The Obama Administration has taken sufficient shape to say authoritatively that its going to boil down to more of the same. He has appointed some individuals possessed of mighty high opinions of themselves. Hence, the most interesting thing about the Obama presidency may be the personality clashes as the "same old-same old" gives birth to a gridlock of unsolvable problems. [It's not that findamental problems can't be solved, or at least lessened; the effort is doomed here by the certain application of variations of fixed ideas which are founded on occult speculation and which have never worked well--and never will.] These people are going to toward their beloved New World Order, but will become bogged down within a year and a half, Look then for the feuding and fussing to rear like a Hydra.
What the nation really needs is a Beowulf to take out a sword and inflict some mighty wounds on the complete monster of "New-World-Orderers" Then, maybe the problems of the nation can be addressed.
If Mr. Obama is to be believed, his thrust in the area of Levantine diplomacy will be to expand the war in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is absolutely the worst place on earth, other than the north and South Poles, for any outside military expedition to take place. With the possible exception of Genghis Khan and his horde, no outsider has ever been able to conquer and subdue these people and the terrain they call home. This will require the redeployment of U.S. military from Iraq to Afghanistan. That will allow a not-so-clandestine takeover by Shiite partisans, their struggle to produce the necessary strongman, and a bogus "republic" (usually incorrectly described as a "democracy") whose "president" is for life. The U.S. will end up borrowing money from the Chinese to support their Iraqi "democratic leader."
Since the "military - industrial complex" has been partners with the leaders of the Democrat - Republican Socialist International in perfecting the martial art of bankrupting its host country, the only country we are likely to have defeated after the conclusion of the Iraqi-Afghanistani conflicts is --- The United States of America. Personally, I hate to see Uncle Sam standing at a street corner holding a sign saying, "Will work for food," but, then again, folks say I'm just a clown.
As far as the economy is concerned, there is no solving of the periodic major economic dislocations, so long as the Jewish System is maintained. the nation's "wise men" could learn a little about good government if they considered Abraham Lincoln's "greenback" initiative. [see downnlaced's blog on subject at WordPress.com] As a matter of speculation, Lincoln's program is a major potential reason for his assassination. The "Moderns" however wish to pursue the Jewish System, aka, the Babylonian Woe. In this system usury is king - not cash. In this system there is never enough cash to cover the outstanding debt. Even a Harvard University PhD. out to be able to figure out the potential for disaster.
Human greed is a noteworthy source of trouble. When those suffering from this personalty defect are also leaders in the banking/financial community, then the condition is ripe for recessions and depressions. The Federal Reserve Act, which is U.S. legislation that will live in infamy, was enacted, it set up a system whereby U.S. currency enters the political economy through private banks (creating a money trust), rather than paid into the economy by enactment of needful laws funded through the Department of the Treasury and utilizing, or based upon, legal tender.
The beneficiaries of the Jewish System have hired an army of economist and lawyers to opine that the Jewish System is not flawless, but it is the best system that mankind has ever devised. All concepts inimical to the Jewish System of debt-mongering is dismissed as "simplistic." The major media invite the hireling economists and lawyer/politicians to "face the nation and explain the matter." See above for their opinion.
These people are likely to pull Uncle Sam out of the pit one last time before they introduce a recovery which will end the U.S government, as was understood by the old constitution. This doesn't represent an Obama triumph of change. It represents the utter Third-Worldization of America. The population of the U.S. may be 600 million by Obama's last year, if he gets two terms. Those bodies may be needed to shoulder the debt load, as well as to reliquify the U.S. monetary system through the issuance of credit to them to spend the needed money into the economy, which can then be greatly expanded by the "miracle" of fractional banking. Here comes the next "boom."
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Thursday, July 10, 2008
IRAN MON AMOUR?
Today, I was "clowning around" while listening to the "traffic" radio station for a little forecast of what lay ahead, when I cranked up my act and rolled out of my #1 tent. Now, it so happens that they provide "breaking news and analysis" as well. My timing was such that I "got in" at the beginning of an international intelligence analysis of the Iranians firing off a missile in a test.
This station's lead reporter ( named "J.J.") was giving a typically slanted report, utilizing insider information gleaned undoubtedly from three sources: the Israelis, the Arbusto (Spanish for "bush") Likudites, and that modern new and most dangerous hybrid, the "military-industrial-think tank-academic complex." The latter are comprised of "straw men" searching for a brain, and the Israelis are playing the "Wizard of Oz" to give them needed reassurances.
There is an immense "beating of the war-drums" in regard to Iran, orchestrated by the Israelis-World Jewry interests. Iran is relentlessly pictured as an "aggressor nation," as a "terrorist threat," as the "premier destabilizing element in Iraq," as a "threat to our troops," and, most important of all, a "threat to the very existence of Israel." Get real!
Israel is about the fourth most powerful nation in the world, considered strictly by itself. When you throw in its colony of U.S. Federal America, which controls the U.S.A., then you have the far and away most powerful force on earth. Add in the controlled or heavily- influenced Great Britain and its Commonwealth, the power gets even greater. The ruling circles of France are completely intertwined with Jewry, and France is competitive with the U.S. in "electing" Jewish leaders, partially Jewish leaders, and men whose hands have long been under the dominant Jewish "loincloth."
Germany is still an occupied country. Reparations to the Israeli state and Jews individually (paid in German money) have allowed "successful" reinvestment in the most pivotable business groups: media, entertainment, finance/real estate among others. This does bring influence, which can be brought to bear on German politicians, so much so, that only a few years back, The Washington Post broke away from "drum-beating" for unlawful entry by the "world community" into America (typically on "humane" grounds) to joyfully salute the 100,000 ,or so, Jews who have moved back into Germany, opening synagogues and making themselves "comfy."
The Russian Republic under Vladimir Putin did try to improve its relationship with Muslim nations in the Levant, which has been loudly bruited about (so there can hardly be a secret) that Russia might be a threat to the Israeli state, too. If not directly, then certainly indirectly. What is not stated is that about 25% of the population of the Israeli state is comprised of Jews from Russia, who are still Russian-speaking, culturally-influenced, have relatives living in Russia, and who are the primary forces behind the Marxist aspects of the Israeli state, including its atheism. The whole Zionist movement was composed of people who were as comfortable with Marxism as with Judaism. The former arose from concepts in the latter. In short, Vladimir Putin and the Israelis have had comfortable dialog from almost the "getgo," and these two nations eagerly seek trade relationships between one another. The Israelis have long had a very close working relationship with the Peoples Republic of China, regularly selling to the Chinese classified U.S. industrial and hightech information and hardware. Recently, the Israelis have developed a close relationship with the Indians. Both the rapid industrial-hightech development in India and China and the rise of the price of oil per barrel are unthinkable without American, European and Israeli Jews working to make it happen.
Given this sort of diplomatic power, why would anyone think that the relatively small and surrounded nation of Iran would, apparently for religio-ideological reasons--and welcoming its suicidal consequence, launch a nuclear genocide against the Israeli state? If you listen to Washington, D.C., news reports (or read them), you would suppose that it is a high probability event. Because this sort of assertion is "nuts," the Washington "newshounds, pundits, and eggheads" must assert that it is precisely because the Iranian leaders are "insane," that this threat is credible. Folks, they are the crazy ones. And possibly downright evil in the bargain. I'm not "clowning!"
The Israeli state possesses something in excess of 200 hundred nuclear devices. They may have twice that many. They have them in all sizes, as the Jews are very good at "tweaking" weapons, once they get their paws on them. This nation undoubtedly has an array of defensive missiles also. In so much as the U.S. produces such missiles, it is an "odds on bet" that the Israelis have gotten them, although it may have been given to them sub rosa. They may have obtained them from other countries as well. By now, they are in a strong position. Still, they do want to extend their property lines into Eretz Israel--the massive chunk of the Levant that allegedly was controlled by King David. Usefully, this turf contains quite a lot of oil. It is also a key strategic location between East and West.
Both the U.S. and the Israeli state have repeatedly bombed and invaded other countries. The U.S. has the world's most dubious record of having dropped atom bombs on two Japanese cities--Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The U.S. sees its "interests" all over the world, sees "madmen" everywhere, and attacks them everywhere. This allows its "control" to be a bit more discreet, attacking mostly neighbors, including Africans, which have had numerous destabling "events" over the last forty years. Of course, the Israelis aren't the only ones playing the African game of "Who's the strong man?" Both the U.S. and Israelis have a long record of fomenting a problem and then denouncing the surprised adversary. Clean hands? Get real!
When I was much younger, the U.S. began to "seep" vital military information to the U.S.S.R. The Soviets began to explode nuclear weapons. Alien intellectuals such as Henry Kissinger and ZBigBrother began to preach that the only safe course to take under these dangerous circumstances was "Mutually Assured Destruction." The U.S. and the Soviet Union should seek "parity" in nuclear weapons, so as to make an attack by either "suicidal." Peaceful coexistence could then follow. Hopefully, in time, the two nations would find their economic systems merging. Friendship would follow. This was the theoretical model bandied about.
Rather than seeing the U.S. and the Israelis bombing and invading other countries of the Levant on an never-ending basis (or until sufficient "puppets" can be installed and provided with secret police to enforce "democracy"), I'd like to see a certain "coolness" exhibited. Let Iran become the "designated opposition" (correlative of the U.S.S.R.), whose nuclear weapons force it and the Israelis into "peaceful coexistence."
There is one thing that I've learned in life: bullies like to bully folks much smaller and weaker than they. Equality of size usually causes bullies to "chill out." However, there is the possibility that the real problem is that the "forces of democracy" just can't tolerate diversity.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
STEP RIGHT UP, FOLKS! GENUINE H2O ON SELL!
It seems to me that as long as I can remember I've been drinking water for free. My Mom was pretty tight with the coins, and it would take a pretty good struggle to wring a coin from her paw. Now, don't get me wrong! My Mom wasn't a beast or anything. It's just that what she put away in the "cookie jar," she defended fiercely. You had to have a good reason to get any of it. Real good!.
