign, the McDonnell people seemed to think they were neutralizing the Post.

Far from neutralizing the Post, which has always been a "junkyard dog" in pettycoats and perfume, the McDonnell campaign witnessed itself being made the target of one of the most intemperate rants ever launched by The Washington Post. After this tirade, one wonders how this newspaper can ever piously denounce "hate crimes" again.

The problem may rests with the publisher, one Ms. Weymouth, who is said to suffer from some sort of bi-polar disorder. Flights of mood are not a congenial characteristic for measured, rational discourse. The unstable pronouncements of the Post are suggestive of an institution atilt. Washingtonians are hopeful that an elevated vision can be achieved by this news outlet, but in truth, when a person or an institution fall out of grace with its center, where is there to go but down?

YOUR HOUSE IS MY HOUSE!

2009-08-27T15:22:00.000-07:00

I'm all for immigration. I'm all for order. Not surprisingly, I'm for immigration by design by U.S. representatives who represent the desire and will of the people.

Design is unthinkable without reasoning. Throughout America there are signs of design in its infrastructure. Some might be surprised to learn that our highways were actually designed. Our railroads were actually designed. Buildings are designed. Even a school's curriculum is designed. States even demand that a certain curriculum be taught as a standard. This cannot be done without reasoning what is the educational aim, how it is to be attained, and what are the best tools by which to achieve these goals. Yes, although the educational establishment hates to admit it, even they must think.

However, in regard to immigration, reasoning and standards don't apply. Certainly, pretexts are offered to excuse the chaos. What is going on?

One needs to go back to cryptic messages that illuminated individuals have left behind. Of primary interest is the expression: Out of Chaos, Order. This slogan appears on the "Jewel" of the 33rd degree Mason at the top of the central emblem as "ORDO AB CHAO." It includes other symbols, such as the triple, intertwined triangles and the serpent biting its own tail. Both are meant to connect to the Mystery Religions of old.

It is not my intention to delve into Masonic symbols in this blog. It is only to connect Masonry at its highest levels with the term, "Order Out of Chaos" or "Out of Chaos, Order." It is a factual statement that many of the presidents of the United States have been Masons. One such was Ronald Reagan, who is said to have been a 32 Degree Mason as president. Further, it is said that he became a 33 Degree Mason during his presidency. His vice president, George H.W. Bush, was a member of Skull & Bones. Whether he was a Mason or not would not affect the proposition that he was a committed occultist, which appears to be common enough at high White House circles, including cabinet secretaries.

Now, both of these men were leading the American nation at the time that Mexico was imploding, due to debt, and its currency was literally a "basket case." It is my belief that these two men, as well as the president of Mexico at the time, put into implementation a process for uniting North America. The union of Mexico, the United States and Canada would be sufficient to create this "northern regional government." The smaller Central American countries would be "sucked in" by the "gravitational force" of the monster government to the north. Occult import might be ascribed to the union, based on the intertwined triangles.

Parenthetically, about this time huge American industries began to refer - not to their American operations - but to their North American operations. Chance?

However speculative this may seem to people not very conversant with the "ruling circles" in America, the fact remains that the vast part of the modern immigration into America from South of the Border began at this time. No matter how loudly the resident citizens objected to the illegal immigration, this same leadership never did anything to stop it. Further, on at least two occasions during subsequent presidencies, amnesty was issued by the White House to all the illegal residents. No reasonable inference can be drawn but that the "ruling circles" were creating a demographic "fait accompli," exhibiting utter disdain for the will of the people on this issue.

Further, a Senor Salvador Borrego E., in his PUZZLING NEIGHBORS, demonstrated not only the relentless interference by the United States in Mexican affairs, but also that Freemasonry was frequently the guiding hand. He also showed the native Mexican Masonic influence in high circles in its government. Additionally, he showed that the president of Mexico at one relatively modern point had likened the U.S. and Mexico to two eagles flying together, the Mexican eagle following the American eagle. Besides the symbolic importance of eagles to Masonry, it also indicated the objective state of affairs: the Mexican Scottish Rite Lodge of Freemasonry was obedient to the American Scottish Rite Lodge, just as Grand Lodges are usually obedient to the United Grand Lodge of England.

The contemplation of union could only be planned after the United States had become a statist government in which all important policies were issue by the central government and in which private property was merely tolerated as vestigial but perhaps still useful.

To insure that the North American Union occurred on a timely basis, the "ruling circles" felt obliged to transform the United States's demography from overwhelmingly white European-derived to one which was composed of roughly equal minorities. The latter condition opened to the planners the option of instigating division, whereby one minority could be played off another. Increasingly, these planners saw the possibility of creating such chaos that the people would do anything for order. Then they would gladly step in and enact the long-planned steps, leading to a united world government by design.

It can be said with certainty that many of the leaders of both Mexico and the United States are secretly united in concept, although they may not seem to be. Here I speak also of academics, writers, polemicists, and "grass-root" leaders.

If one goes back to Chronicles and Kings in the Bible, one can see the policy of "moving people around." The House of Israel was moved out, and others were moved into the vacated space. It was done by design. However, one doesn't have to go back too far to see other examples of designed population movements. Consider:

"Soon after setting up the Communist International, Lenin, Stalin, Molotov, et al, realized that a vital requirement for world political warfare operations was to facilitate the emigration processes which would allow the movement and deployment of Communist political armies from one nation to another with a minimum of legal immigration delays. Coupled with the plan to establish freedom of emigration was a campaign to give unhampered rights for those foreigners already established to carry on subversive activities. In other words, complete freedom of emigration which in Bolshevik language was for the 'unhampered shifting of political armies' plus a campaign against deportation which would permit the Red agents to operate without danger of being removed from their sector of operation. This double-edged program became sloganized as the 'fight for political asylum' and 'the fight against deportation for political activity.' In other words, the problem was to move Red political soldiers freely into all sectors and to prevent those subversive aliens already intrenched from being thrown out of the country." [Col Archibald Roosevelt, CONQUEST VIA IMMIGRATION, pp.3,5]

Those who have witnessed the defense of the massive illegal entry into America could not fail to recall the Roman Catholic and Protestant clergy who went to the border to assist the illegal entry. Both religious groups have been significantly infiltrated by a potpouri of vile groups, such as Freemasons, Communists, and Neo-Uranians, who idealize the role of "agents of change." In the political parties there are now "spin-doctors" who are experts at avoiding strong points of argument by changing the terms, so that something else becomes the subject of debate. Material omission is virtually the rule of both politicians and press. Add to this mix the educational establishment, which has the task of producing "wasteland minds," and one sees not only a planned massive demographical change but a population massaged into thinking its normal. Most Americans think the desire to come to America is rather flattering to them. Neither the foolish nor the vain are likely to hold onto their inheritance. Consider:

"It is not just Mexican students in the American universities who are cooking up these kinds of ideas. Often they are led by Mexican faculty. Through the 'Chicano studies' programs on many campuses resentment against whites is taught causing these inevitable political consequences.

"For example, Charles Truxillo, who teaches Chicano Studies at the University of New Mexico, advocates a sovereign country called the 'Republica del Norte,' or Republic of the North, which would encompass the American Southwest.

"Truxillo said that the 'Southwestern Chicano and Norteno Mexicanos are becoming one people again.' This should be achieved 'by any means necessary,' using an overused, but no less menacing, quote by the late anti-white activist, Malcolm X.

"According to the Associated Press, Truxillo feels it is his job to develop a 'cadre of intellectuals' who will turn this concept into reality." [THE SPOTLIGHT, December 25, 2000, p.5, article by Eric Owens.]

Unfortunately, men such as Truxillo and Herbert Marcuse tend to collect devoted collections of misfits. Without such professors these misbegotten men and women might have settled for spray-painting "pig" on the walls of a luckless buildimg. Each of these "educated" people, like the living dead, seem able to bite a normal person and turn him into another living dead. Be that as it may, consider this:

"There is a movement growing in California and elsewhere in the nation of which - with help from the media - most Americans are entirely unaware but enjoys the support of both the California and federal governments.

"This phenomenon has come to be known as the Reconquista Movement (Spanish for 're-conquest'). It is highly organized and its main principal revolves around the recapture of the American Southwest by Mexican immigrants, both legal and illegal, and the overturning of the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo, signed by the United States and Mexico.

"As strange as this might sound to the average American, there is a growing popularity for this movement among the Mexican population, as demonstrated by the high-profile, and well-funded, Mexican activist groups involved....

"Consider this statement, if you will: 'California is going to be a Hispanic state, and anyone who doesn't like it should leave!'

"Now, this statement, ...is rather surprising when one considers that it was a public statement given by a Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient awarded by Bill Clinton in 1998.

"When asked if he had made the statement..., Mario Obledo followed up with: 'I did,' offering no explanation or apology.

"He then added, 'If they don't like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe....'

"Obledo said, '...it is the reality. We are going to take over all of the political institutions in California in the next five years.'" [THE SPOTLIGHT, Dec. 25, 2000, p.1, 4-5]

Well, it is safe to say that from Texas to California, a Hispanic majority will exist. Indeed, in the Gulf states generally there is that potential, led, of course, by Florida. This is due to an American political leadership that is de jure anti-white, a leadership among white clergy and educators whose "best hope" is to Rapture soon or blend in. The top brass in the military is either them, or takes it orders from them, so they are certainly not going to be supportive toward white people. They will announce a color-blind stance. With Jews pouring into American leadership positions across the board, aided and abetted by Freemasons (both groups are immune to "disparate results"), the future of independent, inveterate white people should recapitulate that of the Romanovs. Consider:

"Mario Obledo is the founder of a 'Latino' organization called the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF)...

"MALDEF was founded in 1968 with funding from the Ford Foundation....

"The Ford Foundation has funded quite an array of various non-white - and often anti-white - activist groups, from MALDEF and the National Council of La Raza (NCLR) or National Council of the Race, to the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, to name a few....

"MALDEF, like most 'Latino' activist groups, recognizes no real distinction between Americans of Mexican descent, and Mexican citizens. Although there is a marked difference in history, language and customs between the two groups, MALDEF is concerned primarily with race....

"When the president of Mexico, Ernesto Zedillo, came to America in July 1997, he paid a visit to this group and spoke before them in Chicano.

