OPPORTUNISTS LATCH ONTO MUSEUM SHOOTER

The recent shooting at the Holocaust Museum was both surprising and not surprising. How could such a contradiction exist? The general period of "terror events" has increased sharply enough that the American public is quite aware of them. They occur all over the globe. Our own government warns us fairly often, using a simple color-coded system, that a terror event may well happen here. F.B.I. "informants" [a word sanctioned by J. Edgar Hoover so that words such as "fink" or "snitch" would not have to be used] warn their controls of something suspicious, the color code warning is changed, and the media goes to work "agitating" Americans that they may be in danger. Guests appear on various media outlets to discuss likely spots that might be targeted by terrorists.

Almost always, the media paints a spectrum of villains that include Muslim "fanatics," Far-Right "Christrian" extremists, Neo-Nazis, Ku Klux Klansmen, and the like. If the "villains" are in the service, they most likely will be described as one of the previous groups serving in the military, while clandestinely plotting to blow-up something or other. "Racism" and "Anti-Semitism" are often described as characteristics of some of the above mentioned "terrorism-prone" groups.

In regard to the above groups, which are rarely mentioned without the obligatory "hate-group" designation, "experts" from the Anti-Defamation League of B'Nai B'rith ("ADL") and the Southern Poverty Law Center are called upon. As they are defined as "experts," the general public is conditioned to pay particular heed. Both of these groups also have fairly easy access to important figures in the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives. None of the groups they monitor do. Indeed, most members of such groups would probably quietly be arrested upon stepping onto Capitol Hill. How would anyone know? As mentioned, the two organizational experts spy upon Americans who they believe constitute a threat to the "Jewish World Agenda" (expression of Mr. Corzine of New Jersey) and have easy access to Congress to express their intelligence findings. I heard such a one from the Southern Poverty Law Center on WTOP radio today, June 12, 2009. Predictably and typically, he was "billied" as an expert.

Furthermore, in The Washington Times, Thursday, June 11, 2009, Front page, Article by Gary Emerling and Kristi Jourdan, one finds that "James W. von Brunn...was well-known by experts who monitor hate groups." The sort of experts these "newshounds" reference are those employed by the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The latter organization was founded by Morris Seligman Dees. He had operated a mail-order business for some years. He was able to find a buyer from the Great Lakes area, as I recall, and was able to schlep away with about $3 million. This fortunate sale provided the funding for his Southern Poverty Law Center. This operation was largely a Jewish-African American concern, legally targeting white people and white organizations. As marketing success brought in a "gusher" of contributions - mostly from Jews, the Southern Poverty Law Center could fund spying on Americans all over the country. Nor are these the only Jewish operated spy operations in America.

The concept of private organizations, mostly Jewish, spying on Americans would seem to engender an outcry. It doesn't. Those who do are immediately labelled "Anti-Semite," "racist," "extremists" or "possibly" a terrorist. American politicians and Fedcops schmooze with ADL and Southern Poverty Law Center experts to learn who the "bad guys" are.

However, the "bad guys" don't always seem so bad, when accurately described. As an example, although the "experts" through their energetic "monitoring" were well aware of James W. von Brunn, his move recently to the Chesapeake Bay area of Maryland was apparently quiet. According to The Washington Times article, his "neighbors appeared to know little about his anti-Semitic views or a Web posting on another site in November purportedly by him that warned of enemies in 'Congress, at 'Holocaust' memorials, [and] at synagogues.'"

In the deluded world of Jewish fantasists men such as von Brunn should be walking about in Nazi uniforms screaming "Sieg Hail!" The fact that he was little noticed may be due to the fact that wasn't an extremists at all. It was possible that he was correct in many of his views. In matters of this kind people all too often take the view which they are told to accept in school and the like.

I certainly can attest that in former times when I thought to educate, I found myself looking at an irate individual informing me that what I had said "Wasn't the way he had learned it." Lots of folks can't grow. At the age of seven their heads solidify into a rock impervious to any further education. To talk about the need to "think outside the box" with such people is to express a profound misunderstanding of their potential.

From the above cited media article the reader can learn about his "purported" connection to some Web posting. These "newshounds" don't seem to have made the investigative effort themselves to learn one way or another. They probably learned from "experts," and felt no need to personally investigate the matter.

I believe that it is self-evident that the Messiah, Jahshua of Nazareth, when he drove the moneychangers from the Temple, acted with justified wrath. Yet, this belief is not generally held today. One would be hard-pressed to find a Protestant minister who would approve such actions. Certainly, they have no intention of following his example.

Righteousness is offended by iniquity. There is, unfortunately, little righteousness today. Further, there is the corollary that evil is offended by righteousness. Congress may outlaw it (righteousness).

What are the offending views of Mr. von Brunn? What did he base his views upon. What are the facts? Don't expect the media to dwell on issues but, rather, to release sensationalized "tidbits." Their sources? The above alluded to "experts."