Yet, my Mom never charged us kids any money for food, or for a place to sleep for the night, nor for water, whether utilized for bath or to drink. Mom understood that there were things that you just didn't have a right to charge for.
There was a time that this was a common belief. I speak here of the 1950s. Virtually everyone thought that water provision was a governmental function, and city waterworks were the norm. The idea that someone might try to create a scarcity of water so as to make a big profit entered no one's head.
Apparently, that's not the case anymore. How do I know? Well, sir, several years ago I read an article in the Wall Street Journal which described how "mergers and acquisitions" mogul, T. Boone Pickens of Texas, was investing in water rights in the great central aquafer that rests beneath the Plains States. I believe it has a fancy name, whether of palaeontology, geography, or marine science, I cannot recall. At any rate Mr. Pickens expected that water would be a commodity whose price was certain to rise. He planned on making a bundle of loot, as water scarcity and human demand compelled an upward trajectory for a "gallon of water."
Parenthetically, I'm not certain whether Mr. Pickens plans to sell water by the gallon, or, as with oil (of which he knows a lot), he plans to sell by the barrel.
I did receive in the mail an unsolicited stock "tout sheet" from a Mr. Jarret Wollstein, who seems to believe that "the biggest commodity boom in history is building steam as I write...That commodity is clean fresh water, and I can assure you, the smart money is getting in now..."
Now, Mr. Wollstein is a convincing, enthusiastic salesman. He cites logically that there are no new sources of fresh water. The world population is increasing, and as many of them as possible will try to come here. That means greater pressure on a limited resource. He also points out ecological considerations and water pollution with toxic chemicals. Science, he seems to feel, cannot rescue the situation in the limited time before the onset of the "Great Water Famine." He offers other reasons but lets stop here.
Who is "the smart money?" Well, of course, I've mentioned Mr. Pickens. One assumes he has some sharp associates in the project as well. Who else? According to Mr. Wollstein's tout sheet, the Queen of England warned in March about the "competition for fresh water by a growing population is itself becoming a source of potential conflict." Further, former Federal Reserve chairman, Allen Greenspan, according to this tout sheet, believes that a bad economic turndown is certain, but that the potential for water price increase makes it the new road to riches. Well, I paraphrase the sense of the quoted chairman.
If Greenspan were interested, its a good bet that the Rockefeller condominum of rich and savvy investors have already taken substantial stakes in water. As with the "art" purchased by the Rockefellers at a cheap price and later unloaded at stupendous profits and/or tax write-offs, so it may be with water. This would also explain the enthusiastic support of Latin peon migration into America by the Rockefeller crowd. This migration would generate a quantum leap in American water usage, starting the pressure upward for the water commodity. But Latins are not the only people pouring into America.
Now, if the Queen of England can perceive water shortages causing conflicts, do not suppose for a moment that the ruling circles in America don't understand that as well. So, why do they do all that they can to ease the travail of invading hordes of people? Why have they NEVER made any semi-serious effort to control our borders and regulate rationally (or at least according to the legislation of record) migration? Why have they always used rhetoric to stall any effective action? They wanted to create a fait accompli.
Since water shortages in America can only be hastened by unrestricted invasion whereby scores of millions of people clandestinely take their refuge in America, awaiting Jorge W. Arbusto's amnesty and "instant citizenship" proclamation. In gratitude they can only respond: "Hail, Caesar!"
Things at the highest levels of government operate with knowledge, purpose and vision. What is the vision of those who "pull the strings" of the Democrat-Republican Socialist Party? It is one of global order, created out of chaos. They are the ones who create the chaos. When the old structures lie in ruin, they will gather together like Nehemiah, Ezra, and the remnant of Israel to rebuild the world ("tikkun olam") They imagine this, as they have a zany understanding of the pertinent relationships.
It is difficult to know how to halt their madness. I recall seeing a roughly formed phalanx of "Weathermen" (or a similar Marxist group) walking down 15th street in Washington, D.C., about 1970 or '71, heading for The Mall area. Their phalanx was perhaps five across and twenty-five deep (as I now recall). Maybe more. I supposed them to be mostly Jewish. They got my attention, and I watched as they "marched," thrusting their fists into the air and chanting: "One more war! Revolution! One more war! Revolution!" I watched them turn the corner, marching toward Fourteenth Street, NW.
When I think back upon those Jewish lads, I believe that they offered an answer to America's looming problems. When leaders are deranged, corrupt, martial, dictatorial, and insatiably greedy, maybe it is time for a "Tea Party." If anyone can afford the water, that is!
Yet, my Mom never charged us kids any money for food, or for a place to sleep for the night, nor for water, whether utilized for bath or to drink. Mom understood that there were things that you just didn't have a right to charge for.
There was a time that this was a common belief. I speak here of the 1950s. Virtually everyone thought that water provision was a governmental function, and city waterworks were the norm. The idea that someone might try to create a scarcity of water so as to make a big profit entered no one's head.
Apparently, that's not the case anymore. How do I know? Well, sir, several years ago I read an article in the Wall Street Journal which described how "mergers and acquisitions" mogul, T. Boone Pickens of Texas, was investing in water rights in the great central aquafer that rests beneath the Plains States. I believe it has a fancy name, whether of palaeontology, geography, or marine science, I cannot recall. At any rate Mr. Pickens expected that water would be a commodity whose price was certain to rise. He planned on making a bundle of loot, as water scarcity and human demand compelled an upward trajectory for a "gallon of water."
Parenthetically, I'm not certain whether Mr. Pickens plans to sell water by the gallon, or, as with oil (of which he knows a lot), he plans to sell by the barrel.
I did receive in the mail an unsolicited stock "tout sheet" from a Mr. Jarret Wollstein, who seems to believe that "the biggest commodity boom in history is building steam as I write...That commodity is clean fresh water, and I can assure you, the smart money is getting in now..."
Now, Mr. Wollstein is a convincing, enthusiastic salesman. He cites logically that there are no new sources of fresh water. The world population is increasing, and as many of them as possible will try to come here. That means greater pressure on a limited resource. He also points out ecological considerations and water pollution with toxic chemicals. Science, he seems to feel, cannot rescue the situation in the limited time before the onset of the "Great Water Famine." He offers other reasons but lets stop here.
Who is "the smart money?" Well, of course, I've mentioned Mr. Pickens. One assumes he has some sharp associates in the project as well. Who else? According to Mr. Wollstein's tout sheet, the Queen of England warned in March about the "competition for fresh water by a growing population is itself becoming a source of potential conflict." Further, former Federal Reserve chairman, Allen Greenspan, according to this tout sheet, believes that a bad economic turndown is certain, but that the potential for water price increase makes it the new road to riches. Well, I paraphrase the sense of the quoted chairman.
If Greenspan were interested, its a good bet that the Rockefeller condominum of rich and savvy investors have already taken substantial stakes in water. As with the "art" purchased by the Rockefellers at a cheap price and later unloaded at stupendous profits and/or tax write-offs, so it may be with water. This would also explain the enthusiastic support of Latin peon migration into America by the Rockefeller crowd. This migration would generate a quantum leap in American water usage, starting the pressure upward for the water commodity. But Latins are not the only people pouring into America.
Now, if the Queen of England can perceive water shortages causing conflicts, do not suppose for a moment that the ruling circles in America don't understand that as well. So, why do they do all that they can to ease the travail of invading hordes of people? Why have they NEVER made any semi-serious effort to control our borders and regulate rationally (or at least according to the legislation of record) migration? Why have they always used rhetoric to stall any effective action? They wanted to create a fait accompli.
Since water shortages in America can only be hastened by unrestricted invasion whereby scores of millions of people clandestinely take their refuge in America, awaiting Jorge W. Arbusto's amnesty and "instant citizenship" proclamation. In gratitude they can only respond: "Hail, Caesar!"
Things at the highest levels of government operate with knowledge, purpose and vision. What is the vision of those who "pull the strings" of the Democrat-Republican Socialist Party? It is one of global order, created out of chaos. They are the ones who create the chaos. When the old structures lie in ruin, they will gather together like Nehemiah, Ezra, and the remnant of Israel to rebuild the world ("tikkun olam") They imagine this, as they have a zany understanding of the pertinent relationships.
It is difficult to know how to halt their madness. I recall seeing a roughly formed phalanx of "Weathermen" (or a similar Marxist group) walking down 15th street in Washington, D.C., about 1970 or '71, heading for The Mall area. Their phalanx was perhaps five across and twenty-five deep (as I now recall). Maybe more. I supposed them to be mostly Jewish. They got my attention, and I watched as they "marched," thrusting their fists into the air and chanting: "One more war! Revolution! One more war! Revolution!" I watched them turn the corner, marching toward Fourteenth Street, NW.
When I think back upon those Jewish lads, I believe that they offered an answer to America's looming problems. When leaders are deranged, corrupt, martial, dictatorial, and insatiably greedy, maybe it is time for a "Tea Party." If anyone can afford the water, that is!
Sunday, June 1, 2008
AUTHORITIES SUSPECT SUICIDE
Now, dodging bullets ain't no fun, but it beats getting hit. I believe that I'm on the same page with most people on this issue. It is with great reluctance (hey! I'm a clown!) that I bring up the subject of "politics and foul play" again. Still, with Hillary Clinton running for the Democrat nomination for President of the United States, and with her husband--so to speak--lurking in the shadows, one must expect bodies, some how or other, to start surfacing, "bobbing on the sea of political change." This couple has a track record which includes in its wake enough bodies to make a respectable professional football team. Well, I exaggerate a tad.
The recent news which has come to my attention of "nightriders" stiking the celebrated church of Barack Obama has caused much misgivings as to its source. I personally rule out the Ku Klux Klan. Yet, within the African-American community--even today--resides a residual fear of the Klan. Hence, for many African-Americans upon hearing that "death" stalked the congregation of Trinity United Church of Christ, an instant image of white-sheeted Klansmen, dragging an innocent member of the congregation to his doom entered their collective consciousness.
