Wednesday, February 20, 2008

MR. GROUCHY FOR PRESIDENT?

The thought of Israel Firster John McCain as President of the United States of America just doesn't sit well with me. It seems that a nation ought to be able to find someone for president who's out for America first. Supporters of John McCain say he is a patriot and supports America, as do most veterans. If he does support America, he most likely does in the sense of the "PanAmerican Union," favored by the Rockefeller condominium of powerful people and organizations.

As a long time disciple of Zionism's Trotskyites-turned-neo-conservatives, which crowd manifest itself like some form of advanced skin-cancer, dotting the surface of the Arbusto presidency, there can be little doubt what foreign policies he'll follow: Kill Israeli enemies, John, kill Israeli enemies! Given his alleged mental instability and outbursts of rage, his controllers may keep him on doses of thorazine most of the time--just as a precaution.

Some critics have, in fact, suggested that John McCain is a Manchurian Candidate of some sort. Although most ordinary American citizens who have had military experience look upon Testy John as a sound, manly patriot, this view is typically founded on their own fantasies, rather than facts and credible evidence. Consider some of the counter evidence:

1.) Dennis Johnson, a graduate of Officer Candidate School, was brought into Hanoi with a broken leg that was never treated. He saw McCain only a few times but heard much about his clean clothes, being showered and clean shaven and always with a few NVA officers during his stint at the "Hilton."
"He received special treatment and was sent to the hospital days after he arrived because he agreed to cooperate, and yes, he did give radio broadcasts for the NVA, not only to North Vietnam but broadcast over the camp speakers," Johnson said. "None of the other prisoners wanted anything to do with him because of these issues. It makes me sick to hear him called a war hero. He was worse than Fonda, for she was just an idiot, but McCain was supposed to be one of us." [American Free Press, February 18, 2008, p.11, art. by Pat Shannan]

I submit to you that if he is elected president, the day will soon arrived when men and women throughout this land will say: He was supposed to be one of us." The fact that the media has welcomed his advance on the White House and treated him kindly reflects McCain's widely known support of the Israeli cause (fighting "rogue states"--mostly non-docile states occupying Eretz Israel). His election would speed up the transition of a sovereign U.S.A. into an Israeli Colony, run by a governing Supreme Colonial Council. What is de facto may well become de jure under two John McCain administrations.

Mr. Mitt Romney has gotten on board with Testy John. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em! He may well hope to be the Vice President to McCain's President Grouchy. (This opens up the possibility of President Grouchy being replaced by President Groucho.) For surely the possibility of the "mean old man" dying in office hasn't eluded Mitt Romney.

Mr. Romney is a Mormon. This is a religion that, among other things, believes that the Anglo-Saxon people are descended from the Northern Kingdom of Israel and are, therefore, primarily the seed of Ephraim and Manasseh. This is probably correct. But what is truly bizarre about the Mormons is that the think that Jews are descended from the Judahites. Jews are known to be a mixed multitude. The seedlines of Esau, Canaan, and Ismael had found their way into the Southern Kingdom before the advent of Yahshua. At the time of Yahshua's tribulations, the High Priest Caiphas, the king Herod, and most of their priests and courtiers were Edomite Jews. No wonder some of them told Yahshua that they were of the seed of Abraham but had never been slaves!

The point of all this is to say that Mitt Romney will bend to the will of the Jews, as he tries to please them. Radio station WTOP is owned by Mormons. They have installed a vast crew of Jews to address the issues of the day. Needless to say, material omissions are the order of the day--every day. As an example, Mr. Ron Paul is hardly ever mentioned as a candidate for president. Mr. Tancredi was dismissed as a "one-issue" (immigration) candidate. WTOP loves the Latino invasion. Hardly a day goes by without scary references to Iran. Most "experts" sought out by this station are Jews or "terrorist-mongers."

Parenthetically, no one has ever explained to me how "democracy" can exist with minority rule. At one time Jewish-led political forces, including media, inveighed against the "tyranny of the majority" (democracy). Now that a Jewish dominated minority-rule government is in place, criticism of this situation brings forth hoodlums to decry "anti-semitism." In about 100 years Jews managed to immigrate from Europe and Russia and install themselves as practically the dictatorship of the "workers" (the term now must include those who had a job, or at one time wanted a job, as well as those who hold jobs now).

Don't look for "Christian" preachers or Catholic priests to come forth to preach the merits of our original form of government. To them goodies come from blessing Jews.

