IRAN MON AMOUR?

Today, I was "clowning around" while listening to the "traffic" radio station for a little forecast of what lay ahead, when I cranked up my act and rolled out of my #1 tent. Now, it so happens that they provide "breaking news and analysis" as well. My timing was such that I "got in" at the beginning of an international intelligence analysis of the Iranians firing off a missile in a test.

This station's lead reporter ( named "J.J.") was giving a typically slanted report, utilizing insider information gleaned undoubtedly from three sources: the Israelis, the Arbusto (Spanish for "bush") Likudites, and that modern new and most dangerous hybrid, the "military-industrial-think tank-academic complex." The latter are comprised of "straw men" searching for a brain, and the Israelis are playing the "Wizard of Oz" to give them needed reassurances.

There is an immense "beating of the war-drums" in regard to Iran, orchestrated by the Israelis-World Jewry interests. Iran is relentlessly pictured as an "aggressor nation," as a "terrorist threat," as the "premier destabilizing element in Iraq," as a "threat to our troops," and, most important of all, a "threat to the very existence of Israel." Get real!

Israel is about the fourth most powerful nation in the world, considered strictly by itself. When you throw in its colony of U.S. Federal America, which controls the U.S.A., then you have the far and away most powerful force on earth. Add in the controlled or heavily- influenced Great Britain and its Commonwealth, the power gets even greater. The ruling circles of France are completely intertwined with Jewry, and France is competitive with the U.S. in "electing" Jewish leaders, partially Jewish leaders, and men whose hands have long been under the dominant Jewish "loincloth."

Germany is still an occupied country. Reparations to the Israeli state and Jews individually (paid in German money) have allowed "successful" reinvestment in the most pivotable business groups: media, entertainment, finance/real estate among others. This does bring influence, which can be brought to bear on German politicians, so much so, that only a few years back, The Washington Post broke away from "drum-beating" for unlawful entry by the "world community" into America (typically on "humane" grounds) to joyfully salute the 100,000 ,or so, Jews who have moved back into Germany, opening synagogues and making themselves "comfy."

The Russian Republic under Vladimir Putin did try to improve its relationship with Muslim nations in the Levant, which has been loudly bruited about (so there can hardly be a secret) that Russia might be a threat to the Israeli state, too. If not directly, then certainly indirectly. What is not stated is that about 25% of the population of the Israeli state is comprised of Jews from Russia, who are still Russian-speaking, culturally-influenced, have relatives living in Russia, and who are the primary forces behind the Marxist aspects of the Israeli state, including its atheism. The whole Zionist movement was composed of people who were as comfortable with Marxism as with Judaism. The former arose from concepts in the latter. In short, Vladimir Putin and the Israelis have had comfortable dialog from almost the "getgo," and these two nations eagerly seek trade relationships between one another. The Israelis have long had a very close working relationship with the Peoples Republic of China, regularly selling to the Chinese classified U.S. industrial and hightech information and hardware. Recently, the Israelis have developed a close relationship with the Indians. Both the rapid industrial-hightech development in India and China and the rise of the price of oil per barrel are unthinkable without American, European and Israeli Jews working to make it happen.

Given this sort of diplomatic power, why would anyone think that the relatively small and surrounded nation of Iran would, apparently for religio-ideological reasons--and welcoming its suicidal consequence, launch a nuclear genocide against the Israeli state? If you listen to Washington, D.C., news reports (or read them), you would suppose that it is a high probability event. Because this sort of assertion is "nuts," the Washington "newshounds, pundits, and eggheads" must assert that it is precisely because the Iranian leaders are "insane," that this threat is credible. Folks, they are the crazy ones. And possibly downright evil in the bargain. I'm not "clowning!"

The Israeli state possesses something in excess of 200 hundred nuclear devices. They may have twice that many. They have them in all sizes, as the Jews are very good at "tweaking" weapons, once they get their paws on them. This nation undoubtedly has an array of defensive missiles also. In so much as the U.S. produces such missiles, it is an "odds on bet" that the Israelis have gotten them, although it may have been given to them sub rosa. They may have obtained them from other countries as well. By now, they are in a strong position. Still, they do want to extend their property lines into Eretz Israel--the massive chunk of the Levant that allegedly was controlled by King David. Usefully, this turf contains quite a lot of oil. It is also a key strategic location between East and West.

Both the U.S. and the Israeli state have repeatedly bombed and invaded other countries. The U.S. has the world's most dubious record of having dropped atom bombs on two Japanese cities--Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The U.S. sees its "interests" all over the world, sees "madmen" everywhere, and attacks them everywhere. This allows its "control" to be a bit more discreet, attacking mostly neighbors, including Africans, which have had numerous destabling "events" over the last forty years. Of course, the Israelis aren't the only ones playing the African game of "Who's the strong man?" Both the U.S. and Israelis have a long record of fomenting a problem and then denouncing the surprised adversary. Clean hands? Get real!

When I was much younger, the U.S. began to "seep" vital military information to the U.S.S.R. The Soviets began to explode nuclear weapons. Alien intellectuals such as Henry Kissinger and ZBigBrother began to preach that the only safe course to take under these dangerous circumstances was "Mutually Assured Destruction." The U.S. and the Soviet Union should seek "parity" in nuclear weapons, so as to make an attack by either "suicidal." Peaceful coexistence could then follow. Hopefully, in time, the two nations would find their economic systems merging. Friendship would follow. This was the theoretical model bandied about.

Rather than seeing the U.S. and the Israelis bombing and invading other countries of the Levant on an never-ending basis (or until sufficient "puppets" can be installed and provided with secret police to enforce "democracy"), I'd like to see a certain "coolness" exhibited. Let Iran become the "designated opposition" (correlative of the U.S.S.R.), whose nuclear weapons force it and the Israelis into "peaceful coexistence."

There is one thing that I've learned in life: bullies like to bully folks much smaller and weaker than they. Equality of size usually causes bullies to "chill out." However, there is the possibility that the real problem is that the "forces of democracy" just can't tolerate diversity.