Part of a tragedy can be its generation of involuntary misgivings and suspicions. This is especially so when the tragedy involves a murder. Hence, three murders over a brief period of time has people looking over their collective shoulders. Any odd fellow immediately draws suspicious glances, as people are always certain that "evil" doesn't look like them.
Some readers may be scratching their heads and asking: What is he talking about? Let me give the basic data by means of a citation from a usually reliable source. Consider:
"The bombshell may involve the murder of Donald Young, a 47-year-old choir master at former Rev. Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ--the same congregation that Obama has attended for the past 20 years. Two other young black men that attended the same church--Larry Bland and Nate Spencer--were also murdered execution style with bullets to the backs of their heads--all within 40 days of each other, beginning in November 2007. All three were openly homosexual.
"What links this story to Barack Obama is that, according to an acquaintance of Obama, Larry Sinclair, Obama is a closet bisexual with whom he had sexual and drug-related encounters in November 1990. Further, Sinclair claims that Obama was friendly with at least two of these deceased parishioners, and that choir director Donald had contacted him shortly before being murdered from multiple gunshot wounds on December 23, 2007....
"An even more sinister aspect of this case is being investigated. According to Sinclair in an affidavit to the Chicago Police Department, Donald Young had informed him that he and Barack Obama were 'intimate' with each other....
"Another questionable Obama associate is openly homosexual. That person is Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig, who was listed during the 2008 campaign as being part of Obama's 'technology initiative.' " [AMERICAN FREE PRESS, June 2, 2008, p.13, Article by Victor Thorn, a well-known author]
The allegations against Barack Obama seem to depend heavily at this time on one man, Mr. Sinclair. The whole story calls to mind the fine political novel by Allen Drury entitled, ADVISE AND CONSENT, wherein a similar problem lurked. Is life imitating Art?
Regardless of the issue of sex--and Washington politicians are beyond blushing at any sexual act done by them or anyone else, the inconvenient fact of at least two homosexual members of Obama's congregation getting bullets to the back of the head must lead to undesirable questions, from the point of view of the Democrat's leading candidate for office.
For the American public--what with "surf's up!" and all--there may be minimal heed paid to the matter. It would tend to be "rolled up" in the issue: "Isn't that the strangest church? I'm so glad that Obama decided to leave it." No one will wonder if he took a smoking gun with him.
Did Obama's rather steely wife get rid of her husband's potential problems? Were these C.I.A. "hits" ordered by a) Billy Jeff Clinton or b) Daddy Bush? If Bush, the reason is obvious: help Sen. John McCain get elected, so he can continue "W's" war--maybe even let him carry the burden of "dropping the bomb" on Iran, so that history books can later make "W" into a lonely, courageous President standing tall against an implacable, evil foe, at a time when others were calling for "cut and run" policies. "W" --basically a man of peace--refused to use the bomb.
John McCain may be a "patsy." If he's wise, he won't select Jeb Bush to be his vice presidential running mate. "Patsies" die promptly, as if on cue.
The recent news which has come to my attention of "nightriders" stiking the celebrated church of Barack Obama has caused much misgivings as to its source. I personally rule out the Ku Klux Klan. Yet, within the African-American community--even today--resides a residual fear of the Klan. Hence, for many African-Americans upon hearing that "death" stalked the congregation of Trinity United Church of Christ, an instant image of white-sheeted Klansmen, dragging an innocent member of the congregation to his doom entered their collective consciousness.
Part of a tragedy can be its generation of involuntary misgivings and suspicions. This is especially so when the tragedy involves a murder. Hence, three murders over a brief period of time has people looking over their collective shoulders. Any odd fellow immediately draws suspicious glances, as people are always certain that "evil" doesn't look like them.
Some readers may be scratching their heads and asking: What is he talking about? Let me give the basic data by means of a citation from a usually reliable source. Consider:
"The bombshell may involve the murder of Donald Young, a 47-year-old choir master at former Rev. Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ--the same congregation that Obama has attended for the past 20 years. Two other young black men that attended the same church--Larry Bland and Nate Spencer--were also murdered execution style with bullets to the backs of their heads--all within 40 days of each other, beginning in November 2007. All three were openly homosexual.
"What links this story to Barack Obama is that, according to an acquaintance of Obama, Larry Sinclair, Obama is a closet bisexual with whom he had sexual and drug-related encounters in November 1990. Further, Sinclair claims that Obama was friendly with at least two of these deceased parishioners, and that choir director Donald had contacted him shortly before being murdered from multiple gunshot wounds on December 23, 2007....
"An even more sinister aspect of this case is being investigated. According to Sinclair in an affidavit to the Chicago Police Department, Donald Young had informed him that he and Barack Obama were 'intimate' with each other....
"Another questionable Obama associate is openly homosexual. That person is Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig, who was listed during the 2008 campaign as being part of Obama's 'technology initiative.' " [AMERICAN FREE PRESS, June 2, 2008, p.13, Article by Victor Thorn, a well-known author]
The allegations against Barack Obama seem to depend heavily at this time on one man, Mr. Sinclair. The whole story calls to mind the fine political novel by Allen Drury entitled, ADVISE AND CONSENT, wherein a similar problem lurked. Is life imitating Art?
Regardless of the issue of sex--and Washington politicians are beyond blushing at any sexual act done by them or anyone else, the inconvenient fact of at least two homosexual members of Obama's congregation getting bullets to the back of the head must lead to undesirable questions, from the point of view of the Democrat's leading candidate for office.
For the American public--what with "surf's up!" and all--there may be minimal heed paid to the matter. It would tend to be "rolled up" in the issue: "Isn't that the strangest church? I'm so glad that Obama decided to leave it." No one will wonder if he took a smoking gun with him.
Did Obama's rather steely wife get rid of her husband's potential problems? Were these C.I.A. "hits" ordered by a) Billy Jeff Clinton or b) Daddy Bush? If Bush, the reason is obvious: help Sen. John McCain get elected, so he can continue "W's" war--maybe even let him carry the burden of "dropping the bomb" on Iran, so that history books can later make "W" into a lonely, courageous President standing tall against an implacable, evil foe, at a time when others were calling for "cut and run" policies. "W" --basically a man of peace--refused to use the bomb.
John McCain may be a "patsy." If he's wise, he won't select Jeb Bush to be his vice presidential running mate. "Patsies" die promptly, as if on cue.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
EXPENDABLE POLITICIAN?
There have been a number of "trial ballons" released by Democrat "movers & shakers" in regard to a Democrat "Dream Ticket." According to these political thinkers, a Presidential/Vice-Presidential ticket comprised of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., would be unbeatable. All the weaknesses of Hillary in the perceptions of voters are more than covered by Barack Obama.
These political thinkers believe that, if Obama were to head the ticket, rather than Hillary, then Obama's weaknesses in terms of experience would be successfully exploited by the McCain team. Whoever joins McCain is likely to be a "meat ax" pro. (He may choose a Black to off-set charges of racism.) Therefore, a ticket headed by Obama (with Hillary in the Vice Presidential slot) would be more vulnerable. Even the "Junior" at the end of Obama's name suggests that maybe Obama has not really "grown" enough to be President of the United States.
More ominously, according to political realists, is the fact that a Presidential ticket headed by Obama invites assassination. Given the heavy support among the Black population of America for Barack Obama, such an assassination would result in social strife.
According to this line of thought, Hillary Clinton might be willing to play "second fiddle" for a while for the sake of William Clinton's candidacy, but would she be willing to wait out Barack Obama?
The long string of suspicious deaths in the wake of the Clintons' political rise cannot be a source of comfort to Obama supporters. The fact that Gerald Ford was shot at, while Nelson Rockefeller was Vice President, and the fact that Ronald Reagan was shot at, while George H.W. Bush was Vice President, point to the inherent danger to the President and to the care that must be taken in choosing a Vice Presidential running-mate.
These political thinkers believe that, if Obama were to head the ticket, rather than Hillary, then Obama's weaknesses in terms of experience would be successfully exploited by the McCain team. Whoever joins McCain is likely to be a "meat ax" pro. (He may choose a Black to off-set charges of racism.) Therefore, a ticket headed by Obama (with Hillary in the Vice Presidential slot) would be more vulnerable. Even the "Junior" at the end of Obama's name suggests that maybe Obama has not really "grown" enough to be President of the United States.
More ominously, according to political realists, is the fact that a Presidential ticket headed by Obama invites assassination. Given the heavy support among the Black population of America for Barack Obama, such an assassination would result in social strife.
According to this line of thought, Hillary Clinton might be willing to play "second fiddle" for a while for the sake of William Clinton's candidacy, but would she be willing to wait out Barack Obama?
The long string of suspicious deaths in the wake of the Clintons' political rise cannot be a source of comfort to Obama supporters. The fact that Gerald Ford was shot at, while Nelson Rockefeller was Vice President, and the fact that Ronald Reagan was shot at, while George H.W. Bush was Vice President, point to the inherent danger to the President and to the care that must be taken in choosing a Vice Presidential running-mate.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
FISH? OR ABOMINATIONS?
I had reason to glance at the Metropolitan section of The Washington Times today (03/06/08), as I planned a short break from toil. I headed for a small "library" nearby, where I hoped to get myself grounded in local doings. Immediately, I was struck by a color picture of various fish (sole on ice?), lined enticingly at a counter display at some seafood vendors or other.
The article which accompanied the photograph (by Joseph Silverman) was entitled: "SEAFOOD: HOW SAFE?" It was the project of one Karen Goldberg Goff, and was a consumer-oriented piece. The specific area of concern was mercury contamination of seafood. It began: "Information in the seafood world has become as muddy as the water during a thunderstorm..."
I thought that this was an inauspicious beginning, as it seemed to suggest that the writer was not going to be too plain herself, regarding the warning which presumably was to follow. However, I'm all in favor of public information being presented on issues affecting health. The article proceeded forward, touching on consumers, science, law and public policy. Hence, one does not feel "cheated," having spent a bit of time glancing through it.