"At this meeting, he boasted: 'I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are a very, very important part of it.'

"California Gov. Gary Davis agreed. In 1999 Davis...clearly stated his vision for the future of California: 'In the near future, people will look on California and Mexico as one magnificent region.'

"This magnificent region is beginning to look more like a war zone. There have been several stand-offs between Mexican soldiers and the U.S. Border Patrol, when Mexican soldiers have crossed our border, and even shot at Border Patrol agents." [THE SPOTLIGHT, Dember 25, 2000, p.4, article by Eric Owens.]

It should be noted that the "Chicano" movement is distinct from Latino. It is Mexican. The "Race" or "people" being referenced are the descendants of the Aztecs. It does not really include Puerto Ricans, Cubans, and other Spanish-speaking groups, although common purpose against Norte Americanos may be deemed "wise community" and welcomed.

When I was a boy, the United States was about 90% white. The only "people problem" seemed to be how to assimilate or equalize the African American population. I gave up on that idea long ago, as the design of the "ruling circles" became more apparent. After experiencing a racially charged score of years, I never thought that I'd see substantial numbers of Africans immigrating into America, as well as African-derived Caribbean people. I realized that assimilation wasn't the issue; survival of a white people, per se, in America was the issue. As white people are already a minority (there is no reason to count those majority whites for whom continuance as a people is not an important issue), they can count on a struggle ahead.

The coming chaos is as much planned as is the design they have stored away somewhere for a post-chaotic world. The "ruling circles" have by now constructed very comfortable underground facilities to await the opportune moment to arise and restore order. Only a few days back, I heard a female media type speaking about Charley Manson and his "racist Helter-Skelter" cult. I have previously expressed the opinion elsewhere that the basic outline for his armageddon scenario was already being bruited about in covens and lodges in the 1960s, if not before, as a glimpse of things to come.

I don't enjoy propagating such matters, but the prospect of being a "guinea pig" is not too comforting either. Can you say "Swine flu?"

SYNAGOGUE AND STATE

2009-08-08T19:27:00.000-07:00

Periodically, there are issued warnings in major media about the need to be vigilant about keeping barriers between the operations of the state and those of religions. Usually, these alerts are sounded by politicians or pundits. The more significant voices in a major media outlet presume to be peers with the president, senators, representatives, and justices. Hence, they are accorded the tribute of repetition by other, lesser pundits, as if these "Solons of the Press" were eminent figures.

Now, doubt not that these media outlets are vain. Why shouldn't they be? They regularly serve up material omissions while pushing a legislative act or court decision, and they still are referred by "educated" people as authority figures. Such people regularly cite such "great media voices" as The Washington Post as asserting this or affirming that.

The electing citizenry (nowadays includes anyone living or dead) in America are hopelessly foolish. They want to work within a system that has already excluded them from power and is relegating them to a status akin to serf. They have vague notions that a couple hundred years ago, some colonists rebelled against their exclusion from important decision-making in regard to the colonies by the King of England and his council and parliament.They cannot really connect to this. It has no relevance to them. In their ignorance and fecklessness these contemporary Americans believe they are "part of the action." This is true only in the sense that they will go down with the ship of state, screaming from the third-class section, where the Great American Serfs dwell.

The Democrat-Republican Central Committee has already passed American versions of the Marxist planks of the Communist Manifesto. They have overseen the extension of central authority over the "sovereign" states, even as they have "forked over" national sovereignty to the United Nations and a plethora of associated transnational organizations such as IMF, NAFTA, NATO, WTO, et al. The only reason that justified their deeds is the establishment of a "true world government."

Do any Americans ever stop to contemplate their role in such a government? If they have little, or no, role other than to vote for a Democrat version or Republican version of a Bilderberg-approved type of candidate, can they expect to participate in this electoral charade in a world government composed of a vast majority of people (admittedly serfs, also) who neither know or care about any principles of government thought wise by those men who fashioned our constitution with its Bill of Rights? Why have these men and women of Anglo-Saxon, Scott, Welsh and Celtic descent forfeited all that their fathers had accomplished for the promise of better times ahead, led by secretive, corrupt, and deranged men?

Thanks to "planned chaos," the country not only speaks a thousand tongues, but the public schools try to teach a hundred different tongues as "first choice" or "primary" language. Hyperbole? Perhaps, yet it is in the service of a clearer understanding of folly. Not only have the secret leadership worked on their "new tower of Babel," they have turned America into a giant cauldron for their witchery. A country favored by scores of millions of minds none of which think alike will be just so much "sound and fury" - a veritable animal farm. Where people do not think alike, there can be no meeting of the minds. Without a meeting of the minds upon principles which are just and which favor the general good, there can be no coherent government.

The latter state of affairs favors - even demands - secret government. When thus it is established, then "evil be thou my good" becomes a principle any pig can work with.

For many years these "low-dwelling slugs" (words of Joseph Alsop re John Dean) have fought to destroy Christianity from within and, more recently, from without. As the Israelitish Christian tradition of American Christianity waned and its power scattered, it was increasingly replaced by the quazi-Satanist movement of the Kenneth Copeland-Paul Crouch-Benny Hinn cult and Masonic bogus-Christianity.

Satanists love war because of the large numbers of deaths that attend it, which release proportionately great amounts of "energy" or "life force," which can be harnessed by the ocultic masters to "change the world." Not surprising, then, is that one can find many millions of such "Christians" demanding war against any state, or people, that the State of Israel (sic) fingers or that one ?(or more) of the Jewish world organizations fingers. The latter categories work to advance Israeli interests. The bogus "Christian" followers of the Satanists and/or of JohnHagee also work to advance the Israeli interests. Both the Israelis and the bogus "Christians" work to attenuate the influence of legitimate Christianity.

In the latter cause the outraged cry that Christianity is trying to intrude into the affairs of state will be heard, even though Christian influence is as noticeable as mane on a crocodile. The country has become incredibly corrupt. Presently, it is possible for a couple of men or a couple of women to marry and subsequently adopt children. Unable to bear children, perverted couples can create "dynasties" of perversion through the adoption and "turning" process. An adopted child may not have the natural inclination toward a "misdirected libido," but after years of "training" by his parents, will likely be a disturbed and possibly dangerous creature. Homosexual couples now look forward to having Kennedy-like dynasties. They speak of devoting themselves to public "service."

None of this would be possible except in a state where Israelitish Christian thought had neither weight nor many adherents.

Further, many "Christian" groups imagine themselves hovering soon in the air with the returning King and His heavenly host. They imagine themselves looking down on the death, mayhem, and corruption with casual disdain. It is a shockingly patronizing and vain vision.

All these things are reenforced by a withdrawal from "dirty politics."

To cry forth "alarms" about the dangers to the doctrine of the separation of church and state caused by any present branch of Christianity- or all - is to establish a straw man to frighten "bird-brains." This is the work of the major media. It is profoundly incorrect.

Yet, there is a virtual union of a religio-culture and state in contemporary America. I speak of the union of synagogue and state. By adroitly replacing the constitution with the Traditions of the Talmudist, Jewry has cleverly merged its law and the state of America. Such things need not be blatant. However, the sheer denseness of America's former leadership made it possible for Jewry to "flount" their ascendancy.

Justice Ginzburg is said to read from the Talmud daily. She is an apparently avid student of rabbinic thought. This isn't surprising, as the Talmud is the ONLY law for Jews. Here I am not referencing Moses; the important elements in Jewish thought come from "schools" led by revered figures, such as Rabbi Akiva.

The "Bible" is not studied very much, relative to these revered rabbis. Jews probably studied what Bible lessons that they did study to better position themselves on those occasions when they had to converse with Christian scholars on some element or other of the Bible. The rabbis knew that their "law" and rituals weren't Israelitish; they also knew that they could bluff the Christians, who assumed that these two "religions" were operating in the same universe.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn) is another important Jewish political figure who is said to be a great student of the Talmud. Capitol Hill has a substantial number of elected Jewish legislators. Rarely mentioned is the fact that the committees and sub-committees on both senate and house side have large numbers of Jews, who typically function as data-gatherers and researchers. Such positions and functions provide Jewry additional tools to affect legislation. This discussion on personnel could go further. However, this is a blog - not a tome.

Perhaps the most salient issue that arises is that there is no discussion of "disparate results" when the issue touches upon Jews. Inequality ceases to be an issue. All those well-paying jobs, one might suppose, would be divided according to categorical weight, based not on wealth but on numbers of people. No way, Jose!

What is the issue here? Senators and representatives want the "best minds in the country" to ponder important issues, leaving these pols freedom to chase after young pages and take junkets to exotic places. Jews are not shrinking violets on these matters. They saw the opportunity and took it. Jews flooded into graduate schools to become PhDs. Voila! Jewish "experts" fell upon Capitol Hill, providing timely manna for the intellectually-starved pols.

A key "religious" concept in Jewry is Tikkum olam ("repair of the world"). As Jews began to perceive that they themselves, collectively, were the "promised messiah," they naturally felt obliged to "make it happen." Harnessing their masonic dog teams, they began the long trek of circling the globe repeatedly, and, in the process, they created global smarming and schmoozing, while schlepping their strategems into the "raised consciousnesses" of all other peoples (or their "elite").

All this is to say that Jewish singularities of thought and ideological requirements related thereto assured that in America there could be no separation of synagogue and state.

So what is their "game plan?" Jews do have a messianic impel. It is ultimately a united world that is guided by their wise stratagems. They would still have, and live by, their law, according to however it is interpreted at any given point. Others would live under the Noahide laws. Idolatry, such as Christianity, would be extinguished. This Jewish messianic order would produce a kinder, gentler world. They wouldn't lie - would they?

Oh, yes! There was blood along the way. However, it was spilled for the greater good, doncha know?

OPPORTUNISTS LATCH ONTO MUSEUM SHOOTER

2009-06-12T20:04:00.000-07:00

The recent shooting at the Holocaust Museum was both surprising and not surprising. How could such a contradiction exist? The general period of "terror events" has increased sharply enough that the American public is quite aware of them. They occur all over the globe. Our own government warns us fairly often, using a simple color-coded system, that a terror event may well happen here. F.B.I. "informants" [a word sanctioned by J. Edgar Hoover so that words such as "fink" or "snitch" would not have to be used] warn their controls of something suspicious, the color code warning is changed, and the media goes to work "agitating" Americans that they may be in danger. Guests appear on various media outlets to discuss likely spots that might be targeted by terrorists.

