NINE ELEVEN

“Oh, what tangled webs we weave, when first we practice to deceive!”

“By way of deception” [Mossad motto, alluding to the advice on strategy suggested by a Jewish sage]

America’s leadership contains circles that have been and are typically deceitful. They also seem to be well-integrated with both the British and the Israelis. They have set up innumerable organizations – often bearing titles suggestive of a global policy interest – to produce essays and orators to propagandize their perspective on major issues. Sometimes an issue they “push” may seem marginal, but they have always thought several steps ahead so that one can be certain that the seemingly marginal issue will tie importantly to a major issue in the future.

The major media, which has been owned or influenced by these same “masters of deceit,” frequently features one of their propagandists on “op ed” pages or their correlative on the major television networks. Crucial positions such as “managing editor” have almost always been in their hands so they have been able to filter out unwanted information that might confuse their readers or viewers.

Incidentally, the term “masters of deceit” was employed as the title of a book by F.B.I. Director J. Edgar Hoover. I believe that it was published in the ‘50s and dealt with the nefarious doings of communist agents, especially the U.S.S.R.’s, in America. Ironically, his book came out just prior to the big push to do a political make-over of the constitution and government of the United States of America without visible deconstruction. The structure need not be radically changed, if the words that constructed it are slyly changed by interpretation. 

Thus, the United States of America became a Marxist country by means of the suggestions of Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci, whose political strategy envisioned a transformation of the culture of a society, leading to a transformation of the society itself, rather than a bloody revolution and coerced imposition of Marxist-Leninist doctrines.

Parenthetically, if a nation state controls its wealth, the leadership of that nation – in effect – control its wealth. It would be normal to enjoy plenty in any society. While the ordinary workers may not have access to it, that fact would not preclude the leaders, who always do have access, from discreetly enjoying it. Such was the case in the U.S.S.R where the Marxist-Leninist leadership maintained stores filled with plenty, including luxury items, while the proletariat stores were notoriously bare of items.

All of this has been entered here as a supporting structure to my point about the deceitful American leadership circles.

Although these circles have conspired to create “events of terror” on a regular basis at least since the ‘80s, as can be witnessed by the Murrah building explosion in Oklahoma City, OK, the Ruby Ridge assault in Idaho, and the Waco holocaust, none of their previous nefarious deeds would matched their 9/11 attack.

The fact that all of the above were heavy-handed, senseless acts of carnage and were also characterized as acts of official cover-up suggest an ulterior motivation, which itself suggests they originated among theorists employed by the Resident Evil presently ruling America.

Not very many people in America have really thought too much about the label attached to the catastrophic attack on the World Trade Center’s twin towers. It was quickly labeled “9/11.” If one were to add these two numbers, then one would have the sum “20.” If one were to translate the sum “20” into Roman Latin, then one would have the sum “XX.” What is “XX?” It is the figurative form of “double cross.”

Most American know what the expression “double cross” means or suggests. But how many Americans know that intelligence groups have actually used the term “XX” to thinly disguise a disinformation stratagem? Would American ruling circles do the same?

Consider the British Double-Cross System, or XX System, used during World War 2 (“II”). According to Wikipedia it was an anti-espionage and deception operation of the British Security Service, usually referred to by its cover title MI5. It was used very effectively against the Nazi regime in Germany. It was overseen by the Twenty Committee, which was under the chairmanship of John Cecil Masterman. It was a name clearly chosen for its droll alternate meaning, which more rawly stated its purpose and modus operandi.

I propose and do believe that the choice of “9/11” both for calendar date of attack and for popular appellation was done by a powerful, secretive ruling circle in the United States, assisted by their propagandists in the academic-intellectual-creative complex, and that this group at once understood and relished its terror event’s disguised “XX” meaning. I further believe that both the British and Israeli intelligence service(s) were aware of the planned “9/11” event and were involved to some unknown extent.

The full future ramifications of the “9/11” attacks will be manifested in the sweet bye-n-bye.

FNP: ROCKEFELLER & TURNER EYE REFUGEE PROBLEM

Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

NEWS BRIEF

Representatives of President Obama at the White House have briefed selected news outlets about new initiatives being undertaken to bring relief to growing numbers of refugees around the world. When FNP reporter Freddy Dunne was quietly informed, he was advised that, barring a pandemic that eliminated vast numbers of humans on Earth, responsible nations of the world community would have to “create” new lands. He advised our man Dunne to request briefings on this matter from the David Rockefeller camp and from the Ted Turner camp, who were the quiet “impels” working behind the scene to find solutions to “human issue” problems affecting “our evolving world.”

FNP had some experience with both camps in the past. Realizing that both men were members of the Lucis Trust (formerly Lucifer Publication Company), our staff guessed that they may have both embraced an “enlightened” approach to problems involving masses of people and were acting as a clandestine, common front.