The article does not offend me so much as a sort of statistical chart that adjoined it. This chart is fairly large (almost as large as the photograph, previously cited, under which it rested). The title of this chart was: "FISH FACTS." This seemed to me to be perfectly straight-forward and germane. In fact it even seemed to be a tad more specific than Ms. Goff's "seafood world."
Bitter was my disappointment! Under the title for the chart were three subtitles: "HIGH MERCURY," "MODERATE MERCURY," and "LOW MERCURY." Beneath the "MODERATE MERCURY" subtitle, one spies the caveat: "These fish contain moderate amounts of mercury:". Thereafter, one observes among the list of "fish" such specimens as: "Lobster" (crustacean) and "Mahi-mahi" (dolphin: mammal). Under the subtitle of "LOW MERCURY" one finds the caveat: "These types of fish contain the lowest amounts of mercury:". Beneath it are listed such "fish" specimen, as: "Clams," "Crawfish," Oyster," "Shrimp," and "Squid."
Really? Although few people today pay heed to ANYTHING Biblical, and, therefore, the fact that most of these singled out items are, in fact, dubbed "abominations" by Holy Scripture eludes the typical newspaper reader. Nevertheless, has zoology changed that much since I was a young student? Do modern teachers (or textbook writers) view inequality with such abhorence that they cannot teach any form of observable categorical distinction? Will some form of marine life be "offended" if excluded from the category of "fish?" Indeed! (Some modern "dictionaries" even list as secondary definitions of "fish" nearly anything one could "bring in" in a net (plastic bottles included).
Although, no doubt, the pedagogery has evolved from distinctions among observable life-forms to "almost sameness" in life-forms, this is not based on Charles Darwin's observations and theory of a natural selection at work, but rather a fine madness, which replaces materialism with abstractionism. This abstractionism is proclaimed "more essential" by these "con men" than the old observable criteria for establishing categories. One example of this that comes to mind, being the proclamation, ipse dixit, that we are all emanations from the "sea of being." In such a "sea" there cannot be any distinction between fish and crustacean, nor, indeed, fish and fowl. And so it goes with modern "schooling."
Folks, we've encountered this before. Hans Christian Anderson's tale of the "King Who Wore No Clothes" touches upon the ongoing duping of the world by these "tailors."
Well, if they win, and we are all eventually proclaimed to be fish, my only advice is: Stay low and keep your fins moving.
The article which accompanied the photograph (by Joseph Silverman) was entitled: "SEAFOOD: HOW SAFE?" It was the project of one Karen Goldberg Goff, and was a consumer-oriented piece. The specific area of concern was mercury contamination of seafood. It began: "Information in the seafood world has become as muddy as the water during a thunderstorm..."
I thought that this was an inauspicious beginning, as it seemed to suggest that the writer was not going to be too plain herself, regarding the warning which presumably was to follow. However, I'm all in favor of public information being presented on issues affecting health. The article proceeded forward, touching on consumers, science, law and public policy. Hence, one does not feel "cheated," having spent a bit of time glancing through it.
The article does not offend me so much as a sort of statistical chart that adjoined it. This chart is fairly large (almost as large as the photograph, previously cited, under which it rested). The title of this chart was: "FISH FACTS." This seemed to me to be perfectly straight-forward and germane. In fact it even seemed to be a tad more specific than Ms. Goff's "seafood world."
Bitter was my disappointment! Under the title for the chart were three subtitles: "HIGH MERCURY," "MODERATE MERCURY," and "LOW MERCURY." Beneath the "MODERATE MERCURY" subtitle, one spies the caveat: "These fish contain moderate amounts of mercury:". Thereafter, one observes among the list of "fish" such specimens as: "Lobster" (crustacean) and "Mahi-mahi" (dolphin: mammal). Under the subtitle of "LOW MERCURY" one finds the caveat: "These types of fish contain the lowest amounts of mercury:". Beneath it are listed such "fish" specimen, as: "Clams," "Crawfish," Oyster," "Shrimp," and "Squid."
Really? Although few people today pay heed to ANYTHING Biblical, and, therefore, the fact that most of these singled out items are, in fact, dubbed "abominations" by Holy Scripture eludes the typical newspaper reader. Nevertheless, has zoology changed that much since I was a young student? Do modern teachers (or textbook writers) view inequality with such abhorence that they cannot teach any form of observable categorical distinction? Will some form of marine life be "offended" if excluded from the category of "fish?" Indeed! (Some modern "dictionaries" even list as secondary definitions of "fish" nearly anything one could "bring in" in a net (plastic bottles included).
Although, no doubt, the pedagogery has evolved from distinctions among observable life-forms to "almost sameness" in life-forms, this is not based on Charles Darwin's observations and theory of a natural selection at work, but rather a fine madness, which replaces materialism with abstractionism. This abstractionism is proclaimed "more essential" by these "con men" than the old observable criteria for establishing categories. One example of this that comes to mind, being the proclamation, ipse dixit, that we are all emanations from the "sea of being." In such a "sea" there cannot be any distinction between fish and crustacean, nor, indeed, fish and fowl. And so it goes with modern "schooling."
Folks, we've encountered this before. Hans Christian Anderson's tale of the "King Who Wore No Clothes" touches upon the ongoing duping of the world by these "tailors."
Well, if they win, and we are all eventually proclaimed to be fish, my only advice is: Stay low and keep your fins moving.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
DODGING BULLETS: WHO'S IN DANGER?
The election year 2008 is one that may be looked at from many points of view. There are many ways to build statistical curiosities in regard to the electoral process and in regard to individual candidates for President. I thought that it might be interesting, given the track record in the United States, to consider the candidates most likely to be shot at and possibly killed.
The odds on favorite, if he had any chance at all of getting the nomination, would be Mr. Ron Paul.
Huge amounts of money have been spent to "shape" America, so that it will fit comfortably into the Pan American Super State, or Region. Judges and Legislators have been bought. Preachers and pedagogs have been enlisted. Big Business has its eyes "whirling and leaping" at the thought of "economy of scale" achieved by the Pan American Union (proposed currency: the "Pani").
With the Rockefeller condominium fully behind the "PAU" there seemed to be no reason to suppose that this union would not occur reasonably soon. Sure, there may be a few "rogue" leaders--such as Chavez--to "rub out" first. But the Bilderberger-Panglossian dream seemed at hand.
Then came Ron. Ron Paul. He comes talking about the Constitution, talking about eliminating the IRS, talking about defending OUR borders , rather than other countries' borders half a globe away from us, and talking about limited government. He warns of debt and the flaws in our money-creation system. This guy is clearly a danger to megalomania in our time! All debtmongerers are implacable foes. What does Ron Paul know about The New World Order? What does he know about The Global Syndicate? What does he know about Tikkun Olam? NOTHING!
He doesn't understand the "big picture" (the masses of people are incapable of ruling themselves and, hence, must be ruled with an iron hand). It is the burden of the rich and brainy murderers to save the world from itself. The tribute the people will pay for this service is a modest infinity of servitude.
Therefore, all talk about limited government is treason. The wage of treason is death. Therefore the rich and brainy murderers have a perfect right to kill Ron Paul. It's the only responsible thing to do. He has already earned it.
It is predicted, here, that if Ron Paul were able to mount a campaign as successful and threatening as Gov. George Wallace's campaign was, he would be gunned down.
Now, another potential presidential contender who might be gunned down is Barack Obama. The problem with him is that he may actually have some ideals hidden within that no one noticed. If he seemed to be a threat to the State of Israel, due to an even-handed approach to all countries (forgeting that some countries are more equal than others), then the wheels of change (assassination) may be set in motion. What if he tried to cut funds to the wealthy Israeli State, so as to have more money available to assist the pitifully poor nations in Africa? Such actions would immediately gain him the title of "rogue head of state," and he might well be assassinated by the Secret Service itself.
Parenthetically, rumor has it that the Rockefeller family security apparatus is staffed by the cream of the Secret Service. Once a Secret Service agent has proven that he is skillful in protecting the President, then he is ready to move up to the "big time" position of protectiing the Rockefellers.
Now, certainly no one expects Obama to be much more than an "absentee President," enjoying trips and fun. The inside view is that Obama will be somewhat like former mayor of Washington, D.C., Mr. Anthony Williams. Therefore, it is expected that he'll probably attend a lot of Nats games and catch some Wizard b-ball, visit brother masons in lodges around the world, while leaving the boring day-to-day White House work to his Vice President and White House staff.
These latter will most likely be selected by a Rockefeller "think tank" for their solid credentials, experience, global respect, etc. They will be good, patriotic men who can be trusted to fulfill the Bilderberger vision of a world community, controlled by people who had "the right stuff" (vast sums of money, tolerance toward the Enlightened, and an understanding that the world had limited resources, which could not be wasted on "idiotic useless eaters").
Naturally, then, if Obama proved to be Lincolnesque, his fate would likely be the same.
Now, there is one other caveat for Obama's candidacy. The long list of untimely dead that bob in the aether of the Clinton duo's political wake. For the Clintons "problems" often "go away" forever.
The odds on favorite, if he had any chance at all of getting the nomination, would be Mr. Ron Paul.
Huge amounts of money have been spent to "shape" America, so that it will fit comfortably into the Pan American Super State, or Region. Judges and Legislators have been bought. Preachers and pedagogs have been enlisted. Big Business has its eyes "whirling and leaping" at the thought of "economy of scale" achieved by the Pan American Union (proposed currency: the "Pani").
With the Rockefeller condominium fully behind the "PAU" there seemed to be no reason to suppose that this union would not occur reasonably soon. Sure, there may be a few "rogue" leaders--such as Chavez--to "rub out" first. But the Bilderberger-Panglossian dream seemed at hand.