Almost always, the media paints a spectrum of villains that include Muslim "fanatics," Far-Right "Christrian" extremists, Neo-Nazis, Ku Klux Klansmen, and the like. If the "villains" are in the service, they most likely will be described as one of the previous groups serving in the military, while clandestinely plotting to blow-up something or other. "Racism" and "Anti-Semitism" are often described as characteristics of some of the above mentioned "terrorism-prone" groups.

In regard to the above groups, which are rarely mentioned without the obligatory "hate-group" designation, "experts" from the Anti-Defamation League of B'Nai B'rith ("ADL") and the Southern Poverty Law Center are called upon. As they are defined as "experts," the general public is conditioned to pay particular heed. Both of these groups also have fairly easy access to important figures in the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives. None of the groups they monitor do. Indeed, most members of such groups would probably quietly be arrested upon stepping onto Capitol Hill. How would anyone know? As mentioned, the two organizational experts spy upon Americans who they believe constitute a threat to the "Jewish World Agenda" (expression of Mr. Corzine of New Jersey) and have easy access to Congress to express their intelligence findings. I heard such a one from the Southern Poverty Law Center on WTOP radio today, June 12, 2009. Predictably and typically, he was "billied" as an expert.

Furthermore, in The Washington Times, Thursday, June 11, 2009, Front page, Article by Gary Emerling and Kristi Jourdan, one finds that "James W. von Brunn...was well-known by experts who monitor hate groups." The sort of experts these "newshounds" reference are those employed by the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The latter organization was founded by Morris Seligman Dees. He had operated a mail-order business for some years. He was able to find a buyer from the Great Lakes area, as I recall, and was able to schlep away with about $3 million. This fortunate sale provided the funding for his Southern Poverty Law Center. This operation was largely a Jewish-African American concern, legally targeting white people and white organizations. As marketing success brought in a "gusher" of contributions - mostly from Jews, the Southern Poverty Law Center could fund spying on Americans all over the country. Nor are these the only Jewish operated spy operations in America.

The concept of private organizations, mostly Jewish, spying on Americans would seem to engender an outcry. It doesn't. Those who do are immediately labelled "Anti-Semite," "racist," "extremists" or "possibly" a terrorist. American politicians and Fedcops schmooze with ADL and Southern Poverty Law Center experts to learn who the "bad guys" are.

However, the "bad guys" don't always seem so bad, when accurately described. As an example, although the "experts" through their energetic "monitoring" were well aware of James W. von Brunn, his move recently to the Chesapeake Bay area of Maryland was apparently quiet. According to The Washington Times article, his "neighbors appeared to know little about his anti-Semitic views or a Web posting on another site in November purportedly by him that warned of enemies in 'Congress, at 'Holocaust' memorials, [and] at synagogues.'"

In the deluded world of Jewish fantasists men such as von Brunn should be walking about in Nazi uniforms screaming "Sieg Hail!" The fact that he was little noticed may be due to the fact that wasn't an extremists at all. It was possible that he was correct in many of his views. In matters of this kind people all too often take the view which they are told to accept in school and the like.

I certainly can attest that in former times when I thought to educate, I found myself looking at an irate individual informing me that what I had said "Wasn't the way he had learned it." Lots of folks can't grow. At the age of seven their heads solidify into a rock impervious to any further education. To talk about the need to "think outside the box" with such people is to express a profound misunderstanding of their potential.

From the above cited media article the reader can learn about his "purported" connection to some Web posting. These "newshounds" don't seem to have made the investigative effort themselves to learn one way or another. They probably learned from "experts," and felt no need to personally investigate the matter.

I believe that it is self-evident that the Messiah, Jahshua of Nazareth, when he drove the moneychangers from the Temple, acted with justified wrath. Yet, this belief is not generally held today. One would be hard-pressed to find a Protestant minister who would approve such actions. Certainly, they have no intention of following his example.

Righteousness is offended by iniquity. There is, unfortunately, little righteousness today. Further, there is the corollary that evil is offended by righteousness. Congress may outlaw it (righteousness).

What are the offending views of Mr. von Brunn? What did he base his views upon. What are the facts? Don't expect the media to dwell on issues but, rather, to release sensationalized "tidbits." Their sources? The above alluded to "experts."

The charge of James W. von Brunn at and into the Holocaust Museum, as with "Picket's Charge," the "Charge of the Light Brigade," and similar desperate actions, was doomed from the outset to be just another isolated incidence of violence. As a propaganda gesture, it was doomed as well, as too few care about the reason for anything. Mr. von Brunn's enemies will define his actions for the history footnote which will prove applicable.

It is interesting to note that Mr. von Brunn's name appears to be Prussian. That reminds me of the World War II episode recently made into a "based upon" movie entitled Valkyrie. That plot against the life of Adolph Hitler was largely - in so much as it was German - led by Prussian officers. In Hollywood's version the conspirators are rendered as heroes. They were the true patriots. In reality the character Tom Cruise played in real life admitted that what they (the conspirators) planned was treason. Viewers of this film are asked (and expected) to be sympathetic toward the plotters as "noble" and the like. The violence, you see, is justified, according to the filmmakers. Killing Hitler and what he stood for was a "good thing."

The plotters against Herr Hitler were warriors for the most part. James W. von Brunn was a warrior, if radio news reports can be credited. The idea of a WW II decorated hero attacking the Holocaust Museum was bad PR for those trying hard to present him as an "extremist nut." Hence, his WW II record may be found and, if necessary, altered.

Why do I say this?

In the Front page article alluded to earlier above, one finds the following: "James W. von Brunn purported to serve aboard a Navy PT boat in a war that liberated Jews from the Nazi concentration camps. A half-century later, the victims of that war had unmistakably become the object of his unrelenting hatred." Besides being a non sequitur, one notices the slant that automatically puts Mr. von Brunn on the scoundrel-side of the equation.

Although these remarkably poorly-educated reporters suppose that America's venture into WW II was to rescue incarcerated Jews, there were not enough Congressional votes to get America into a war with Germany that a majority of the general population didn't want. It was only due to an attack on an American facility on Hawaii by the Japanese AND the mutual-defense treaty between Germany and Japan, that war was declared all around. We were then "in it." Not brought out by either of these fine Times reporters was the fact that neither Winston Churchill nor Dwight David Eisenhower mentioned the "death camps" or genocide in their lengthy descriptions of their parts in WW II. They certainly would have, if they were thought factual, rather than a Jewish fiction.

One might also point out that the victims of that war were the German and Russian people, primarily. The Jews came out of WW II in better condition, more powerful, and wealthier than ever before. Jews have made more money from WW II movies than exists in most countries in the world today.

Furthermore, if Mr. von Brunn "captained" or "served on" a PT Boat, the odds are very good that he served in the Pacific arena. If so, he undoubtedly fought against the Japanese Imperial forces - not Germany. It seems likely that these Times reporters are not aware that two separate wars were going on, one against the Japanese and one against Germany. Since one should also count Italy separately, one should note our war against three nations at that time. None were fought overtly for purposes of rescuing Jews from anything. Incidentally, the Times reporters should be aware that Zionist Jewry declared war on Germany in 1933. When the Germans had unconditionally surrendered, the Jews took revenge, including "death squads."

Parenthetically, under Eisenhower's malevolent supervision, approximately one million German prisoners of war basically starved to death, died of related diseases, or were shot by drunken French troops. See James Bacque's OTHER LOSSES.

The murder of six million Jews in various "Death Camps" - especially Auschwitz -is a demonstrable deceit. The crimes committed against the Germans after their surrender have rarely, if ever, been equaled. The Russians under the Lenin/Stalin regimes may have suffered more deaths, as did perhaps the Chinese under Mao Tsetung. However, it is unlikely that any other people have suffered the monetary theft under Allied coersion, as have the Germans. Money is still coerced today as ongoing reparations. More importantly, the psychological harm done to the German people by three generations of guilt-mongering at the direction of the Allies and their puppets in Germany will require decades of counter-methods to restore wholesomeness to an exceptional people who have been exceptionably wronged.

Mr. James W. von Brunn is presented as a 'hater" and "madman." Not knowing the fellow, it is hard for me to say. But I do know his enemies, and that is what makes me suspicious.

PROOF POSITIVE

2009-04-15T22:03:00.000-07:00

I can't help noting that the more things change, the more they stay the same. In nothing I know anything about is this truer than in this: Some idiot will publish a denial of the Holocaust.

For years I've scratched my head and wondered why Cal Poly or the University of California at Berkeley don't just devote a few experts to prove that technical challenges involving physical sciences to the accepted Holocaust history, in fact, are baseless. They could then demonstrate in detail how the physics, engineering, chemistry, et al, could result in the ghastly genocide.

Since the educators cannot or will not expend the time and money to resolve all doubts - once and for all, I wish to suggest an approach that might practically demonstrate the horrible facts of the matter.

Since the Nazis seemed to be fanatics in regard to cleanliness and as large numbers of Jews were apparently turned into bars of soap, I propose a solemn parade through Washington, D.C., of the living descendants of the victims of the Nazi Death Camps, in each hand of which would be a laminated bar of soap, representing one of the victims. A discreet banner, bearing the name of each victim, would be held by the free hand of the solemn participants.

If this parade were to be internationally televised, the impact upon the world's understanding of the tragedy of the murder of the Jews would be greatly improved. Science and engineering may have something useful to say on these issues, but nothing says it better than six million bars of soap. With these bars of soap, we can wash away the filth of doubt - once and forever.