Therefore, the favorite of the neo-con Jews is John McCain. Therefore the favorite of Zionist "Christians" is likely to be McCain. He may go all the way.

Hold on there, partner. The Clinton gang is still riding, and if Hillary get the nod over Barack Obama, then some of John McCain's "dark secrets" from his POW days may come to the surface. As the Clintons are perfectly acceptable to many Jews (they both have Jewish antecedents, it seems,-- certainly Hillary), a changing of horses may occur in mid-stream, as the saying goes. Consider:

2.) "The Clintons have been talking with a former Soviet translator who was present at interrogations at several North Vietnam prisons because his father was in charge of the Hanoi Hilton, under the direction of the Soviet armed forces. One of these prisoners was McCain, shot down, wounded and captured on Oct. 26, 1967. The following July, McCain's father, Adm. J.S. McCain, was made commander of all military forces in the Vietnam theater. Upon learning this, the Vietnamese offered to release the younger McCain....
"Yet the offer of release would have to have been approved by the Soviet overseers of the North Vietnamese, and the translator does not recall any such offer being made. McCain's rejection of early release may have caused the offer to be dropped before high-level discussions.
"According to the translator, McCain made an 'accommodation' with his captors, and, in exchange, the translator's father saw to it that he was provided with an apartment in Hanoi and the services of two prostitutes. Upon returning to his prison cell, he would say he had been held in solitary confinement.
"That may be why so many of his fellow prisoners said later they saw so little of him at Hoa Loa Prison," [Jack] Wheeler suggested. [Wheeler is a Republican insider described as 'extremely well connected and a fascinating geopolitical analyst credited with being one of the architects of the Reagan Doctrine.'] [American Free Press, supra]

One cannot help but wonder if John McCain is a member of long standing in the Council on Foreign Affairs. It's long reach might have assured John McCain "boogie nights" in Las Orient Vegas.

3.) "In November of 1991, when Tracy Usry, the former chief investigator for the minority staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, testified before the Select Committee, he said the Soviets interrograted U.S. prisoners of war in Vietnam. McCain, incensed, rudely interrupted Usry several times, yelling that 'none of the returned U.S. POW's released by Vietnam was ever interrogated by the Soviets.' However, the evidence shows that McCain was lying and had first-hand knowledge that the charge was true, unless he had been programmed to forget it...." [American Free Press, supra]

As Testy John is the attack dog of some really sinister forces in America, there is not much chance that anyone will see his "spots change." He may be deranged. Consider:

4.) "Negative information written over the years about John McCain by those who know him best is immense, and it all is surfacing again with his run for the White House....Most fellow senators discuss his shortcomings only in private, of course, but a large number believe him to be psychologically unstable. Some, such as former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), and Sens. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) and Dick Shelby (R-Ala.) have related the times McCain screamed four-letter obscenities in their faces in the Senate cloakroom.
"'The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine,' said Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) Another who preferred to remain unnamed said, 'The man is unhinged. He is frighteningly unfit to be commander-in-chief.' " [American Free Press, supra)

Well, if it is any comfort, McCain's Jewish controls won't let him runamuck. He will be a sort of incarnate guided missile, blowing up Iran and other "rogue" states (assuming that "W" doesn't beat him to the kill.) If need be, Testy John can be poisoned, perhaps allowing the more stable personality of Mitt Romney, or some similar type, to ascend to the "colonial hotseat." At any rate it should be an interesting election.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

IS THE WHITE HOUSE NEW FRONT FOR ORGANIZED CRIME?

Although I haven't been attending to the chase for the White House too carefully so far, I believe that the media has settled on Senator John McCain for the Republicans and Obama/Clinton for the Democrats. In the latter case the issue isn't absolutely clear, but the media seem inclined toward Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton.

My hunch is that the race will finally be between Hillary and John, the Terrorist Slayer. I may be wrong, but the Clintons are experienced "in-fighters" and know how to suddenly and magically get the required votes. Mr. Billy Jeff Clinton has hung around C.I.A. "agents of change" long enough to reliably get the necessary number of votes. No doubt, his dear friend "Daddy" Bush could give him some pointers, if any were needed.