Then came Ron. Ron Paul. He comes talking about the Constitution, talking about eliminating the IRS, talking about defending OUR borders , rather than other countries' borders half a globe away from us, and talking about limited government. He warns of debt and the flaws in our money-creation system. This guy is clearly a danger to megalomania in our time! All debtmongerers are implacable foes. What does Ron Paul know about The New World Order? What does he know about The Global Syndicate? What does he know about Tikkun Olam? NOTHING!
He doesn't understand the "big picture" (the masses of people are incapable of ruling themselves and, hence, must be ruled with an iron hand). It is the burden of the rich and brainy murderers to save the world from itself. The tribute the people will pay for this service is a modest infinity of servitude.
Therefore, all talk about limited government is treason. The wage of treason is death. Therefore the rich and brainy murderers have a perfect right to kill Ron Paul. It's the only responsible thing to do. He has already earned it.
It is predicted, here, that if Ron Paul were able to mount a campaign as successful and threatening as Gov. George Wallace's campaign was, he would be gunned down.
Now, another potential presidential contender who might be gunned down is Barack Obama. The problem with him is that he may actually have some ideals hidden within that no one noticed. If he seemed to be a threat to the State of Israel, due to an even-handed approach to all countries (forgeting that some countries are more equal than others), then the wheels of change (assassination) may be set in motion. What if he tried to cut funds to the wealthy Israeli State, so as to have more money available to assist the pitifully poor nations in Africa? Such actions would immediately gain him the title of "rogue head of state," and he might well be assassinated by the Secret Service itself.
Parenthetically, rumor has it that the Rockefeller family security apparatus is staffed by the cream of the Secret Service. Once a Secret Service agent has proven that he is skillful in protecting the President, then he is ready to move up to the "big time" position of protectiing the Rockefellers.
Now, certainly no one expects Obama to be much more than an "absentee President," enjoying trips and fun. The inside view is that Obama will be somewhat like former mayor of Washington, D.C., Mr. Anthony Williams. Therefore, it is expected that he'll probably attend a lot of Nats games and catch some Wizard b-ball, visit brother masons in lodges around the world, while leaving the boring day-to-day White House work to his Vice President and White House staff.
These latter will most likely be selected by a Rockefeller "think tank" for their solid credentials, experience, global respect, etc. They will be good, patriotic men who can be trusted to fulfill the Bilderberger vision of a world community, controlled by people who had "the right stuff" (vast sums of money, tolerance toward the Enlightened, and an understanding that the world had limited resources, which could not be wasted on "idiotic useless eaters").
Naturally, then, if Obama proved to be Lincolnesque, his fate would likely be the same.
Now, there is one other caveat for Obama's candidacy. The long list of untimely dead that bob in the aether of the Clinton duo's political wake. For the Clintons "problems" often "go away" forever.
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
MR. GROUCHY FOR PRESIDENT?
The thought of Israel Firster John McCain as President of the United States of America just doesn't sit well with me. It seems that a nation ought to be able to find someone for president who's out for America first. Supporters of John McCain say he is a patriot and supports America, as do most veterans. If he does support America, he most likely does in the sense of the "PanAmerican Union," favored by the Rockefeller condominium of powerful people and organizations.
As a long time disciple of Zionism's Trotskyites-turned-neo-conservatives, which crowd manifest itself like some form of advanced skin-cancer, dotting the surface of the Arbusto presidency, there can be little doubt what foreign policies he'll follow: Kill Israeli enemies, John, kill Israeli enemies! Given his alleged mental instability and outbursts of rage, his controllers may keep him on doses of thorazine most of the time--just as a precaution.
Some critics have, in fact, suggested that John McCain is a Manchurian Candidate of some sort. Although most ordinary American citizens who have had military experience look upon Testy John as a sound, manly patriot, this view is typically founded on their own fantasies, rather than facts and credible evidence. Consider some of the counter evidence:
1.) Dennis Johnson, a graduate of Officer Candidate School, was brought into Hanoi with a broken leg that was never treated. He saw McCain only a few times but heard much about his clean clothes, being showered and clean shaven and always with a few NVA officers during his stint at the "Hilton."
"He received special treatment and was sent to the hospital days after he arrived because he agreed to cooperate, and yes, he did give radio broadcasts for the NVA, not only to North Vietnam but broadcast over the camp speakers," Johnson said. "None of the other prisoners wanted anything to do with him because of these issues. It makes me sick to hear him called a war hero. He was worse than Fonda, for she was just an idiot, but McCain was supposed to be one of us." [American Free Press, February 18, 2008, p.11, art. by Pat Shannan]
I submit to you that if he is elected president, the day will soon arrived when men and women throughout this land will say: He was supposed to be one of us." The fact that the media has welcomed his advance on the White House and treated him kindly reflects McCain's widely known support of the Israeli cause (fighting "rogue states"--mostly non-docile states occupying Eretz Israel). His election would speed up the transition of a sovereign U.S.A. into an Israeli Colony, run by a governing Supreme Colonial Council. What is de facto may well become de jure under two John McCain administrations.
Mr. Mitt Romney has gotten on board with Testy John. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em! He may well hope to be the Vice President to McCain's President Grouchy. (This opens up the possibility of President Grouchy being replaced by President Groucho.) For surely the possibility of the "mean old man" dying in office hasn't eluded Mitt Romney.
Mr. Romney is a Mormon. This is a religion that, among other things, believes that the Anglo-Saxon people are descended from the Northern Kingdom of Israel and are, therefore, primarily the seed of Ephraim and Manasseh. This is probably correct. But what is truly bizarre about the Mormons is that the think that Jews are descended from the Judahites. Jews are known to be a mixed multitude. The seedlines of Esau, Canaan, and Ismael had found their way into the Southern Kingdom before the advent of Yahshua. At the time of Yahshua's tribulations, the High Priest Caiphas, the king Herod, and most of their priests and courtiers were Edomite Jews. No wonder some of them told Yahshua that they were of the seed of Abraham but had never been slaves!
The point of all this is to say that Mitt Romney will bend to the will of the Jews, as he tries to please them. Radio station WTOP is owned by Mormons. They have installed a vast crew of Jews to address the issues of the day. Needless to say, material omissions are the order of the day--every day. As an example, Mr. Ron Paul is hardly ever mentioned as a candidate for president. Mr. Tancredi was dismissed as a "one-issue" (immigration) candidate. WTOP loves the Latino invasion. Hardly a day goes by without scary references to Iran. Most "experts" sought out by this station are Jews or "terrorist-mongers."
Parenthetically, no one has ever explained to me how "democracy" can exist with minority rule. At one time Jewish-led political forces, including media, inveighed against the "tyranny of the majority" (democracy). Now that a Jewish dominated minority-rule government is in place, criticism of this situation brings forth hoodlums to decry "anti-semitism." In about 100 years Jews managed to immigrate from Europe and Russia and install themselves as practically the dictatorship of the "workers" (the term now must include those who had a job, or at one time wanted a job, as well as those who hold jobs now).
Don't look for "Christian" preachers or Catholic priests to come forth to preach the merits of our original form of government. To them goodies come from blessing Jews.
Therefore, the favorite of the neo-con Jews is John McCain. Therefore the favorite of Zionist "Christians" is likely to be McCain. He may go all the way.
Hold on there, partner. The Clinton gang is still riding, and if Hillary get the nod over Barack Obama, then some of John McCain's "dark secrets" from his POW days may come to the surface. As the Clintons are perfectly acceptable to many Jews (they both have Jewish antecedents, it seems,-- certainly Hillary), a changing of horses may occur in mid-stream, as the saying goes. Consider:
2.) "The Clintons have been talking with a former Soviet translator who was present at interrogations at several North Vietnam prisons because his father was in charge of the Hanoi Hilton, under the direction of the Soviet armed forces. One of these prisoners was McCain, shot down, wounded and captured on Oct. 26, 1967. The following July, McCain's father, Adm. J.S. McCain, was made commander of all military forces in the Vietnam theater. Upon learning this, the Vietnamese offered to release the younger McCain....
"Yet the offer of release would have to have been approved by the Soviet overseers of the North Vietnamese, and the translator does not recall any such offer being made. McCain's rejection of early release may have caused the offer to be dropped before high-level discussions.
"According to the translator, McCain made an 'accommodation' with his captors, and, in exchange, the translator's father saw to it that he was provided with an apartment in Hanoi and the services of two prostitutes. Upon returning to his prison cell, he would say he had been held in solitary confinement.
"That may be why so many of his fellow prisoners said later they saw so little of him at Hoa Loa Prison," [Jack] Wheeler suggested. [Wheeler is a Republican insider described as 'extremely well connected and a fascinating geopolitical analyst credited with being one of the architects of the Reagan Doctrine.'] [American Free Press, supra]
One cannot help but wonder if John McCain is a member of long standing in the Council on Foreign Affairs. It's long reach might have assured John McCain "boogie nights" in Las Orient Vegas.
3.) "In November of 1991, when Tracy Usry, the former chief investigator for the minority staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, testified before the Select Committee, he said the Soviets interrograted U.S. prisoners of war in Vietnam. McCain, incensed, rudely interrupted Usry several times, yelling that 'none of the returned U.S. POW's released by Vietnam was ever interrogated by the Soviets.' However, the evidence shows that McCain was lying and had first-hand knowledge that the charge was true, unless he had been programmed to forget it...." [American Free Press, supra]
As Testy John is the attack dog of some really sinister forces in America, there is not much chance that anyone will see his "spots change." He may be deranged. Consider:
4.) "Negative information written over the years about John McCain by those who know him best is immense, and it all is surfacing again with his run for the White House....Most fellow senators discuss his shortcomings only in private, of course, but a large number believe him to be psychologically unstable. Some, such as former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), and Sens. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) and Dick Shelby (R-Ala.) have related the times McCain screamed four-letter obscenities in their faces in the Senate cloakroom.