Guest Commentary: FIXING THE ECONOMY

2009-03-30T21:39:00.000-07:00

Today, there is much ballyhoo about various politicians and their economists "fixing" the economic collapse. To fix the economy, they proposed doing what was done in the past under similar situation. Why not? This is what they do best. It is what they study at Harvard University and Yale University, et al. As a matter of fact, it is their own economic gameplan that has both created "booms" and suffered "busts." They suffer them gladly, as they don't suffer, typically, at all. Suffering is for the "little guy" (mensch).
Since one can rely upon Mr. Obama, who is no expert on money, economics or finance, to demand results, one can also expect a parade of big reputation types from colleges, universities, think tanks, Wall Street, Big Banks, and international corporations to advise him. The fact that Mr. Obama (no matter how quick he is) is dependent upon them, assures that he will try it their way. They are practiced liars, as actors and intelligence operatives usually are, and will rather convincingly lay down a "New Obama Economic Order," which they will easily sell to him and to Congress. As is always true with this group, the plan will combine "bank lending" (money creation via fractional banking), loans from the American people of the future to the American people now, loans from future Americans to American businesses now, and loans from our "friends" and "trading partners" to good pal, the U.S.A. (there may be some "jawboning" with nukes to get every friend and trading partner aboard).
After much pain and suffering for the little guy, the economy will slowly pick up for another run at a boom. However, the incredible levels of debt piled on by the last three Mexican Revolutionary Presidential leaders (the Arbustos and the Clintonistas) can only be managed by making the value of the U.S. "dollar" much less. Americans will puzzle that, though things are improving, they seem to still have a hard time paying their bills. The middle class shrinks, even as The Washington Post declares that things have never been so good for Americans.
The acting Kennedy family leader on Capitol Hill will demand that the minimum wage be raised, which will meet with cheers and salutes to his or her humanity. The fact that the level to which they wish it raised is only a modest fraction of what is required to live a day decently in America will not be commented upon.
Well, then, what should a truly sharp President Obama do? He should jetison his economic team over the Gaza Strip, and then return to the White House. He should order two copies of Col. Taylor's advice to Abraham Lincoln on the funding of his war to suppress the "Southern Revolt." He and his wife should tuck the girls in bed, turn out their lights, and go to a comfortable reading room in the White House. He and his wife should study the issue, discuss the matter, talk to a few trusted friends, and then TRULY save the American economy. If the Library of Congress tells the President that it cannot find any such data, Mr. Obama should then google the blog on this subject posted by Downnlaced.
I recently read an interesting Post on Blogline by JetINight on the way to get money into the economy. I recommend it.
Basically, JetINight proposed that the Department of the Treasury have the Bureau of the Mint print interest-free, legal tender, which would be 'greenback" dollars totally separate from the private banking system, known as the Federal Reserve. This is the successful proposal of Col. Taylor, in essence.
As long as it is legal U.S.A. tender for paying all debt and taxes, it will certainly be accepted. Any bank or international corporation that refused the money should be made liable, and the injured citizens allowed to sue that institution for ten times face value, utilizing the legal offices of the Department of Justice, as such refusal to accept U.S. legal tender would be an insult to the nation.
While JetINight did not offer a reasonable figure, I suggest that during the first year of the Obama Administration, it issue two trillion dollars in greenbacks, while ordering the Treasury Department to retire two trillion Federal Reserve Note "dollars." The next year, the Obama Administration would do the same. He should place anti-counterfeiting as a top priority, which should carry a mandatory death sentence. The next year, Mr. Obama should do the same thing. If he kept it up, then his administration would virtually eliminate debt in the Federal Government. He himself would go down in history as our greatest president. The nation would experience a boom unsurpassed and unequalled. In fact, this could be done while still financing the Levantine martial adventures. The only requirement is that he not be timid in regard tio the absolute level of legal tender printed. One trillion should be the minimum annual level. To do otherwise would be insufficient.
Since the financiers are thinly veiled revolutionary banditos, Mr. Obama will have to surround himself with trustworthy people. Abraham Lincoln tried to live a normal existence and that cost him his life.
According to JetINight, the new legal tender should be injected into the economy through the Small Business Administration directly as free grants to small businesses. The money should be parceled out rather evenly. Larger small businesses should not be markedly favored, effectively starving the smallest enterprises. Small businesses hire the great bulk of Americans. Both the small businesses and their employees would bank their checks normally. This would work to strengthen the banking system. The checks with actually represent on-hand greenbacks at a one-to-one basis. When these new Treasury checks are presented to the Treasury for payment, real currency would be sent to the banks. Eventually, this system would evolve into a cashless debit card system.
It should be realised that putting money into the people hands in a quick and responsible way is the object, also. The funding grants for small businesses answers this need.
Soon, perhaps during Mr. Obama's two terms, the Federal Reserve Act would be repealed, and the Jewish system of debt-mongering ended in America forever.

All rights reserved. Nomoonnight, 2009

OBAMA SOLVES -- NOTHING!

2008-12-04T15:47:00.000-08:00

The Obama Administration has taken sufficient shape to say authoritatively that its going to boil down to more of the same. He has appointed some individuals possessed of mighty high opinions of themselves. Hence, the most interesting thing about the Obama presidency may be the personality clashes as the "same old-same old" gives birth to a gridlock of unsolvable problems. [It's not that findamental problems can't be solved, or at least lessened; the effort is doomed here by the certain application of variations of fixed ideas which are founded on occult speculation and which have never worked well--and never will.] These people are going to toward their beloved New World Order, but will become bogged down within a year and a half, Look then for the feuding and fussing to rear like a Hydra.

What the nation really needs is a Beowulf to take out a sword and inflict some mighty wounds on the complete monster of "New-World-Orderers" Then, maybe the problems of the nation can be addressed.

If Mr. Obama is to be believed, his thrust in the area of Levantine diplomacy will be to expand the war in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is absolutely the worst place on earth, other than the north and South Poles, for any outside military expedition to take place. With the possible exception of Genghis Khan and his horde, no outsider has ever been able to conquer and subdue these people and the terrain they call home. This will require the redeployment of U.S. military from Iraq to Afghanistan. That will allow a not-so-clandestine takeover by Shiite partisans, their struggle to produce the necessary strongman, and a bogus "republic" (usually incorrectly described as a "democracy") whose "president" is for life. The U.S. will end up borrowing money from the Chinese to support their Iraqi "democratic leader."

Since the "military - industrial complex" has been partners with the leaders of the Democrat - Republican Socialist International in perfecting the martial art of bankrupting its host country, the only country we are likely to have defeated after the conclusion of the Iraqi-Afghanistani conflicts is --- The United States of America. Personally, I hate to see Uncle Sam standing at a street corner holding a sign saying, "Will work for food," but, then again, folks say I'm just a clown.

As far as the economy is concerned, there is no solving of the periodic major economic dislocations, so long as the Jewish System is maintained. the nation's "wise men" could learn a little about good government if they considered Abraham Lincoln's "greenback" initiative. [see downnlaced's blog on subject at WordPress.com] As a matter of speculation, Lincoln's program is a major potential reason for his assassination. The "Moderns" however wish to pursue the Jewish System, aka, the Babylonian Woe. In this system usury is king - not cash. In this system there is never enough cash to cover the outstanding debt. Even a Harvard University PhD. out to be able to figure out the potential for disaster.

Human greed is a noteworthy source of trouble. When those suffering from this personalty defect are also leaders in the banking/financial community, then the condition is ripe for recessions and depressions. The Federal Reserve Act, which is U.S. legislation that will live in infamy, was enacted, it set up a system whereby U.S. currency enters the political economy through private banks (creating a money trust), rather than paid into the economy by enactment of needful laws funded through the Department of the Treasury and utilizing, or based upon, legal tender.

The beneficiaries of the Jewish System have hired an army of economist and lawyers to opine that the Jewish System is not flawless, but it is the best system that mankind has ever devised. All concepts inimical to the Jewish System of debt-mongering is dismissed as "simplistic." The major media invite the hireling economists and lawyer/politicians to "face the nation and explain the matter." See above for their opinion.

These people are likely to pull Uncle Sam out of the pit one last time before they introduce a recovery which will end the U.S government, as was understood by the old constitution. This doesn't represent an Obama triumph of change. It represents the utter Third-Worldization of America. The population of the U.S. may be 600 million by Obama's last year, if he gets two terms. Those bodies may be needed to shoulder the debt load, as well as to reliquify the U.S. monetary system through the issuance of credit to them to spend the needed money into the economy, which can then be greatly expanded by the "miracle" of fractional banking. Here comes the next "boom."

IRAN MON AMOUR?

2008-07-10T14:35:00.000-07:00

Today, I was "clowning around" while listening to the "traffic" radio station for a little forecast of what lay ahead, when I cranked up my act and rolled out of my #1 tent. Now, it so happens that they provide "breaking news and analysis" as well. My timing was such that I "got in" at the beginning of an international intelligence analysis of the Iranians firing off a missile in a test.

This station's lead reporter ( named "J.J.") was giving a typically slanted report, utilizing insider information gleaned undoubtedly from three sources: the Israelis, the Arbusto (Spanish for "bush") Likudites, and that modern new and most dangerous hybrid, the "military-industrial-think tank-academic complex." The latter are comprised of "straw men" searching for a brain, and the Israelis are playing the "Wizard of Oz" to give them needed reassurances.

There is an immense "beating of the war-drums" in regard to Iran, orchestrated by the Israelis-World Jewry interests. Iran is relentlessly pictured as an "aggressor nation," as a "terrorist threat," as the "premier destabilizing element in Iraq," as a "threat to our troops," and, most important of all, a "threat to the very existence of Israel." Get real!

Israel is about the fourth most powerful nation in the world, considered strictly by itself. When you throw in its colony of U.S. Federal America, which controls the U.S.A., then you have the far and away most powerful force on earth. Add in the controlled or heavily- influenced Great Britain and its Commonwealth, the power gets even greater. The ruling circles of France are completely intertwined with Jewry, and France is competitive with the U.S. in "electing" Jewish leaders, partially Jewish leaders, and men whose hands have long been under the dominant Jewish "loincloth."

Germany is still an occupied country. Reparations to the Israeli state and Jews individually (paid in German money) have allowed "successful" reinvestment in the most pivotable business groups: media, entertainment, finance/real estate among others. This does bring influence, which can be brought to bear on German politicians, so much so, that only a few years back, The Washington Post broke away from "drum-beating" for unlawful entry by the "world community" into America (typically on "humane" grounds) to joyfully salute the 100,000 ,or so, Jews who have moved back into Germany, opening synagogues and making themselves "comfy."