The Lucis Trust was founded in 1922 by Alice Bailey and her husband Foster Bailey. She has been dubbed the “Mother of the New Age Movement.” It is the Publishing House which prints and disseminates United Nations material. In the past it has published arcane knowledge. Both the words “Lucis” and “Lucifer” derive from the Latin word lucem, meaning “of light.” Hence, these adherents of the Luciferian Path imagine themselves to be the “spear-tips of enlightenment.” The mythic figure Prometheus is typically held to be a kind of symbol of what the “right-thinking” person of today should be.

FNP will note that Ted Turner’s softly caustic criticisms of Christianity were founded upon such “right-thinking.” He was the founder of the Goodwill Games, as well, attracting athletes from around the world. It was meant to be a cultural “bridge” between the USA & USSR during a chilly point in the super-powers’ relationship.

The Rockefeller connection to the Lucis Trust should be apparent to FNP readers generally, as most of our readers are aware that the Rockefellers provided the land in Manhattan upon which the United Nations presently rests. David Rockefeller has proudly boasted of his globalist perspective.

From President Obama’s point of view these two allied circles of power would be ideal “solutions-finders” to growing human resource problems around the globe. For that reason he asked FNP and other news outlets to favorably report on the efforts which they might attempt.

As an independent, non-ad-dependent news organization, FNP never approaches any story except to “tell it like it is.”

In pursuing our White House lead, FNP reached out to Dr. Henry Kissinger for elaboration on the Rockefeller-Turner thinking about the global refugee problems.

As a sort of preamble, Dr. Kissinger gave a brief history of the migration of people, especially under duress. He noted that at this time of Islamic unrest, Western intelligence organizations were forced to create civil disorders based on religion and ethnic/racial identities. However, he noted, the wholesale dumping of disparate peoples on America and Europe may be reaching a critical mass, which might become dangerously explosive. For the short term, he said, Canada and Australia can still be used to dump refugees in, but the time had arrived to create new “lands” where none presently suitably exist or don’t exist at all.

According to Dr. Kissinger, the Georgia-born Ted Turner visited with some Atlanta chums, and their discussion turned to global human resource problems. One of his friends, Caleb Dorr Whitefence, asked Mr. Turner if he had any recollection of Atlantis – the island. 

“Didn’t it vanish beneath the sea – was it the Atlantic Ocean? - thousands of years ago?” asked Ted Turner. Then, “wheels began to turn” in the group’s heads. Caleb asked Mr. Turner, “Ted, couldn’t that myth provide the answer to this global problem?” 

After thoroughly examining the possibilities of an “Atlantis Solution,” Ted Turner called his friends at the Lucis Trust, requesting a meeting as soon as possible.

According to a reliable source who attended this meeting, Mr. Turner cordially greeted David Rockefeller, Bishop Moore, Rabbi Tanenbaum, and even addressed an oil painting of Walter Cronkite which hung on a wall in the reception room. After all the Luciferians had taken a seat, Ted Turner began his address by citing a recent – but all too common problem – which had recently been reported on CNN.

“In Myanmar the government refuses to recognize a Muslim ethnic minority, the Rohingya, and these people are considered stateless. They have been persecuted, and have sought to migrate to Indonesia, Israel, India and other locales without welcome. I have asked you here today to consider some long-term solutions, barring a tragic pandemic sweeping through the ranks of the ignoranti.”

According to our source at this meeting, there was considerable interest in Mr. Turner’s topic for discussion. David Rockefeller earnestly asked Ted to “Hasten hurriedly, please, as I’m certain that we all eagerly await your address.”

At this point Ted Turner began to outline his rationale and proposed course of action. Noting the words of Dionne Warwick’s song about what the world needs, “We don’t need another mountain, there are mountains enough for everyone…,” Ted firmly stated his belief that the United Nations must create new lands. “How?” he asked.

Bringing forth a projection camera, he rapidly assembled a screen. Lights dimmed in the reception room, which was exceedingly rare, and Ted began to make his case.

According to FNP’s source, Ted Turner showed all the gathered vast ranges of high mountains from the Himalayan to the Karakorum. He then showed the vast watery desert of the central and southern Indian Ocean. These must become “man and wife.” His description of a vast mountain-removal program that would liberate inhabitable lands for use by hundreds of millions of people, if need be, excited the gathered dignitaries without portfolios. They were equally amazed and excited by Ted’s plan to construct giant new island continents in the Indian Ocean. He pointed out the problem of waste management across advanced national economies. The mountains and the waste will be the building blocks of new world continents upon which excess human resources can find a new Garden of Eden to seize and cultivate. “Think of the food abundance that could be the fruit derived from the lands where frigid, brutish mountains now sit!” he exclaimed. “Fresh-water lakes can be created on the new continents by dragging and planting Antarctic icebergs.”

FNP was advised that at this point, the enlightened audience leapt to their feet, cheering madly. Their mission would now be to bring Ted’s Promethean light to the United Nations and the world community.

This astonishing ambition by some of the “movers-n-shakers” of the world will be monitored honestly by FNP, even if other major outlets “put on a happy face.”