"'The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine,' said Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) Another who preferred to remain unnamed said, 'The man is unhinged. He is frighteningly unfit to be commander-in-chief.' " [American Free Press, supra)
Well, if it is any comfort, McCain's Jewish controls won't let him runamuck. He will be a sort of incarnate guided missile, blowing up Iran and other "rogue" states (assuming that "W" doesn't beat him to the kill.) If need be, Testy John can be poisoned, perhaps allowing the more stable personality of Mitt Romney, or some similar type, to ascend to the "colonial hotseat." At any rate it should be an interesting election.
As a long time disciple of Zionism's Trotskyites-turned-neo-conservatives, which crowd manifest itself like some form of advanced skin-cancer, dotting the surface of the Arbusto presidency, there can be little doubt what foreign policies he'll follow: Kill Israeli enemies, John, kill Israeli enemies! Given his alleged mental instability and outbursts of rage, his controllers may keep him on doses of thorazine most of the time--just as a precaution.
Some critics have, in fact, suggested that John McCain is a Manchurian Candidate of some sort. Although most ordinary American citizens who have had military experience look upon Testy John as a sound, manly patriot, this view is typically founded on their own fantasies, rather than facts and credible evidence. Consider some of the counter evidence:
1.) Dennis Johnson, a graduate of Officer Candidate School, was brought into Hanoi with a broken leg that was never treated. He saw McCain only a few times but heard much about his clean clothes, being showered and clean shaven and always with a few NVA officers during his stint at the "Hilton."
"He received special treatment and was sent to the hospital days after he arrived because he agreed to cooperate, and yes, he did give radio broadcasts for the NVA, not only to North Vietnam but broadcast over the camp speakers," Johnson said. "None of the other prisoners wanted anything to do with him because of these issues. It makes me sick to hear him called a war hero. He was worse than Fonda, for she was just an idiot, but McCain was supposed to be one of us." [American Free Press, February 18, 2008, p.11, art. by Pat Shannan]
I submit to you that if he is elected president, the day will soon arrived when men and women throughout this land will say: He was supposed to be one of us." The fact that the media has welcomed his advance on the White House and treated him kindly reflects McCain's widely known support of the Israeli cause (fighting "rogue states"--mostly non-docile states occupying Eretz Israel). His election would speed up the transition of a sovereign U.S.A. into an Israeli Colony, run by a governing Supreme Colonial Council. What is de facto may well become de jure under two John McCain administrations.
Mr. Mitt Romney has gotten on board with Testy John. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em! He may well hope to be the Vice President to McCain's President Grouchy. (This opens up the possibility of President Grouchy being replaced by President Groucho.) For surely the possibility of the "mean old man" dying in office hasn't eluded Mitt Romney.
Mr. Romney is a Mormon. This is a religion that, among other things, believes that the Anglo-Saxon people are descended from the Northern Kingdom of Israel and are, therefore, primarily the seed of Ephraim and Manasseh. This is probably correct. But what is truly bizarre about the Mormons is that the think that Jews are descended from the Judahites. Jews are known to be a mixed multitude. The seedlines of Esau, Canaan, and Ismael had found their way into the Southern Kingdom before the advent of Yahshua. At the time of Yahshua's tribulations, the High Priest Caiphas, the king Herod, and most of their priests and courtiers were Edomite Jews. No wonder some of them told Yahshua that they were of the seed of Abraham but had never been slaves!
The point of all this is to say that Mitt Romney will bend to the will of the Jews, as he tries to please them. Radio station WTOP is owned by Mormons. They have installed a vast crew of Jews to address the issues of the day. Needless to say, material omissions are the order of the day--every day. As an example, Mr. Ron Paul is hardly ever mentioned as a candidate for president. Mr. Tancredi was dismissed as a "one-issue" (immigration) candidate. WTOP loves the Latino invasion. Hardly a day goes by without scary references to Iran. Most "experts" sought out by this station are Jews or "terrorist-mongers."
Parenthetically, no one has ever explained to me how "democracy" can exist with minority rule. At one time Jewish-led political forces, including media, inveighed against the "tyranny of the majority" (democracy). Now that a Jewish dominated minority-rule government is in place, criticism of this situation brings forth hoodlums to decry "anti-semitism." In about 100 years Jews managed to immigrate from Europe and Russia and install themselves as practically the dictatorship of the "workers" (the term now must include those who had a job, or at one time wanted a job, as well as those who hold jobs now).
Don't look for "Christian" preachers or Catholic priests to come forth to preach the merits of our original form of government. To them goodies come from blessing Jews.
Therefore, the favorite of the neo-con Jews is John McCain. Therefore the favorite of Zionist "Christians" is likely to be McCain. He may go all the way.
Hold on there, partner. The Clinton gang is still riding, and if Hillary get the nod over Barack Obama, then some of John McCain's "dark secrets" from his POW days may come to the surface. As the Clintons are perfectly acceptable to many Jews (they both have Jewish antecedents, it seems,-- certainly Hillary), a changing of horses may occur in mid-stream, as the saying goes. Consider:
2.) "The Clintons have been talking with a former Soviet translator who was present at interrogations at several North Vietnam prisons because his father was in charge of the Hanoi Hilton, under the direction of the Soviet armed forces. One of these prisoners was McCain, shot down, wounded and captured on Oct. 26, 1967. The following July, McCain's father, Adm. J.S. McCain, was made commander of all military forces in the Vietnam theater. Upon learning this, the Vietnamese offered to release the younger McCain....
"Yet the offer of release would have to have been approved by the Soviet overseers of the North Vietnamese, and the translator does not recall any such offer being made. McCain's rejection of early release may have caused the offer to be dropped before high-level discussions.
"According to the translator, McCain made an 'accommodation' with his captors, and, in exchange, the translator's father saw to it that he was provided with an apartment in Hanoi and the services of two prostitutes. Upon returning to his prison cell, he would say he had been held in solitary confinement.
"That may be why so many of his fellow prisoners said later they saw so little of him at Hoa Loa Prison," [Jack] Wheeler suggested. [Wheeler is a Republican insider described as 'extremely well connected and a fascinating geopolitical analyst credited with being one of the architects of the Reagan Doctrine.'] [American Free Press, supra]
One cannot help but wonder if John McCain is a member of long standing in the Council on Foreign Affairs. It's long reach might have assured John McCain "boogie nights" in Las Orient Vegas.
3.) "In November of 1991, when Tracy Usry, the former chief investigator for the minority staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, testified before the Select Committee, he said the Soviets interrograted U.S. prisoners of war in Vietnam. McCain, incensed, rudely interrupted Usry several times, yelling that 'none of the returned U.S. POW's released by Vietnam was ever interrogated by the Soviets.' However, the evidence shows that McCain was lying and had first-hand knowledge that the charge was true, unless he had been programmed to forget it...." [American Free Press, supra]
As Testy John is the attack dog of some really sinister forces in America, there is not much chance that anyone will see his "spots change." He may be deranged. Consider:
4.) "Negative information written over the years about John McCain by those who know him best is immense, and it all is surfacing again with his run for the White House....Most fellow senators discuss his shortcomings only in private, of course, but a large number believe him to be psychologically unstable. Some, such as former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), and Sens. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) and Dick Shelby (R-Ala.) have related the times McCain screamed four-letter obscenities in their faces in the Senate cloakroom.
"'The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine,' said Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) Another who preferred to remain unnamed said, 'The man is unhinged. He is frighteningly unfit to be commander-in-chief.' " [American Free Press, supra)
Well, if it is any comfort, McCain's Jewish controls won't let him runamuck. He will be a sort of incarnate guided missile, blowing up Iran and other "rogue" states (assuming that "W" doesn't beat him to the kill.) If need be, Testy John can be poisoned, perhaps allowing the more stable personality of Mitt Romney, or some similar type, to ascend to the "colonial hotseat." At any rate it should be an interesting election.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
IS THE WHITE HOUSE NEW FRONT FOR ORGANIZED CRIME?
Although I haven't been attending to the chase for the White House too carefully so far, I believe that the media has settled on Senator John McCain for the Republicans and Obama/Clinton for the Democrats. In the latter case the issue isn't absolutely clear, but the media seem inclined toward Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton.
My hunch is that the race will finally be between Hillary and John, the Terrorist Slayer. I may be wrong, but the Clintons are experienced "in-fighters" and know how to suddenly and magically get the required votes. Mr. Billy Jeff Clinton has hung around C.I.A. "agents of change" long enough to reliably get the necessary number of votes. No doubt, his dear friend "Daddy" Bush could give him some pointers, if any were needed.
One of the most interesting things about the Clintons has been the "body count" that has tolled in the lengthy wake of their political careers. The great bulk of the suspicious deaths occurred in Arkansas, usually to people who got a peek at the drug-running into Mena, Arkansas, allegedly by contract operatives of the C.I.A., or who knew too much about the suspicious deaths or other unlawful acivities, such as "hits," the Whitewater speculations, and so on. However, from Ron Brown to Vince Foster the body count continued along with the Clintons to Washington, D.C.
For a long time I've speculated that "Murder, Incorporated" never ceased to exist, but rather it was a test project that was deemed a success and moved on up into the federal government, although not exclusively there. Meyer Lansky was the real leader of the syndicate, but he himself may have been a "pawn in the game." This, if true, would give more than a little hint at the shadowy power that informs and controls the Resident Evil, which itself controls the U.S.A. and spreads across the industrialized world, sucking the vitality out of the former nation-states.
It seems a good bet that the C.I.A. itself was infiltrated by the Syndicate spirit, judging from the not infrequent association with "organized crime" for this project or that, as well as its participation in opium and cocaine distribution. I believe that "protection" may have been another moneymaking racket.
Meyer Lansky had a daughter named Mira Lansky who married, it seems, someone named "Boland." Mira Lansky Boland was, and possibly still is, an attorney employed by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith ["ADL"], the alleged unregistered agent of the State of Israel (sic). The ADL operates, amongst other things, a spying section, which collects dossiers on people it believes are a "threat" to Jewry. Spying, lawsuits, and lobbying influential people and associations seem to be the top activities, but you never know the real purpose of "intelligence" operations. They don't seem to be benign at any rate.