The Russian Republic under Vladimir Putin did try to improve its relationship with Muslim nations in the Levant, which has been loudly bruited about (so there can hardly be a secret) that Russia might be a threat to the Israeli state, too. If not directly, then certainly indirectly. What is not stated is that about 25% of the population of the Israeli state is comprised of Jews from Russia, who are still Russian-speaking, culturally-influenced, have relatives living in Russia, and who are the primary forces behind the Marxist aspects of the Israeli state, including its atheism. The whole Zionist movement was composed of people who were as comfortable with Marxism as with Judaism. The former arose from concepts in the latter. In short, Vladimir Putin and the Israelis have had comfortable dialog from almost the "getgo," and these two nations eagerly seek trade relationships between one another. The Israelis have long had a very close working relationship with the Peoples Republic of China, regularly selling to the Chinese classified U.S. industrial and hightech information and hardware. Recently, the Israelis have developed a close relationship with the Indians. Both the rapid industrial-hightech development in India and China and the rise of the price of oil per barrel are unthinkable without American, European and Israeli Jews working to make it happen.

Given this sort of diplomatic power, why would anyone think that the relatively small and surrounded nation of Iran would, apparently for religio-ideological reasons--and welcoming its suicidal consequence, launch a nuclear genocide against the Israeli state? If you listen to Washington, D.C., news reports (or read them), you would suppose that it is a high probability event. Because this sort of assertion is "nuts," the Washington "newshounds, pundits, and eggheads" must assert that it is precisely because the Iranian leaders are "insane," that this threat is credible. Folks, they are the crazy ones. And possibly downright evil in the bargain. I'm not "clowning!"

The Israeli state possesses something in excess of 200 hundred nuclear devices. They may have twice that many. They have them in all sizes, as the Jews are very good at "tweaking" weapons, once they get their paws on them. This nation undoubtedly has an array of defensive missiles also. In so much as the U.S. produces such missiles, it is an "odds on bet" that the Israelis have gotten them, although it may have been given to them sub rosa. They may have obtained them from other countries as well. By now, they are in a strong position. Still, they do want to extend their property lines into Eretz Israel--the massive chunk of the Levant that allegedly was controlled by King David. Usefully, this turf contains quite a lot of oil. It is also a key strategic location between East and West.

Both the U.S. and the Israeli state have repeatedly bombed and invaded other countries. The U.S. has the world's most dubious record of having dropped atom bombs on two Japanese cities--Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The U.S. sees its "interests" all over the world, sees "madmen" everywhere, and attacks them everywhere. This allows its "control" to be a bit more discreet, attacking mostly neighbors, including Africans, which have had numerous destabling "events" over the last forty years. Of course, the Israelis aren't the only ones playing the African game of "Who's the strong man?" Both the U.S. and Israelis have a long record of fomenting a problem and then denouncing the surprised adversary. Clean hands? Get real!

When I was much younger, the U.S. began to "seep" vital military information to the U.S.S.R. The Soviets began to explode nuclear weapons. Alien intellectuals such as Henry Kissinger and ZBigBrother began to preach that the only safe course to take under these dangerous circumstances was "Mutually Assured Destruction." The U.S. and the Soviet Union should seek "parity" in nuclear weapons, so as to make an attack by either "suicidal." Peaceful coexistence could then follow. Hopefully, in time, the two nations would find their economic systems merging. Friendship would follow. This was the theoretical model bandied about.

Rather than seeing the U.S. and the Israelis bombing and invading other countries of the Levant on an never-ending basis (or until sufficient "puppets" can be installed and provided with secret police to enforce "democracy"), I'd like to see a certain "coolness" exhibited. Let Iran become the "designated opposition" (correlative of the U.S.S.R.), whose nuclear weapons force it and the Israelis into "peaceful coexistence."

There is one thing that I've learned in life: bullies like to bully folks much smaller and weaker than they. Equality of size usually causes bullies to "chill out." However, there is the possibility that the real problem is that the "forces of democracy" just can't tolerate diversity.

STEP RIGHT UP, FOLKS! GENUINE H2O ON SELL!

2008-06-14T18:59:00.000-07:00

It seems to me that as long as I can remember I've been drinking water for free. My Mom was pretty tight with the coins, and it would take a pretty good struggle to wring a coin from her paw. Now, don't get me wrong! My Mom wasn't a beast or anything. It's just that what she put away in the "cookie jar," she defended fiercely. You had to have a good reason to get any of it. Real good!.

Yet, my Mom never charged us kids any money for food, or for a place to sleep for the night, nor for water, whether utilized for bath or to drink. Mom understood that there were things that you just didn't have a right to charge for.

There was a time that this was a common belief. I speak here of the 1950s. Virtually everyone thought that water provision was a governmental function, and city waterworks were the norm. The idea that someone might try to create a scarcity of water so as to make a big profit entered no one's head.

Apparently, that's not the case anymore. How do I know? Well, sir, several years ago I read an article in the Wall Street Journal which described how "mergers and acquisitions" mogul, T. Boone Pickens of Texas, was investing in water rights in the great central aquafer that rests beneath the Plains States. I believe it has a fancy name, whether of palaeontology, geography, or marine science, I cannot recall. At any rate Mr. Pickens expected that water would be a commodity whose price was certain to rise. He planned on making a bundle of loot, as water scarcity and human demand compelled an upward trajectory for a "gallon of water."

Parenthetically, I'm not certain whether Mr. Pickens plans to sell water by the gallon, or, as with oil (of which he knows a lot), he plans to sell by the barrel.

I did receive in the mail an unsolicited stock "tout sheet" from a Mr. Jarret Wollstein, who seems to believe that "the biggest commodity boom in history is building steam as I write...That commodity is clean fresh water, and I can assure you, the smart money is getting in now..."

Now, Mr. Wollstein is a convincing, enthusiastic salesman. He cites logically that there are no new sources of fresh water. The world population is increasing, and as many of them as possible will try to come here. That means greater pressure on a limited resource. He also points out ecological considerations and water pollution with toxic chemicals. Science, he seems to feel, cannot rescue the situation in the limited time before the onset of the "Great Water Famine." He offers other reasons but lets stop here.

Who is "the smart money?" Well, of course, I've mentioned Mr. Pickens. One assumes he has some sharp associates in the project as well. Who else? According to Mr. Wollstein's tout sheet, the Queen of England warned in March about the "competition for fresh water by a growing population is itself becoming a source of potential conflict." Further, former Federal Reserve chairman, Allen Greenspan, according to this tout sheet, believes that a bad economic turndown is certain, but that the potential for water price increase makes it the new road to riches. Well, I paraphrase the sense of the quoted chairman.

If Greenspan were interested, its a good bet that the Rockefeller condominum of rich and savvy investors have already taken substantial stakes in water. As with the "art" purchased by the Rockefellers at a cheap price and later unloaded at stupendous profits and/or tax write-offs, so it may be with water. This would also explain the enthusiastic support of Latin peon migration into America by the Rockefeller crowd. This migration would generate a quantum leap in American water usage, starting the pressure upward for the water commodity. But Latins are not the only people pouring into America.

Now, if the Queen of England can perceive water shortages causing conflicts, do not suppose for a moment that the ruling circles in America don't understand that as well. So, why do they do all that they can to ease the travail of invading hordes of people? Why have they NEVER made any semi-serious effort to control our borders and regulate rationally (or at least according to the legislation of record) migration? Why have they always used rhetoric to stall any effective action? They wanted to create a fait accompli.

Since water shortages in America can only be hastened by unrestricted invasion whereby scores of millions of people clandestinely take their refuge in America, awaiting Jorge W. Arbusto's amnesty and "instant citizenship" proclamation. In gratitude they can only respond: "Hail, Caesar!"

Things at the highest levels of government operate with knowledge, purpose and vision. What is the vision of those who "pull the strings" of the Democrat-Republican Socialist Party? It is one of global order, created out of chaos. They are the ones who create the chaos. When the old structures lie in ruin, they will gather together like Nehemiah, Ezra, and the remnant of Israel to rebuild the world ("tikkun olam") They imagine this, as they have a zany understanding of the pertinent relationships.

It is difficult to know how to halt their madness. I recall seeing a roughly formed phalanx of "Weathermen" (or a similar Marxist group) walking down 15th street in Washington, D.C., about 1970 or '71, heading for The Mall area. Their phalanx was perhaps five across and twenty-five deep (as I now recall). Maybe more. I supposed them to be mostly Jewish. They got my attention, and I watched as they "marched," thrusting their fists into the air and chanting: "One more war! Revolution! One more war! Revolution!" I watched them turn the corner, marching toward Fourteenth Street, NW.

When I think back upon those Jewish lads, I believe that they offered an answer to America's looming problems. When leaders are deranged, corrupt, martial, dictatorial, and insatiably greedy, maybe it is time for a "Tea Party." If anyone can afford the water, that is!

AUTHORITIES SUSPECT SUICIDE

2008-06-01T18:45:00.000-07:00

Now, dodging bullets ain't no fun, but it beats getting hit. I believe that I'm on the same page with most people on this issue. It is with great reluctance (hey! I'm a clown!) that I bring up the subject of "politics and foul play" again. Still, with Hillary Clinton running for the Democrat nomination for President of the United States, and with her husband--so to speak--lurking in the shadows, one must expect bodies, some how or other, to start surfacing, "bobbing on the sea of political change." This couple has a track record which includes in its wake enough bodies to make a respectable professional football team. Well, I exaggerate a tad.

The recent news which has come to my attention of "nightriders" stiking the celebrated church of Barack Obama has caused much misgivings as to its source. I personally rule out the Ku Klux Klan. Yet, within the African-American community--even today--resides a residual fear of the Klan. Hence, for many African-Americans upon hearing that "death" stalked the congregation of Trinity United Church of Christ, an instant image of white-sheeted Klansmen, dragging an innocent member of the congregation to his doom entered their collective consciousness.

Part of a tragedy can be its generation of involuntary misgivings and suspicions. This is especially so when the tragedy involves a murder. Hence, three murders over a brief period of time has people looking over their collective shoulders. Any odd fellow immediately draws suspicious glances, as people are always certain that "evil" doesn't look like them.

Some readers may be scratching their heads and asking: What is he talking about? Let me give the basic data by means of a citation from a usually reliable source. Consider:

"The bombshell may involve the murder of Donald Young, a 47-year-old choir master at former Rev. Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ--the same congregation that Obama has attended for the past 20 years. Two other young black men that attended the same church--Larry Bland and Nate Spencer--were also murdered execution style with bullets to the backs of their heads--all within 40 days of each other, beginning in November 2007. All three were openly homosexual.