The charge of James W. von Brunn at and into the Holocaust Museum, as with "Picket's Charge," the "Charge of the Light Brigade," and similar desperate actions, was doomed from the outset to be just another isolated incidence of violence. As a propaganda gesture, it was doomed as well, as too few care about the reason for anything. Mr. von Brunn's enemies will define his actions for the history footnote which will prove applicable.

It is interesting to note that Mr. von Brunn's name appears to be Prussian. That reminds me of the World War II episode recently made into a "based upon" movie entitled Valkyrie. That plot against the life of Adolph Hitler was largely - in so much as it was German - led by Prussian officers. In Hollywood's version the conspirators are rendered as heroes. They were the true patriots. In reality the character Tom Cruise played in real life admitted that what they (the conspirators) planned was treason. Viewers of this film are asked (and expected) to be sympathetic toward the plotters as "noble" and the like. The violence, you see, is justified, according to the filmmakers. Killing Hitler and what he stood for was a "good thing."

The plotters against Herr Hitler were warriors for the most part. James W. von Brunn was a warrior, if radio news reports can be credited. The idea of a WW II decorated hero attacking the Holocaust Museum was bad PR for those trying hard to present him as an "extremist nut." Hence, his WW II record may be found and, if necessary, altered.

Why do I say this?

In the Front page article alluded to earlier above, one finds the following: "James W. von Brunn purported to serve aboard a Navy PT boat in a war that liberated Jews from the Nazi concentration camps. A half-century later, the victims of that war had unmistakably become the object of his unrelenting hatred." Besides being a non sequitur, one notices the slant that automatically puts Mr. von Brunn on the scoundrel-side of the equation.

Although these remarkably poorly-educated reporters suppose that America's venture into WW II was to rescue incarcerated Jews, there were not enough Congressional votes to get America into a war with Germany that a majority of the general population didn't want. It was only due to an attack on an American facility on Hawaii by the Japanese AND the mutual-defense treaty between Germany and Japan, that war was declared all around. We were then "in it." Not brought out by either of these fine Times reporters was the fact that neither Winston Churchill nor Dwight David Eisenhower mentioned the "death camps" or genocide in their lengthy descriptions of their parts in WW II. They certainly would have, if they were thought factual, rather than a Jewish fiction.

One might also point out that the victims of that war were the German and Russian people, primarily. The Jews came out of WW II in better condition, more powerful, and wealthier than ever before. Jews have made more money from WW II movies than exists in most countries in the world today.

Furthermore, if Mr. von Brunn "captained" or "served on" a PT Boat, the odds are very good that he served in the Pacific arena. If so, he undoubtedly fought against the Japanese Imperial forces - not Germany. It seems likely that these Times reporters are not aware that two separate wars were going on, one against the Japanese and one against Germany. Since one should also count Italy separately, one should note our war against three nations at that time. None were fought overtly for purposes of rescuing Jews from anything. Incidentally, the Times reporters should be aware that Zionist Jewry declared war on Germany in 1933. When the Germans had unconditionally surrendered, the Jews took revenge, including "death squads."

Parenthetically, under Eisenhower's malevolent supervision, approximately one million German prisoners of war basically starved to death, died of related diseases, or were shot by drunken French troops. See James Bacque's OTHER LOSSES.

The murder of six million Jews in various "Death Camps" - especially Auschwitz -is a demonstrable deceit. The crimes committed against the Germans after their surrender have rarely, if ever, been equaled. The Russians under the Lenin/Stalin regimes may have suffered more deaths, as did perhaps the Chinese under Mao Tsetung. However, it is unlikely that any other people have suffered the monetary theft under Allied coersion, as have the Germans. Money is still coerced today as ongoing reparations. More importantly, the psychological harm done to the German people by three generations of guilt-mongering at the direction of the Allies and their puppets in Germany will require decades of counter-methods to restore wholesomeness to an exceptional people who have been exceptionably wronged.

Mr. James W. von Brunn is presented as a 'hater" and "madman." Not knowing the fellow, it is hard for me to say. But I do know his enemies, and that is what makes me suspicious.

IS THE WHITE HOUSE NEW FRONT FOR ORGANIZED CRIME?

Although I haven't been attending to the chase for the White House too carefully so far, I believe that the media has settled on Senator John McCain for the Republicans and Obama/Clinton for the Democrats. In the latter case the issue isn't absolutely clear, but the media seem inclined toward Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton.

My hunch is that the race will finally be between Hillary and John, the Terrorist Slayer. I may be wrong, but the Clintons are experienced "in-fighters" and know how to suddenly and magically get the required votes. Mr. Billy Jeff Clinton has hung around C.I.A. "agents of change" long enough to reliably get the necessary number of votes. No doubt, his dear friend "Daddy" Bush could give him some pointers, if any were needed.

One of the most interesting things about the Clintons has been the "body count" that has tolled in the lengthy wake of their political careers. The great bulk of the suspicious deaths occurred in Arkansas, usually to people who got a peek at the drug-running into Mena, Arkansas, allegedly by contract operatives of the C.I.A., or who knew too much about the suspicious deaths or other unlawful acivities, such as "hits," the Whitewater speculations, and so on. However, from Ron Brown to Vince Foster the body count continued along with the Clintons to Washington, D.C.