All such groups as the C.I.A. and A.D.L. seem to hover in the background of the Clintons. They seem to know a lot of powerful folks all around the globe. There is a good bet such people are not benign, either. Billy Jeff Clinton is said to be a rapist, amongst other allegations. Funny thing is that he always seems to prevail. With such luck it isn't surprising that more charges of rape, suspicious deaths, etc., seem to keep cropping up. Billy Jeff Clinton is some sort of serial something. No one seems to want to say what. Maybe it's the body count factor.
As for Hillary, she was described by some journalist as an unreconstructed "Bolshevik." Also, she has been described as a "street-fighting radical," as I recall. If so, she's a rich one now, as she is said to be worth $50 million. She's come a long way since Don Tyson took her under his "chicken wing," to run a few thousand dollars into $100,000.
The Clintons weren't the first nor last cast of "shady" characters Americans have swooned over and put in the White House (assuming ballot counting is roughly honest). This leads to the question: Are the American people just a bunch of petty criminals who naturally are attracted to the "big bad boys" (and girls)? There is clearly something wrong--bad wrong--with the American culture. Need more evidence?
According to a lengthy article appearing in the American Free Press, written by well-known author Michael Collins Piper, Senator John McCain is the beneficiary of highly dubious power-brokers. The article states that "The Bronfmans are the 'godfathers' behind the political career of John McCain." The article continues: "McCain's father-in-law got his start as a top henchman for Kemper Marley, who, for 40 years until his death in 1990 at age 84, was the undisputed behind-the scenes political boss of Arizona. But Marley was much more than a machine politician. In fact, he was also the Lansky crime syndicate's top man in Arizona, the protege of a Lansky lieutenant, Phoenix gambler Gus Greenbaum."
Now,it should be noted that John McCain married Jim Hensley's daughter, Cindy. Jim Hensley worked for Kemper Marley, and it is said that he took "the fall" for Kemper during a federal liquor violations investigation. When Hensley got out of prison, Marley set him up in the beer distribution business, which is said today to be "worth $200 million." It is "what largely financed John McCain's political career. The support from the Bronfman-Marley-Hensley network was integral to McCain's rise to power."
As Elizabeth Taylor noted: "Money is the best deodorant." Well, certainly in America, it makes a lot of difference.
Interestingly, the lawyer handling the Hensley legal defense, at least in one major instance was later to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It was William Rehnquist "who handled Hensley's legal defense, forging the deal that set in motion Hensley's windfall (that now benefits McCain). Rehnquist was to be later "joined on the court by one of his own former girlfriends from Arizona, Sandra Day O'Connor."
This article is chock full of names such as Sam Bronfman, Meyer Lansky, Edgar Bronfman, the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Armand Hammer, Jack Ruby, Gus Greenbaum, Kemper Marley, Benjamin "Budsy" Siegel, Al Lizanitz,Jacobs and, of course, Jim Hensley (John McCain's father-in-law).
The article speculates that this association may be natural. According to it, "Doing Israel's bidding is a McCain family tradition. Following Israel's 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, resulting in the murder of 34 Americans, McCain's father, Adm. John McCain, was one of the key players inside the U.S. Navy helping cover up the deliberate nature of Israel's savage attack. 'Like father, like son' clearly means something when it comes to the McCains."
Yet, it would be wrong to say that John McCain is personally guilty of any unsavory deeds. His wife cannot be responsible for her father's legal mistakes, either. Nevertheless, can one dwell near sewage without picking up a hint of foulness? His innocence isn't known with certainty either. We must be brave enough to face the issues of our time. We know that a significant portion of the problems that Americans face can be met in the mirrors of scores of millions of homes each day. We have met the enemy: He is us! Babylon, mon amour.
My hunch is that the race will finally be between Hillary and John, the Terrorist Slayer. I may be wrong, but the Clintons are experienced "in-fighters" and know how to suddenly and magically get the required votes. Mr. Billy Jeff Clinton has hung around C.I.A. "agents of change" long enough to reliably get the necessary number of votes. No doubt, his dear friend "Daddy" Bush could give him some pointers, if any were needed.
One of the most interesting things about the Clintons has been the "body count" that has tolled in the lengthy wake of their political careers. The great bulk of the suspicious deaths occurred in Arkansas, usually to people who got a peek at the drug-running into Mena, Arkansas, allegedly by contract operatives of the C.I.A., or who knew too much about the suspicious deaths or other unlawful acivities, such as "hits," the Whitewater speculations, and so on. However, from Ron Brown to Vince Foster the body count continued along with the Clintons to Washington, D.C.
For a long time I've speculated that "Murder, Incorporated" never ceased to exist, but rather it was a test project that was deemed a success and moved on up into the federal government, although not exclusively there. Meyer Lansky was the real leader of the syndicate, but he himself may have been a "pawn in the game." This, if true, would give more than a little hint at the shadowy power that informs and controls the Resident Evil, which itself controls the U.S.A. and spreads across the industrialized world, sucking the vitality out of the former nation-states.
It seems a good bet that the C.I.A. itself was infiltrated by the Syndicate spirit, judging from the not infrequent association with "organized crime" for this project or that, as well as its participation in opium and cocaine distribution. I believe that "protection" may have been another moneymaking racket.
Meyer Lansky had a daughter named Mira Lansky who married, it seems, someone named "Boland." Mira Lansky Boland was, and possibly still is, an attorney employed by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith ["ADL"], the alleged unregistered agent of the State of Israel (sic). The ADL operates, amongst other things, a spying section, which collects dossiers on people it believes are a "threat" to Jewry. Spying, lawsuits, and lobbying influential people and associations seem to be the top activities, but you never know the real purpose of "intelligence" operations. They don't seem to be benign at any rate.
All such groups as the C.I.A. and A.D.L. seem to hover in the background of the Clintons. They seem to know a lot of powerful folks all around the globe. There is a good bet such people are not benign, either. Billy Jeff Clinton is said to be a rapist, amongst other allegations. Funny thing is that he always seems to prevail. With such luck it isn't surprising that more charges of rape, suspicious deaths, etc., seem to keep cropping up. Billy Jeff Clinton is some sort of serial something. No one seems to want to say what. Maybe it's the body count factor.
As for Hillary, she was described by some journalist as an unreconstructed "Bolshevik." Also, she has been described as a "street-fighting radical," as I recall. If so, she's a rich one now, as she is said to be worth $50 million. She's come a long way since Don Tyson took her under his "chicken wing," to run a few thousand dollars into $100,000.
The Clintons weren't the first nor last cast of "shady" characters Americans have swooned over and put in the White House (assuming ballot counting is roughly honest). This leads to the question: Are the American people just a bunch of petty criminals who naturally are attracted to the "big bad boys" (and girls)? There is clearly something wrong--bad wrong--with the American culture. Need more evidence?
According to a lengthy article appearing in the American Free Press, written by well-known author Michael Collins Piper, Senator John McCain is the beneficiary of highly dubious power-brokers. The article states that "The Bronfmans are the 'godfathers' behind the political career of John McCain." The article continues: "McCain's father-in-law got his start as a top henchman for Kemper Marley, who, for 40 years until his death in 1990 at age 84, was the undisputed behind-the scenes political boss of Arizona. But Marley was much more than a machine politician. In fact, he was also the Lansky crime syndicate's top man in Arizona, the protege of a Lansky lieutenant, Phoenix gambler Gus Greenbaum."
Now,it should be noted that John McCain married Jim Hensley's daughter, Cindy. Jim Hensley worked for Kemper Marley, and it is said that he took "the fall" for Kemper during a federal liquor violations investigation. When Hensley got out of prison, Marley set him up in the beer distribution business, which is said today to be "worth $200 million." It is "what largely financed John McCain's political career. The support from the Bronfman-Marley-Hensley network was integral to McCain's rise to power."
As Elizabeth Taylor noted: "Money is the best deodorant." Well, certainly in America, it makes a lot of difference.
Interestingly, the lawyer handling the Hensley legal defense, at least in one major instance was later to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It was William Rehnquist "who handled Hensley's legal defense, forging the deal that set in motion Hensley's windfall (that now benefits McCain). Rehnquist was to be later "joined on the court by one of his own former girlfriends from Arizona, Sandra Day O'Connor."
This article is chock full of names such as Sam Bronfman, Meyer Lansky, Edgar Bronfman, the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Armand Hammer, Jack Ruby, Gus Greenbaum, Kemper Marley, Benjamin "Budsy" Siegel, Al Lizanitz,Jacobs and, of course, Jim Hensley (John McCain's father-in-law).
The article speculates that this association may be natural. According to it, "Doing Israel's bidding is a McCain family tradition. Following Israel's 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, resulting in the murder of 34 Americans, McCain's father, Adm. John McCain, was one of the key players inside the U.S. Navy helping cover up the deliberate nature of Israel's savage attack. 'Like father, like son' clearly means something when it comes to the McCains."
Yet, it would be wrong to say that John McCain is personally guilty of any unsavory deeds. His wife cannot be responsible for her father's legal mistakes, either. Nevertheless, can one dwell near sewage without picking up a hint of foulness? His innocence isn't known with certainty either. We must be brave enough to face the issues of our time. We know that a significant portion of the problems that Americans face can be met in the mirrors of scores of millions of homes each day. We have met the enemy: He is us! Babylon, mon amour.
Thursday, February 7, 2008
DUST
As I prepared to assume the position before my keyboard and punch out some words, I slowly became aware that my keyboard had a sort of hoary patina. I ran my finger along the surface and checked out my skin. There was a grey, fuzzy coat on the surface. What is this? I wondered.
As I looked about my little office, I saw that the surfaces of most everything bore a thin coating of this stuff. What's going on? I asked myself.
This office is sealed. Nothing can enter a window. The doorway, of course, might let in a some "particles" suspended in the air. Still, why doesn't it go to the floor. Reason would dictate that gravity would force these particles onto my carpet, where it could be vacuumed and removed, which is a process offered each Saturday, when good folks come in to attend to this particular matter. Yet, I find that dust has settled upon loftily situated furnishings and equipment about as evenly and thickly (or thinly, depending on perspective in these matters) as on those lowly situated.