"What links this story to Barack Obama is that, according to an acquaintance of Obama, Larry Sinclair, Obama is a closet bisexual with whom he had sexual and drug-related encounters in November 1990. Further, Sinclair claims that Obama was friendly with at least two of these deceased parishioners, and that choir director Donald had contacted him shortly before being murdered from multiple gunshot wounds on December 23, 2007....

"An even more sinister aspect of this case is being investigated. According to Sinclair in an affidavit to the Chicago Police Department, Donald Young had informed him that he and Barack Obama were 'intimate' with each other....

"Another questionable Obama associate is openly homosexual. That person is Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig, who was listed during the 2008 campaign as being part of Obama's 'technology initiative.' " [AMERICAN FREE PRESS, June 2, 2008, p.13, Article by Victor Thorn, a well-known author]

The allegations against Barack Obama seem to depend heavily at this time on one man, Mr. Sinclair. The whole story calls to mind the fine political novel by Allen Drury entitled, ADVISE AND CONSENT, wherein a similar problem lurked. Is life imitating Art?

Regardless of the issue of sex--and Washington politicians are beyond blushing at any sexual act done by them or anyone else, the inconvenient fact of at least two homosexual members of Obama's congregation getting bullets to the back of the head must lead to undesirable questions, from the point of view of the Democrat's leading candidate for office.

For the American public--what with "surf's up!" and all--there may be minimal heed paid to the matter. It would tend to be "rolled up" in the issue: "Isn't that the strangest church? I'm so glad that Obama decided to leave it." No one will wonder if he took a smoking gun with him.

Did Obama's rather steely wife get rid of her husband's potential problems? Were these C.I.A. "hits" ordered by a) Billy Jeff Clinton or b) Daddy Bush? If Bush, the reason is obvious: help Sen. John McCain get elected, so he can continue "W's" war--maybe even let him carry the burden of "dropping the bomb" on Iran, so that history books can later make "W" into a lonely, courageous President standing tall against an implacable, evil foe, at a time when others were calling for "cut and run" policies. "W" --basically a man of peace--refused to use the bomb.

John McCain may be a "patsy." If he's wise, he won't select Jeb Bush to be his vice presidential running mate. "Patsies" die promptly, as if on cue.

EXPENDABLE POLITICIAN?

2008-03-11T09:59:00.000-07:00

There have been a number of "trial ballons" released by Democrat "movers & shakers" in regard to a Democrat "Dream Ticket." According to these political thinkers, a Presidential/Vice-Presidential ticket comprised of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., would be unbeatable. All the weaknesses of Hillary in the perceptions of voters are more than covered by Barack Obama.

These political thinkers believe that, if Obama were to head the ticket, rather than Hillary, then Obama's weaknesses in terms of experience would be successfully exploited by the McCain team. Whoever joins McCain is likely to be a "meat ax" pro. (He may choose a Black to off-set charges of racism.) Therefore, a ticket headed by Obama (with Hillary in the Vice Presidential slot) would be more vulnerable. Even the "Junior" at the end of Obama's name suggests that maybe Obama has not really "grown" enough to be President of the United States.

More ominously, according to political realists, is the fact that a Presidential ticket headed by Obama invites assassination. Given the heavy support among the Black population of America for Barack Obama, such an assassination would result in social strife.

According to this line of thought, Hillary Clinton might be willing to play "second fiddle" for a while for the sake of William Clinton's candidacy, but would she be willing to wait out Barack Obama?

The long string of suspicious deaths in the wake of the Clintons' political rise cannot be a source of comfort to Obama supporters. The fact that Gerald Ford was shot at, while Nelson Rockefeller was Vice President, and the fact that Ronald Reagan was shot at, while George H.W. Bush was Vice President, point to the inherent danger to the President and to the care that must be taken in choosing a Vice Presidential running-mate.

FISH? OR ABOMINATIONS?

2008-03-06T17:05:00.000-08:00

I had reason to glance at the Metropolitan section of The Washington Times today (03/06/08), as I planned a short break from toil. I headed for a small "library" nearby, where I hoped to get myself grounded in local doings. Immediately, I was struck by a color picture of various fish (sole on ice?), lined enticingly at a counter display at some seafood vendors or other.

The article which accompanied the photograph (by Joseph Silverman) was entitled: "SEAFOOD: HOW SAFE?" It was the project of one Karen Goldberg Goff, and was a consumer-oriented piece. The specific area of concern was mercury contamination of seafood. It began: "Information in the seafood world has become as muddy as the water during a thunderstorm..."

I thought that this was an inauspicious beginning, as it seemed to suggest that the writer was not going to be too plain herself, regarding the warning which presumably was to follow. However, I'm all in favor of public information being presented on issues affecting health. The article proceeded forward, touching on consumers, science, law and public policy. Hence, one does not feel "cheated," having spent a bit of time glancing through it.

The article does not offend me so much as a sort of statistical chart that adjoined it. This chart is fairly large (almost as large as the photograph, previously cited, under which it rested). The title of this chart was: "FISH FACTS." This seemed to me to be perfectly straight-forward and germane. In fact it even seemed to be a tad more specific than Ms. Goff's "seafood world."

Bitter was my disappointment! Under the title for the chart were three subtitles: "HIGH MERCURY," "MODERATE MERCURY," and "LOW MERCURY." Beneath the "MODERATE MERCURY" subtitle, one spies the caveat: "These fish contain moderate amounts of mercury:". Thereafter, one observes among the list of "fish" such specimens as: "Lobster" (crustacean) and "Mahi-mahi" (dolphin: mammal). Under the subtitle of "LOW MERCURY" one finds the caveat: "These types of fish contain the lowest amounts of mercury:". Beneath it are listed such "fish" specimen, as: "Clams," "Crawfish," Oyster," "Shrimp," and "Squid."

Really? Although few people today pay heed to ANYTHING Biblical, and, therefore, the fact that most of these singled out items are, in fact, dubbed "abominations" by Holy Scripture eludes the typical newspaper reader. Nevertheless, has zoology changed that much since I was a young student? Do modern teachers (or textbook writers) view inequality with such abhorence that they cannot teach any form of observable categorical distinction? Will some form of marine life be "offended" if excluded from the category of "fish?" Indeed! (Some modern "dictionaries" even list as secondary definitions of "fish" nearly anything one could "bring in" in a net (plastic bottles included).

Although, no doubt, the pedagogery has evolved from distinctions among observable life-forms to "almost sameness" in life-forms, this is not based on Charles Darwin's observations and theory of a natural selection at work, but rather a fine madness, which replaces materialism with abstractionism. This abstractionism is proclaimed "more essential" by these "con men" than the old observable criteria for establishing categories. One example of this that comes to mind, being the proclamation, ipse dixit, that we are all emanations from the "sea of being." In such a "sea" there cannot be any distinction between fish and crustacean, nor, indeed, fish and fowl. And so it goes with modern "schooling."

Folks, we've encountered this before. Hans Christian Anderson's tale of the "King Who Wore No Clothes" touches upon the ongoing duping of the world by these "tailors."

Well, if they win, and we are all eventually proclaimed to be fish, my only advice is: Stay low and keep your fins moving.

DODGING BULLETS: WHO'S IN DANGER?

2008-03-05T21:18:00.000-08:00

The election year 2008 is one that may be looked at from many points of view. There are many ways to build statistical curiosities in regard to the electoral process and in regard to individual candidates for President. I thought that it might be interesting, given the track record in the United States, to consider the candidates most likely to be shot at and possibly killed.

The odds on favorite, if he had any chance at all of getting the nomination, would be Mr. Ron Paul.

Huge amounts of money have been spent to "shape" America, so that it will fit comfortably into the Pan American Super State, or Region. Judges and Legislators have been bought. Preachers and pedagogs have been enlisted. Big Business has its eyes "whirling and leaping" at the thought of "economy of scale" achieved by the Pan American Union (proposed currency: the "Pani").

With the Rockefeller condominium fully behind the "PAU" there seemed to be no reason to suppose that this union would not occur reasonably soon. Sure, there may be a few "rogue" leaders--such as Chavez--to "rub out" first. But the Bilderberger-Panglossian dream seemed at hand.

Then came Ron. Ron Paul. He comes talking about the Constitution, talking about eliminating the IRS, talking about defending OUR borders , rather than other countries' borders half a globe away from us, and talking about limited government. He warns of debt and the flaws in our money-creation system. This guy is clearly a danger to megalomania in our time! All debtmongerers are implacable foes. What does Ron Paul know about The New World Order? What does he know about The Global Syndicate? What does he know about Tikkun Olam? NOTHING!

He doesn't understand the "big picture" (the masses of people are incapable of ruling themselves and, hence, must be ruled with an iron hand). It is the burden of the rich and brainy murderers to save the world from itself. The tribute the people will pay for this service is a modest infinity of servitude.

Therefore, all talk about limited government is treason. The wage of treason is death. Therefore the rich and brainy murderers have a perfect right to kill Ron Paul. It's the only responsible thing to do. He has already earned it.

It is predicted, here, that if Ron Paul were able to mount a campaign as successful and threatening as Gov. George Wallace's campaign was, he would be gunned down.

Now, another potential presidential contender who might be gunned down is Barack Obama. The problem with him is that he may actually have some ideals hidden within that no one noticed. If he seemed to be a threat to the State of Israel, due to an even-handed approach to all countries (forgeting that some countries are more equal than others), then the wheels of change (assassination) may be set in motion. What if he tried to cut funds to the wealthy Israeli State, so as to have more money available to assist the pitifully poor nations in Africa? Such actions would immediately gain him the title of "rogue head of state," and he might well be assassinated by the Secret Service itself.

Parenthetically, rumor has it that the Rockefeller family security apparatus is staffed by the cream of the Secret Service. Once a Secret Service agent has proven that he is skillful in protecting the President, then he is ready to move up to the "big time" position of protectiing the Rockefellers.

Now, certainly no one expects Obama to be much more than an "absentee President," enjoying trips and fun. The inside view is that Obama will be somewhat like former mayor of Washington, D.C., Mr. Anthony Williams. Therefore, it is expected that he'll probably attend a lot of Nats games and catch some Wizard b-ball, visit brother masons in lodges around the world, while leaving the boring day-to-day White House work to his Vice President and White House staff.