For a long time I've speculated that "Murder, Incorporated" never ceased to exist, but rather it was a test project that was deemed a success and moved on up into the federal government, although not exclusively there. Meyer Lansky was the real leader of the syndicate, but he himself may have been a "pawn in the game." This, if true, would give more than a little hint at the shadowy power that informs and controls the Resident Evil, which itself controls the U.S.A. and spreads across the industrialized world, sucking the vitality out of the former nation-states.

It seems a good bet that the C.I.A. itself was infiltrated by the Syndicate spirit, judging from the not infrequent association with "organized crime" for this project or that, as well as its participation in opium and cocaine distribution. I believe that "protection" may have been another moneymaking racket.

Meyer Lansky had a daughter named Mira Lansky who married, it seems, someone named "Boland." Mira Lansky Boland was, and possibly still is, an attorney employed by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith ["ADL"], the alleged unregistered agent of the State of Israel (sic). The ADL operates, amongst other things, a spying section, which collects dossiers on people it believes are a "threat" to Jewry. Spying, lawsuits, and lobbying influential people and associations seem to be the top activities, but you never know the real purpose of "intelligence" operations. They don't seem to be benign at any rate.

All such groups as the C.I.A. and A.D.L. seem to hover in the background of the Clintons. They seem to know a lot of powerful folks all around the globe. There is a good bet such people are not benign, either. Billy Jeff Clinton is said to be a rapist, amongst other allegations. Funny thing is that he always seems to prevail. With such luck it isn't surprising that more charges of rape, suspicious deaths, etc., seem to keep cropping up. Billy Jeff Clinton is some sort of serial something. No one seems to want to say what. Maybe it's the body count factor.

As for Hillary, she was described by some journalist as an unreconstructed "Bolshevik." Also, she has been described as a "street-fighting radical," as I recall. If so, she's a rich one now, as she is said to be worth $50 million. She's come a long way since Don Tyson took her under his "chicken wing," to run a few thousand dollars into $100,000.

The Clintons weren't the first nor last cast of "shady" characters Americans have swooned over and put in the White House (assuming ballot counting is roughly honest). This leads to the question: Are the American people just a bunch of petty criminals who naturally are attracted to the "big bad boys" (and girls)? There is clearly something wrong--bad wrong--with the American culture. Need more evidence?

According to a lengthy article appearing in the American Free Press, written by well-known author Michael Collins Piper, Senator John McCain is the beneficiary of highly dubious power-brokers. The article states that "The Bronfmans are the 'godfathers' behind the political career of John McCain." The article continues: "McCain's father-in-law got his start as a top henchman for Kemper Marley, who, for 40 years until his death in 1990 at age 84, was the undisputed behind-the scenes political boss of Arizona. But Marley was much more than a machine politician. In fact, he was also the Lansky crime syndicate's top man in Arizona, the protege of a Lansky lieutenant, Phoenix gambler Gus Greenbaum."

Now,it should be noted that John McCain married Jim Hensley's daughter, Cindy. Jim Hensley worked for Kemper Marley, and it is said that he took "the fall" for Kemper during a federal liquor violations investigation. When Hensley got out of prison, Marley set him up in the beer distribution business, which is said today to be "worth $200 million." It is "what largely financed John McCain's political career. The support from the Bronfman-Marley-Hensley network was integral to McCain's rise to power."

As Elizabeth Taylor noted: "Money is the best deodorant." Well, certainly in America, it makes a lot of difference.

Interestingly, the lawyer handling the Hensley legal defense, at least in one major instance was later to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It was William Rehnquist "who handled Hensley's legal defense, forging the deal that set in motion Hensley's windfall (that now benefits McCain). Rehnquist was to be later "joined on the court by one of his own former girlfriends from Arizona, Sandra Day O'Connor."

This article is chock full of names such as Sam Bronfman, Meyer Lansky, Edgar Bronfman, the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Armand Hammer, Jack Ruby, Gus Greenbaum, Kemper Marley, Benjamin "Budsy" Siegel, Al Lizanitz,Jacobs and, of course, Jim Hensley (John McCain's father-in-law).

The article speculates that this association may be natural. According to it, "Doing Israel's bidding is a McCain family tradition. Following Israel's 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, resulting in the murder of 34 Americans, McCain's father, Adm. John McCain, was one of the key players inside the U.S. Navy helping cover up the deliberate nature of Israel's savage attack. 'Like father, like son' clearly means something when it comes to the McCains."

Yet, it would be wrong to say that John McCain is personally guilty of any unsavory deeds. His wife cannot be responsible for her father's legal mistakes, either. Nevertheless, can one dwell near sewage without picking up a hint of foulness? His innocence isn't known with certainty either. We must be brave enough to face the issues of our time. We know that a significant portion of the problems that Americans face can be met in the mirrors of scores of millions of homes each day. We have met the enemy: He is us! Babylon, mon amour.