One of the most interesting things about the Clintons has been the "body count" that has tolled in the lengthy wake of their political careers. The great bulk of the suspicious deaths occurred in Arkansas, usually to people who got a peek at the drug-running into Mena, Arkansas, allegedly by contract operatives of the C.I.A., or who knew too much about the suspicious deaths or other unlawful acivities, such as "hits," the Whitewater speculations, and so on. However, from Ron Brown to Vince Foster the body count continued along with the Clintons to Washington, D.C.

For a long time I've speculated that "Murder, Incorporated" never ceased to exist, but rather it was a test project that was deemed a success and moved on up into the federal government, although not exclusively there. Meyer Lansky was the real leader of the syndicate, but he himself may have been a "pawn in the game." This, if true, would give more than a little hint at the shadowy power that informs and controls the Resident Evil, which itself controls the U.S.A. and spreads across the industrialized world, sucking the vitality out of the former nation-states.

It seems a good bet that the C.I.A. itself was infiltrated by the Syndicate spirit, judging from the not infrequent association with "organized crime" for this project or that, as well as its participation in opium and cocaine distribution. I believe that "protection" may have been another moneymaking racket.

Meyer Lansky had a daughter named Mira Lansky who married, it seems, someone named "Boland." Mira Lansky Boland was, and possibly still is, an attorney employed by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith ["ADL"], the alleged unregistered agent of the State of Israel (sic). The ADL operates, amongst other things, a spying section, which collects dossiers on people it believes are a "threat" to Jewry. Spying, lawsuits, and lobbying influential people and associations seem to be the top activities, but you never know the real purpose of "intelligence" operations. They don't seem to be benign at any rate.

All such groups as the C.I.A. and A.D.L. seem to hover in the background of the Clintons. They seem to know a lot of powerful folks all around the globe. There is a good bet such people are not benign, either. Billy Jeff Clinton is said to be a rapist, amongst other allegations. Funny thing is that he always seems to prevail. With such luck it isn't surprising that more charges of rape, suspicious deaths, etc., seem to keep cropping up. Billy Jeff Clinton is some sort of serial something. No one seems to want to say what. Maybe it's the body count factor.

As for Hillary, she was described by some journalist as an unreconstructed "Bolshevik." Also, she has been described as a "street-fighting radical," as I recall. If so, she's a rich one now, as she is said to be worth $50 million. She's come a long way since Don Tyson took her under his "chicken wing," to run a few thousand dollars into $100,000.

The Clintons weren't the first nor last cast of "shady" characters Americans have swooned over and put in the White House (assuming ballot counting is roughly honest). This leads to the question: Are the American people just a bunch of petty criminals who naturally are attracted to the "big bad boys" (and girls)? There is clearly something wrong--bad wrong--with the American culture. Need more evidence?

According to a lengthy article appearing in the American Free Press, written by well-known author Michael Collins Piper, Senator John McCain is the beneficiary of highly dubious power-brokers. The article states that "The Bronfmans are the 'godfathers' behind the political career of John McCain." The article continues: "McCain's father-in-law got his start as a top henchman for Kemper Marley, who, for 40 years until his death in 1990 at age 84, was the undisputed behind-the scenes political boss of Arizona. But Marley was much more than a machine politician. In fact, he was also the Lansky crime syndicate's top man in Arizona, the protege of a Lansky lieutenant, Phoenix gambler Gus Greenbaum."

Now,it should be noted that John McCain married Jim Hensley's daughter, Cindy. Jim Hensley worked for Kemper Marley, and it is said that he took "the fall" for Kemper during a federal liquor violations investigation. When Hensley got out of prison, Marley set him up in the beer distribution business, which is said today to be "worth $200 million." It is "what largely financed John McCain's political career. The support from the Bronfman-Marley-Hensley network was integral to McCain's rise to power."

As Elizabeth Taylor noted: "Money is the best deodorant." Well, certainly in America, it makes a lot of difference.

Interestingly, the lawyer handling the Hensley legal defense, at least in one major instance was later to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It was William Rehnquist "who handled Hensley's legal defense, forging the deal that set in motion Hensley's windfall (that now benefits McCain). Rehnquist was to be later "joined on the court by one of his own former girlfriends from Arizona, Sandra Day O'Connor."

This article is chock full of names such as Sam Bronfman, Meyer Lansky, Edgar Bronfman, the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Armand Hammer, Jack Ruby, Gus Greenbaum, Kemper Marley, Benjamin "Budsy" Siegel, Al Lizanitz,Jacobs and, of course, Jim Hensley (John McCain's father-in-law).