These latter will most likely be selected by a Rockefeller "think tank" for their solid credentials, experience, global respect, etc. They will be good, patriotic men who can be trusted to fulfill the Bilderberger vision of a world community, controlled by people who had "the right stuff" (vast sums of money, tolerance toward the Enlightened, and an understanding that the world had limited resources, which could not be wasted on "idiotic useless eaters").

Naturally, then, if Obama proved to be Lincolnesque, his fate would likely be the same.

Now, there is one other caveat for Obama's candidacy. The long list of untimely dead that bob in the aether of the Clinton duo's political wake. For the Clintons "problems" often "go away" forever.

MR. GROUCHY FOR PRESIDENT?

2008-02-20T19:59:00.000-08:00

The thought of Israel Firster John McCain as President of the United States of America just doesn't sit well with me. It seems that a nation ought to be able to find someone for president who's out for America first. Supporters of John McCain say he is a patriot and supports America, as do most veterans. If he does support America, he most likely does in the sense of the "PanAmerican Union," favored by the Rockefeller condominium of powerful people and organizations.

As a long time disciple of Zionism's Trotskyites-turned-neo-conservatives, which crowd manifest itself like some form of advanced skin-cancer, dotting the surface of the Arbusto presidency, there can be little doubt what foreign policies he'll follow: Kill Israeli enemies, John, kill Israeli enemies! Given his alleged mental instability and outbursts of rage, his controllers may keep him on doses of thorazine most of the time--just as a precaution.

Some critics have, in fact, suggested that John McCain is a Manchurian Candidate of some sort. Although most ordinary American citizens who have had military experience look upon Testy John as a sound, manly patriot, this view is typically founded on their own fantasies, rather than facts and credible evidence. Consider some of the counter evidence:

1.) Dennis Johnson, a graduate of Officer Candidate School, was brought into Hanoi with a broken leg that was never treated. He saw McCain only a few times but heard much about his clean clothes, being showered and clean shaven and always with a few NVA officers during his stint at the "Hilton."
"He received special treatment and was sent to the hospital days after he arrived because he agreed to cooperate, and yes, he did give radio broadcasts for the NVA, not only to North Vietnam but broadcast over the camp speakers," Johnson said. "None of the other prisoners wanted anything to do with him because of these issues. It makes me sick to hear him called a war hero. He was worse than Fonda, for she was just an idiot, but McCain was supposed to be one of us." [American Free Press, February 18, 2008, p.11, art. by Pat Shannan]

I submit to you that if he is elected president, the day will soon arrived when men and women throughout this land will say: He was supposed to be one of us." The fact that the media has welcomed his advance on the White House and treated him kindly reflects McCain's widely known support of the Israeli cause (fighting "rogue states"--mostly non-docile states occupying Eretz Israel). His election would speed up the transition of a sovereign U.S.A. into an Israeli Colony, run by a governing Supreme Colonial Council. What is de facto may well become de jure under two John McCain administrations.

Mr. Mitt Romney has gotten on board with Testy John. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em! He may well hope to be the Vice President to McCain's President Grouchy. (This opens up the possibility of President Grouchy being replaced by President Groucho.) For surely the possibility of the "mean old man" dying in office hasn't eluded Mitt Romney.

Mr. Romney is a Mormon. This is a religion that, among other things, believes that the Anglo-Saxon people are descended from the Northern Kingdom of Israel and are, therefore, primarily the seed of Ephraim and Manasseh. This is probably correct. But what is truly bizarre about the Mormons is that the think that Jews are descended from the Judahites. Jews are known to be a mixed multitude. The seedlines of Esau, Canaan, and Ismael had found their way into the Southern Kingdom before the advent of Yahshua. At the time of Yahshua's tribulations, the High Priest Caiphas, the king Herod, and most of their priests and courtiers were Edomite Jews. No wonder some of them told Yahshua that they were of the seed of Abraham but had never been slaves!

The point of all this is to say that Mitt Romney will bend to the will of the Jews, as he tries to please them. Radio station WTOP is owned by Mormons. They have installed a vast crew of Jews to address the issues of the day. Needless to say, material omissions are the order of the day--every day. As an example, Mr. Ron Paul is hardly ever mentioned as a candidate for president. Mr. Tancredi was dismissed as a "one-issue" (immigration) candidate. WTOP loves the Latino invasion. Hardly a day goes by without scary references to Iran. Most "experts" sought out by this station are Jews or "terrorist-mongers."

Parenthetically, no one has ever explained to me how "democracy" can exist with minority rule. At one time Jewish-led political forces, including media, inveighed against the "tyranny of the majority" (democracy). Now that a Jewish dominated minority-rule government is in place, criticism of this situation brings forth hoodlums to decry "anti-semitism." In about 100 years Jews managed to immigrate from Europe and Russia and install themselves as practically the dictatorship of the "workers" (the term now must include those who had a job, or at one time wanted a job, as well as those who hold jobs now).

Don't look for "Christian" preachers or Catholic priests to come forth to preach the merits of our original form of government. To them goodies come from blessing Jews.

Therefore, the favorite of the neo-con Jews is John McCain. Therefore the favorite of Zionist "Christians" is likely to be McCain. He may go all the way.

Hold on there, partner. The Clinton gang is still riding, and if Hillary get the nod over Barack Obama, then some of John McCain's "dark secrets" from his POW days may come to the surface. As the Clintons are perfectly acceptable to many Jews (they both have Jewish antecedents, it seems,-- certainly Hillary), a changing of horses may occur in mid-stream, as the saying goes. Consider:

2.) "The Clintons have been talking with a former Soviet translator who was present at interrogations at several North Vietnam prisons because his father was in charge of the Hanoi Hilton, under the direction of the Soviet armed forces. One of these prisoners was McCain, shot down, wounded and captured on Oct. 26, 1967. The following July, McCain's father, Adm. J.S. McCain, was made commander of all military forces in the Vietnam theater. Upon learning this, the Vietnamese offered to release the younger McCain....
"Yet the offer of release would have to have been approved by the Soviet overseers of the North Vietnamese, and the translator does not recall any such offer being made. McCain's rejection of early release may have caused the offer to be dropped before high-level discussions.
"According to the translator, McCain made an 'accommodation' with his captors, and, in exchange, the translator's father saw to it that he was provided with an apartment in Hanoi and the services of two prostitutes. Upon returning to his prison cell, he would say he had been held in solitary confinement.
"That may be why so many of his fellow prisoners said later they saw so little of him at Hoa Loa Prison," [Jack] Wheeler suggested. [Wheeler is a Republican insider described as 'extremely well connected and a fascinating geopolitical analyst credited with being one of the architects of the Reagan Doctrine.'] [American Free Press, supra]

One cannot help but wonder if John McCain is a member of long standing in the Council on Foreign Affairs. It's long reach might have assured John McCain "boogie nights" in Las Orient Vegas.

3.) "In November of 1991, when Tracy Usry, the former chief investigator for the minority staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, testified before the Select Committee, he said the Soviets interrograted U.S. prisoners of war in Vietnam. McCain, incensed, rudely interrupted Usry several times, yelling that 'none of the returned U.S. POW's released by Vietnam was ever interrogated by the Soviets.' However, the evidence shows that McCain was lying and had first-hand knowledge that the charge was true, unless he had been programmed to forget it...." [American Free Press, supra]

As Testy John is the attack dog of some really sinister forces in America, there is not much chance that anyone will see his "spots change." He may be deranged. Consider:

4.) "Negative information written over the years about John McCain by those who know him best is immense, and it all is surfacing again with his run for the White House....Most fellow senators discuss his shortcomings only in private, of course, but a large number believe him to be psychologically unstable. Some, such as former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), and Sens. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) and Dick Shelby (R-Ala.) have related the times McCain screamed four-letter obscenities in their faces in the Senate cloakroom.
"'The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine,' said Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) Another who preferred to remain unnamed said, 'The man is unhinged. He is frighteningly unfit to be commander-in-chief.' " [American Free Press, supra)

Well, if it is any comfort, McCain's Jewish controls won't let him runamuck. He will be a sort of incarnate guided missile, blowing up Iran and other "rogue" states (assuming that "W" doesn't beat him to the kill.) If need be, Testy John can be poisoned, perhaps allowing the more stable personality of Mitt Romney, or some similar type, to ascend to the "colonial hotseat." At any rate it should be an interesting election.

IS THE WHITE HOUSE NEW FRONT FOR ORGANIZED CRIME?

2008-02-12T19:03:00.000-08:00

Although I haven't been attending to the chase for the White House too carefully so far, I believe that the media has settled on Senator John McCain for the Republicans and Obama/Clinton for the Democrats. In the latter case the issue isn't absolutely clear, but the media seem inclined toward Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton.

My hunch is that the race will finally be between Hillary and John, the Terrorist Slayer. I may be wrong, but the Clintons are experienced "in-fighters" and know how to suddenly and magically get the required votes. Mr. Billy Jeff Clinton has hung around C.I.A. "agents of change" long enough to reliably get the necessary number of votes. No doubt, his dear friend "Daddy" Bush could give him some pointers, if any were needed.

One of the most interesting things about the Clintons has been the "body count" that has tolled in the lengthy wake of their political careers. The great bulk of the suspicious deaths occurred in Arkansas, usually to people who got a peek at the drug-running into Mena, Arkansas, allegedly by contract operatives of the C.I.A., or who knew too much about the suspicious deaths or other unlawful acivities, such as "hits," the Whitewater speculations, and so on. However, from Ron Brown to Vince Foster the body count continued along with the Clintons to Washington, D.C.

For a long time I've speculated that "Murder, Incorporated" never ceased to exist, but rather it was a test project that was deemed a success and moved on up into the federal government, although not exclusively there. Meyer Lansky was the real leader of the syndicate, but he himself may have been a "pawn in the game." This, if true, would give more than a little hint at the shadowy power that informs and controls the Resident Evil, which itself controls the U.S.A. and spreads across the industrialized world, sucking the vitality out of the former nation-states.

It seems a good bet that the C.I.A. itself was infiltrated by the Syndicate spirit, judging from the not infrequent association with "organized crime" for this project or that, as well as its participation in opium and cocaine distribution. I believe that "protection" may have been another moneymaking racket.