I know, cold, that Mother Nature is not an equalitarian by her very --excuse the expression--nature. Mother Nature doesn't care who or what is high or low. It is true that ultimately "Mom" brings everyone and everything down low. Entrophy? Whatever! This cannot be the explanation.
I have a theory that there is a microcosmic force here on earth (and especially in sealed or almost sealed rooms) whereby dusty particles are "created" out of nothing. The force must be similar to the formation of stars. In space elemental units are forced together to build larger materials, which, again, are drawn together firmly, until the process reaches some kind of critical mass and bursts into starlight. Why can't the same process account for dust in enclosed areas? [It might even explain "spontaneous" combustion!]
This would also perhaps explain why dust isn't necessarily uniform. A quark here, a charm there, a missing meson over yonder, and before you know it, a distinct particle of dust is born. Folks, they aren't all the same.
I've seen dust particles that seemed incredibly sticky, while other layers of dust were like a mercury sheen. Some dust is gritty, while other dust is soft. And some dust you dare not even touch, due to its dangerous or repellant character. Breathe in the "wrong" kind of dust and it could be "curtains."
The point that I'm trying to make is that dust warrants a lot more study before we can confidently reach a modus vivendi. Remember what Zwingali said (paraphrased): "There's more under the heavens and upon this earth than your sciences dreamt of." And Trilby can vouch for that!
As I looked about my little office, I saw that the surfaces of most everything bore a thin coating of this stuff. What's going on? I asked myself.
This office is sealed. Nothing can enter a window. The doorway, of course, might let in a some "particles" suspended in the air. Still, why doesn't it go to the floor. Reason would dictate that gravity would force these particles onto my carpet, where it could be vacuumed and removed, which is a process offered each Saturday, when good folks come in to attend to this particular matter. Yet, I find that dust has settled upon loftily situated furnishings and equipment about as evenly and thickly (or thinly, depending on perspective in these matters) as on those lowly situated.
I know, cold, that Mother Nature is not an equalitarian by her very --excuse the expression--nature. Mother Nature doesn't care who or what is high or low. It is true that ultimately "Mom" brings everyone and everything down low. Entrophy? Whatever! This cannot be the explanation.
I have a theory that there is a microcosmic force here on earth (and especially in sealed or almost sealed rooms) whereby dusty particles are "created" out of nothing. The force must be similar to the formation of stars. In space elemental units are forced together to build larger materials, which, again, are drawn together firmly, until the process reaches some kind of critical mass and bursts into starlight. Why can't the same process account for dust in enclosed areas? [It might even explain "spontaneous" combustion!]
This would also perhaps explain why dust isn't necessarily uniform. A quark here, a charm there, a missing meson over yonder, and before you know it, a distinct particle of dust is born. Folks, they aren't all the same.
I've seen dust particles that seemed incredibly sticky, while other layers of dust were like a mercury sheen. Some dust is gritty, while other dust is soft. And some dust you dare not even touch, due to its dangerous or repellant character. Breathe in the "wrong" kind of dust and it could be "curtains."
The point that I'm trying to make is that dust warrants a lot more study before we can confidently reach a modus vivendi. Remember what Zwingali said (paraphrased): "There's more under the heavens and upon this earth than your sciences dreamt of." And Trilby can vouch for that!
Monday, February 4, 2008
Drive-In Movies
Although the old "drive-in" movies seem to be a thing of the past, good ideas don't just completely go away. This is the way it is with the fabulous, really-big screen of the drive-ins. The convenience and opportunities (!) of the parked car at the movies could not simply "go away." The idea has been renovated, so to speak, and expanded in many new directions. Now, it is entirely possible for a "crusing" to include an in-car theatre, either by means of DVDs or downloading to a laptop a Netflix movie or some other film source. Even the cell phones are moving toward portable "drive-ins." As a matter of fact, a cruiser can make his home or a buddy's an alternate drive-in spot. Talk about the comforts of home! The options are there
The old drive-in movie lives in new venues. The old conveniences offered by the drive-in movie (and opportunities) have not been lost but relocated into modes congenial with contemporary technology. They will change some more in the future, but Friday and Saturday night cruising will still find a way to continue the convenience and fun of the old drive-ins. Life will find a way, tis said.
Deciding on a flick can be another issue all together. One CAN guess. I don't recommend guessing. There are a number of ways to get the scoop on a potential movie to see. You can hear from others by means of "scuttlebutt." There are also such options as radio, newspapers, and magazines. I don't use these myself. I go to the internet. One of the new sites I've come across is MoviePressLive (http://www.moviepresslive.com/). It's pretty kool, clowns!
Check it out, pick out a movie, and let the good times roll! Remember the number one rule at the old drive-in movies: Keep your stick high.
The old drive-in movie lives in new venues. The old conveniences offered by the drive-in movie (and opportunities) have not been lost but relocated into modes congenial with contemporary technology. They will change some more in the future, but Friday and Saturday night cruising will still find a way to continue the convenience and fun of the old drive-ins. Life will find a way, tis said.
Deciding on a flick can be another issue all together. One CAN guess. I don't recommend guessing. There are a number of ways to get the scoop on a potential movie to see. You can hear from others by means of "scuttlebutt." There are also such options as radio, newspapers, and magazines. I don't use these myself. I go to the internet. One of the new sites I've come across is MoviePressLive (http://www.moviepresslive.com/). It's pretty kool, clowns!
Check it out, pick out a movie, and let the good times roll! Remember the number one rule at the old drive-in movies: Keep your stick high.
Friday, January 11, 2008
EMERGENCIES
Emergencies are almost defined by their unexpected arrival. There are degrees, of course. I've never had a life-threatening one. I'm greatful for that. Mine tend to be more of the mini-emergency types. There seems to be some kind of scale by which hidden forces allocate the punishment to the undeserving as well as the deserving. Those who don't get thrown onto the operating table are likely to have to pay for their escape by a multitude of little, annoying emergencies. I am such a one.
I often blame GRAVITY for many of my accidents and for my generally klutzy demonstrations. For me this is not merely a scientific phenomenon. No, it borders on some kind of evil force out there. It singles people out to torment, often with a plethora of fumbles and droppings, which draw attention to the victim, as in: "What's his problem?" or "Clown!" [Now, that's getting personal.]
This evening, I was at my tiny office in Fairfax, VA. The property owner, Dino, has allowed the men's room on my floor to go for about two weeks "out of commission." This means that I have to go to the next higher or lower floor to reach a functioning restroom. I welcome the challenge of going up the steps and gaining a little exercise in the bargain.
However, tonight my sense of well-being was disturbed. As is often my fashion when I'm unrushed, I had taken a section of newspaper (in this case The Washington Post) with me, hoping to find an article about me in the Style section (a frequent spot for "hate crimes" to appear). [Ok, so I gave them some questionable advice; that's no reason to become anti-entertainer.]
My business was a serious one. I entered the cubbyhole, where the throne beckoned. I assumed the position of authority, which the occasion warranted. Naturally, I opened the newspaper section and began to scan for something interesting to read. Nothing! Even the advertisements were witless. Disgruntled, my sojourn ready to be terminated, I reached for the mysteriously contrived chamber wherein two rolls of paper usually are to be expected. Nothing! My fingers traced the entire interior of the housing, but they found nothing. What to do? I mused a bit angrily, my fingers tightening their grip on the newspaper. NEWSPAPER. I had brought along a solution to this emergency without premeditation. Another invisible hand had trumped the bringer of bad news (no pun intended). My mini-emergency had clandestinely been "fixed." Parenthetically, I haven't ruled out the existence of "guardian angels."
Incidentally, this is one of the few occasions when GRAVITY may be your friend.
In conclusion a potentially embarrassing situation was overcome, seemingly by a chance decision. I hope that I am wiser from this experience. I know I must live the rest of my life with the watchwords of the Boy Scouts before me: Be Prepared!
I often blame GRAVITY for many of my accidents and for my generally klutzy demonstrations. For me this is not merely a scientific phenomenon. No, it borders on some kind of evil force out there. It singles people out to torment, often with a plethora of fumbles and droppings, which draw attention to the victim, as in: "What's his problem?" or "Clown!" [Now, that's getting personal.]
This evening, I was at my tiny office in Fairfax, VA. The property owner, Dino, has allowed the men's room on my floor to go for about two weeks "out of commission." This means that I have to go to the next higher or lower floor to reach a functioning restroom. I welcome the challenge of going up the steps and gaining a little exercise in the bargain.
However, tonight my sense of well-being was disturbed. As is often my fashion when I'm unrushed, I had taken a section of newspaper (in this case The Washington Post) with me, hoping to find an article about me in the Style section (a frequent spot for "hate crimes" to appear). [Ok, so I gave them some questionable advice; that's no reason to become anti-entertainer.]
My business was a serious one. I entered the cubbyhole, where the throne beckoned. I assumed the position of authority, which the occasion warranted. Naturally, I opened the newspaper section and began to scan for something interesting to read. Nothing! Even the advertisements were witless. Disgruntled, my sojourn ready to be terminated, I reached for the mysteriously contrived chamber wherein two rolls of paper usually are to be expected. Nothing! My fingers traced the entire interior of the housing, but they found nothing. What to do? I mused a bit angrily, my fingers tightening their grip on the newspaper. NEWSPAPER. I had brought along a solution to this emergency without premeditation. Another invisible hand had trumped the bringer of bad news (no pun intended). My mini-emergency had clandestinely been "fixed." Parenthetically, I haven't ruled out the existence of "guardian angels."
Incidentally, this is one of the few occasions when GRAVITY may be your friend.
In conclusion a potentially embarrassing situation was overcome, seemingly by a chance decision. I hope that I am wiser from this experience. I know I must live the rest of my life with the watchwords of the Boy Scouts before me: Be Prepared!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