The article speculates that this association may be natural. According to it, "Doing Israel's bidding is a McCain family tradition. Following Israel's 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, resulting in the murder of 34 Americans, McCain's father, Adm. John McCain, was one of the key players inside the U.S. Navy helping cover up the deliberate nature of Israel's savage attack. 'Like father, like son' clearly means something when it comes to the McCains."

Yet, it would be wrong to say that John McCain is personally guilty of any unsavory deeds. His wife cannot be responsible for her father's legal mistakes, either. Nevertheless, can one dwell near sewage without picking up a hint of foulness? His innocence isn't known with certainty either. We must be brave enough to face the issues of our time. We know that a significant portion of the problems that Americans face can be met in the mirrors of scores of millions of homes each day. We have met the enemy: He is us! Babylon, mon amour.

Thursday, February 7, 2008

DUST

As I prepared to assume the position before my keyboard and punch out some words, I slowly became aware that my keyboard had a sort of hoary patina. I ran my finger along the surface and checked out my skin. There was a grey, fuzzy coat on the surface. What is this? I wondered.

As I looked about my little office, I saw that the surfaces of most everything bore a thin coating of this stuff. What's going on? I asked myself.

This office is sealed. Nothing can enter a window. The doorway, of course, might let in a some "particles" suspended in the air. Still, why doesn't it go to the floor. Reason would dictate that gravity would force these particles onto my carpet, where it could be vacuumed and removed, which is a process offered each Saturday, when good folks come in to attend to this particular matter. Yet, I find that dust has settled upon loftily situated furnishings and equipment about as evenly and thickly (or thinly, depending on perspective in these matters) as on those lowly situated.

I know, cold, that Mother Nature is not an equalitarian by her very --excuse the expression--nature. Mother Nature doesn't care who or what is high or low. It is true that ultimately "Mom" brings everyone and everything down low. Entrophy? Whatever! This cannot be the explanation.

I have a theory that there is a microcosmic force here on earth (and especially in sealed or almost sealed rooms) whereby dusty particles are "created" out of nothing. The force must be similar to the formation of stars. In space elemental units are forced together to build larger materials, which, again, are drawn together firmly, until the process reaches some kind of critical mass and bursts into starlight. Why can't the same process account for dust in enclosed areas? [It might even explain "spontaneous" combustion!]

This would also perhaps explain why dust isn't necessarily uniform. A quark here, a charm there, a missing meson over yonder, and before you know it, a distinct particle of dust is born. Folks, they aren't all the same.

I've seen dust particles that seemed incredibly sticky, while other layers of dust were like a mercury sheen. Some dust is gritty, while other dust is soft. And some dust you dare not even touch, due to its dangerous or repellant character. Breathe in the "wrong" kind of dust and it could be "curtains."

The point that I'm trying to make is that dust warrants a lot more study before we can confidently reach a modus vivendi. Remember what Zwingali said (paraphrased): "There's more under the heavens and upon this earth than your sciences dreamt of." And Trilby can vouch for that!

Monday, February 4, 2008

Drive-In Movies

Although the old "drive-in" movies seem to be a thing of the past, good ideas don't just completely go away. This is the way it is with the fabulous, really-big screen of the drive-ins. The convenience and opportunities (!) of the parked car at the movies could not simply "go away." The idea has been renovated, so to speak, and expanded in many new directions. Now, it is entirely possible for a "crusing" to include an in-car theatre, either by means of DVDs or downloading to a laptop a Netflix movie or some other film source. Even the cell phones are moving toward portable "drive-ins." As a matter of fact, a cruiser can make his home or a buddy's an alternate drive-in spot. Talk about the comforts of home! The options are there

The old drive-in movie lives in new venues. The old conveniences offered by the drive-in movie (and opportunities) have not been lost but relocated into modes congenial with contemporary technology. They will change some more in the future, but Friday and Saturday night cruising will still find a way to continue the convenience and fun of the old drive-ins. Life will find a way, tis said.

Deciding on a flick can be another issue all together. One CAN guess. I don't recommend guessing. There are a number of ways to get the scoop on a potential movie to see. You can hear from others by means of "scuttlebutt." There are also such options as radio, newspapers, and magazines. I don't use these myself. I go to the internet. One of the new sites I've come across is MoviePressLive (http://www.moviepresslive.com/). It's pretty kool, clowns!

Check it out, pick out a movie, and let the good times roll! Remember the number one rule at the old drive-in movies: Keep your stick high.