Meyer Lansky had a daughter named Mira Lansky who married, it seems, someone named "Boland." Mira Lansky Boland was, and possibly still is, an attorney employed by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith ["ADL"], the alleged unregistered agent of the State of Israel (sic). The ADL operates, amongst other things, a spying section, which collects dossiers on people it believes are a "threat" to Jewry. Spying, lawsuits, and lobbying influential people and associations seem to be the top activities, but you never know the real purpose of "intelligence" operations. They don't seem to be benign at any rate.

All such groups as the C.I.A. and A.D.L. seem to hover in the background of the Clintons. They seem to know a lot of powerful folks all around the globe. There is a good bet such people are not benign, either. Billy Jeff Clinton is said to be a rapist, amongst other allegations. Funny thing is that he always seems to prevail. With such luck it isn't surprising that more charges of rape, suspicious deaths, etc., seem to keep cropping up. Billy Jeff Clinton is some sort of serial something. No one seems to want to say what. Maybe it's the body count factor.

As for Hillary, she was described by some journalist as an unreconstructed "Bolshevik." Also, she has been described as a "street-fighting radical," as I recall. If so, she's a rich one now, as she is said to be worth $50 million. She's come a long way since Don Tyson took her under his "chicken wing," to run a few thousand dollars into $100,000.

The Clintons weren't the first nor last cast of "shady" characters Americans have swooned over and put in the White House (assuming ballot counting is roughly honest). This leads to the question: Are the American people just a bunch of petty criminals who naturally are attracted to the "big bad boys" (and girls)? There is clearly something wrong--bad wrong--with the American culture. Need more evidence?

According to a lengthy article appearing in the American Free Press, written by well-known author Michael Collins Piper, Senator John McCain is the beneficiary of highly dubious power-brokers. The article states that "The Bronfmans are the 'godfathers' behind the political career of John McCain." The article continues: "McCain's father-in-law got his start as a top henchman for Kemper Marley, who, for 40 years until his death in 1990 at age 84, was the undisputed behind-the scenes political boss of Arizona. But Marley was much more than a machine politician. In fact, he was also the Lansky crime syndicate's top man in Arizona, the protege of a Lansky lieutenant, Phoenix gambler Gus Greenbaum."

Now,it should be noted that John McCain married Jim Hensley's daughter, Cindy. Jim Hensley worked for Kemper Marley, and it is said that he took "the fall" for Kemper during a federal liquor violations investigation. When Hensley got out of prison, Marley set him up in the beer distribution business, which is said today to be "worth $200 million." It is "what largely financed John McCain's political career. The support from the Bronfman-Marley-Hensley network was integral to McCain's rise to power."

As Elizabeth Taylor noted: "Money is the best deodorant." Well, certainly in America, it makes a lot of difference.

Interestingly, the lawyer handling the Hensley legal defense, at least in one major instance was later to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It was William Rehnquist "who handled Hensley's legal defense, forging the deal that set in motion Hensley's windfall (that now benefits McCain). Rehnquist was to be later "joined on the court by one of his own former girlfriends from Arizona, Sandra Day O'Connor."

This article is chock full of names such as Sam Bronfman, Meyer Lansky, Edgar Bronfman, the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Armand Hammer, Jack Ruby, Gus Greenbaum, Kemper Marley, Benjamin "Budsy" Siegel, Al Lizanitz,Jacobs and, of course, Jim Hensley (John McCain's father-in-law).

The article speculates that this association may be natural. According to it, "Doing Israel's bidding is a McCain family tradition. Following Israel's 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, resulting in the murder of 34 Americans, McCain's father, Adm. John McCain, was one of the key players inside the U.S. Navy helping cover up the deliberate nature of Israel's savage attack. 'Like father, like son' clearly means something when it comes to the McCains."

Yet, it would be wrong to say that John McCain is personally guilty of any unsavory deeds. His wife cannot be responsible for her father's legal mistakes, either. Nevertheless, can one dwell near sewage without picking up a hint of foulness? His innocence isn't known with certainty either. We must be brave enough to face the issues of our time. We know that a significant portion of the problems that Americans face can be met in the mirrors of scores of millions of homes each day. We have met the enemy: He is us! Babylon, mon amour.

DUST

2008-02-07T16:16:00.000-08:00

As I prepared to assume the position before my keyboard and punch out some words, I slowly became aware that my keyboard had a sort of hoary patina. I ran my finger along the surface and checked out my skin. There was a grey, fuzzy coat on the surface. What is this? I wondered.

As I looked about my little office, I saw that the surfaces of most everything bore a thin coating of this stuff. What's going on? I asked myself.

This office is sealed. Nothing can enter a window. The doorway, of course, might let in a some "particles" suspended in the air. Still, why doesn't it go to the floor. Reason would dictate that gravity would force these particles onto my carpet, where it could be vacuumed and removed, which is a process offered each Saturday, when good folks come in to attend to this particular matter. Yet, I find that dust has settled upon loftily situated furnishings and equipment about as evenly and thickly (or thinly, depending on perspective in these matters) as on those lowly situated.

I know, cold, that Mother Nature is not an equalitarian by her very --excuse the expression--nature. Mother Nature doesn't care who or what is high or low. It is true that ultimately "Mom" brings everyone and everything down low. Entrophy? Whatever! This cannot be the explanation.

I have a theory that there is a microcosmic force here on earth (and especially in sealed or almost sealed rooms) whereby dusty particles are "created" out of nothing. The force must be similar to the formation of stars. In space elemental units are forced together to build larger materials, which, again, are drawn together firmly, until the process reaches some kind of critical mass and bursts into starlight. Why can't the same process account for dust in enclosed areas? [It might even explain "spontaneous" combustion!]

This would also perhaps explain why dust isn't necessarily uniform. A quark here, a charm there, a missing meson over yonder, and before you know it, a distinct particle of dust is born. Folks, they aren't all the same.

I've seen dust particles that seemed incredibly sticky, while other layers of dust were like a mercury sheen. Some dust is gritty, while other dust is soft. And some dust you dare not even touch, due to its dangerous or repellant character. Breathe in the "wrong" kind of dust and it could be "curtains."

The point that I'm trying to make is that dust warrants a lot more study before we can confidently reach a modus vivendi. Remember what Zwingali said (paraphrased): "There's more under the heavens and upon this earth than your sciences dreamt of." And Trilby can vouch for that!

Drive-In Movies

2008-02-04T16:41:00.000-08:00

Although the old "drive-in" movies seem to be a thing of the past, good ideas don't just completely go away. This is the way it is with the fabulous, really-big screen of the drive-ins. The convenience and opportunities (!) of the parked car at the movies could not simply "go away." The idea has been renovated, so to speak, and expanded in many new directions. Now, it is entirely possible for a "crusing" to include an in-car theatre, either by means of DVDs or downloading to a laptop a Netflix movie or some other film source. Even the cell phones are moving toward portable "drive-ins." As a matter of fact, a cruiser can make his home or a buddy's an alternate drive-in spot. Talk about the comforts of home! The options are there

The old drive-in movie lives in new venues. The old conveniences offered by the drive-in movie (and opportunities) have not been lost but relocated into modes congenial with contemporary technology. They will change some more in the future, but Friday and Saturday night cruising will still find a way to continue the convenience and fun of the old drive-ins. Life will find a way, tis said.

Deciding on a flick can be another issue all together. One CAN guess. I don't recommend guessing. There are a number of ways to get the scoop on a potential movie to see. You can hear from others by means of "scuttlebutt." There are also such options as radio, newspapers, and magazines. I don't use these myself. I go to the internet. One of the new sites I've come across is MoviePressLive (http://www.moviepresslive.com/). It's pretty kool, clowns!

Check it out, pick out a movie, and let the good times roll! Remember the number one rule at the old drive-in movies: Keep your stick high.

EMERGENCIES

2008-01-11T19:26:00.000-08:00

Emergencies are almost defined by their unexpected arrival. There are degrees, of course. I've never had a life-threatening one. I'm greatful for that. Mine tend to be more of the mini-emergency types. There seems to be some kind of scale by which hidden forces allocate the punishment to the undeserving as well as the deserving. Those who don't get thrown onto the operating table are likely to have to pay for their escape by a multitude of little, annoying emergencies. I am such a one.

I often blame GRAVITY for many of my accidents and for my generally klutzy demonstrations. For me this is not merely a scientific phenomenon. No, it borders on some kind of evil force out there. It singles people out to torment, often with a plethora of fumbles and droppings, which draw attention to the victim, as in: "What's his problem?" or "Clown!" [Now, that's getting personal.]

This evening, I was at my tiny office in Fairfax, VA. The property owner, Dino, has allowed the men's room on my floor to go for about two weeks "out of commission." This means that I have to go to the next higher or lower floor to reach a functioning restroom. I welcome the challenge of going up the steps and gaining a little exercise in the bargain.

However, tonight my sense of well-being was disturbed. As is often my fashion when I'm unrushed, I had taken a section of newspaper (in this case The Washington Post) with me, hoping to find an article about me in the Style section (a frequent spot for "hate crimes" to appear). [Ok, so I gave them some questionable advice; that's no reason to become anti-entertainer.]

My business was a serious one. I entered the cubbyhole, where the throne beckoned. I assumed the position of authority, which the occasion warranted. Naturally, I opened the newspaper section and began to scan for something interesting to read. Nothing! Even the advertisements were witless. Disgruntled, my sojourn ready to be terminated, I reached for the mysteriously contrived chamber wherein two rolls of paper usually are to be expected. Nothing! My fingers traced the entire interior of the housing, but they found nothing. What to do? I mused a bit angrily, my fingers tightening their grip on the newspaper. NEWSPAPER. I had brought along a solution to this emergency without premeditation. Another invisible hand had trumped the bringer of bad news (no pun intended). My mini-emergency had clandestinely been "fixed." Parenthetically, I haven't ruled out the existence of "guardian angels."

Incidentally, this is one of the few occasions when GRAVITY may be your friend.

In conclusion a potentially embarrassing situation was overcome, seemingly by a chance decision. I hope that I am wiser from this experience. I know I must live the rest of my life with the watchwords of the Boy Scouts before me: Be Prepared!