YOUR HOUSE IS MY HOUSE!

I'm all for immigration. I'm all for order. Not surprisingly, I'm for immigration by design by U.S. representatives who represent the desire and will of the people.

Design is unthinkable without reasoning. Throughout America there are signs of design in its infrastructure. Some might be surprised to learn that our highways were actually designed. Our railroads were actually designed. Buildings are designed. Even a school's curriculum is designed. States even demand that a certain curriculum be taught as a standard. This cannot be done without reasoning what is the educational aim, how it is to be attained, and what are the best tools by which to achieve these goals. Yes, although the educational establishment hates to admit it, even they must think.

However, in regard to immigration, reasoning and standards don't apply. Certainly, pretexts are offered to excuse the chaos. What is going on?

One needs to go back to cryptic messages that illuminated individuals have left behind. Of primary interest is the expression: Out of Chaos, Order. This slogan appears on the "Jewel" of the 33rd degree Mason at the top of the central emblem as "ORDO AB CHAO." It includes other symbols, such as the triple, intertwined triangles and the serpent biting its own tail. Both are meant to connect to the Mystery Religions of old.

It is not my intention to delve into Masonic symbols in this blog. It is only to connect Masonry at its highest levels with the term, "Order Out of Chaos" or "Out of Chaos, Order." It is a factual statement that many of the presidents of the United States have been Masons. One such was Ronald Reagan, who is said to have been a 32 Degree Mason as president. Further, it is said that he became a 33 Degree Mason during his presidency. His vice president, George H.W. Bush, was a member of Skull & Bones. Whether he was a Mason or not would not affect the proposition that he was a committed occultist, which appears to be common enough at high White House circles, including cabinet secretaries.

Now, both of these men were leading the American nation at the time that Mexico was imploding, due to debt, and its currency was literally a "basket case." It is my belief that these two men, as well as the president of Mexico at the time, put into implementation a process for uniting North America. The union of Mexico, the United States and Canada would be sufficient to create this "northern regional government." The smaller Central American countries would be "sucked in" by the "gravitational force" of the monster government to the north. Occult import might be ascribed to the union, based on the intertwined triangles.

Parenthetically, about this time huge American industries began to refer - not to their American operations - but to their North American operations. Chance?

However speculative this may seem to people not very conversant with the "ruling circles" in America, the fact remains that the vast part of the modern immigration into America from South of the Border began at this time. No matter how loudly the resident citizens objected to the illegal immigration, this same leadership never did anything to stop it. Further, on at least two occasions during subsequent presidencies, amnesty was issued by the White House to all the illegal residents. No reasonable inference can be drawn but that the "ruling circles" were creating a demographic "fait accompli," exhibiting utter disdain for the will of the people on this issue.

Further, a Senor Salvador Borrego E., in his PUZZLING NEIGHBORS, demonstrated not only the relentless interference by the United States in Mexican affairs, but also that Freemasonry was frequently the guiding hand. He also showed the native Mexican Masonic influence in high circles in its government. Additionally, he showed that the president of Mexico at one relatively modern point had likened the U.S. and Mexico to two eagles flying together, the Mexican eagle following the American eagle. Besides the symbolic importance of eagles to Masonry, it also indicated the objective state of affairs: the Mexican Scottish Rite Lodge of Freemasonry was obedient to the American Scottish Rite Lodge, just as Grand Lodges are usually obedient to the United Grand Lodge of England.

The contemplation of union could only be planned after the United States had become a statist government in which all important policies were issue by the central government and in which private property was merely tolerated as vestigial but perhaps still useful.

To insure that the North American Union occurred on a timely basis, the "ruling circles" felt obliged to transform the United States's demography from overwhelmingly white European-derived to one which was composed of roughly equal minorities. The latter condition opened to the planners the option of instigating division, whereby one minority could be played off another. Increasingly, these planners saw the possibility of creating such chaos that the people would do anything for order. Then they would gladly step in and enact the long-planned steps, leading to a united world government by design.

It can be said with certainty that many of the leaders of both Mexico and the United States are secretly united in concept, although they may not seem to be. Here I speak also of academics, writers, polemicists, and "grass-root" leaders.

If one goes back to Chronicles and Kings in the Bible, one can see the policy of "moving people around." The House of Israel was moved out, and others were moved into the vacated space. It was done by design. However, one doesn't have to go back too far to see other examples of designed population movements. Consider:

"Soon after setting up the Communist International, Lenin, Stalin, Molotov, et al, realized that a vital requirement for world political warfare operations was to facilitate the emigration processes which would allow the movement and deployment of Communist political armies from one nation to another with a minimum of legal immigration delays. Coupled with the plan to establish freedom of emigration was a campaign to give unhampered rights for those foreigners already established to carry on subversive activities. In other words, complete freedom of emigration which in Bolshevik language was for the 'unhampered shifting of political armies' plus a campaign against deportation which would permit the Red agents to operate without danger of being removed from their sector of operation. This double-edged program became sloganized as the 'fight for political asylum' and 'the fight against deportation for political activity.' In other words, the problem was to move Red political soldiers freely into all sectors and to prevent those subversive aliens already intrenched from being thrown out of the country." [Col Archibald Roosevelt, CONQUEST VIA IMMIGRATION, pp.3,5]

Those who have witnessed the defense of the massive illegal entry into America could not fail to recall the Roman Catholic and Protestant clergy who went to the border to assist the illegal entry. Both religious groups have been significantly infiltrated by a potpouri of vile groups, such as Freemasons, Communists, and Neo-Uranians, who idealize the role of "agents of change." In the political parties there are now "spin-doctors" who are experts at avoiding strong points of argument by changing the terms, so that something else becomes the subject of debate. Material omission is virtually the rule of both politicians and press. Add to this mix the educational establishment, which has the task of producing "wasteland minds," and one sees not only a planned massive demographical change but a population massaged into thinking its normal. Most Americans think the desire to come to America is rather flattering to them. Neither the foolish nor the vain are likely to hold onto their inheritance. Consider:

"It is not just Mexican students in the American universities who are cooking up these kinds of ideas. Often they are led by Mexican faculty. Through the 'Chicano studies' programs on many campuses resentment against whites is taught causing these inevitable political consequences.

"For example, Charles Truxillo, who teaches Chicano Studies at the University of New Mexico, advocates a sovereign country called the 'Republica del Norte,' or Republic of the North, which would encompass the American Southwest.

"Truxillo said that the 'Southwestern Chicano and Norteno Mexicanos are becoming one people again.' This should be achieved 'by any means necessary,' using an overused, but no less menacing, quote by the late anti-white activist, Malcolm X.

"According to the Associated Press, Truxillo feels it is his job to develop a 'cadre of intellectuals' who will turn this concept into reality." [THE SPOTLIGHT, December 25, 2000, p.5, article by Eric Owens.]

Unfortunately, men such as Truxillo and Herbert Marcuse tend to collect devoted collections of misfits. Without such professors these misbegotten men and women might have settled for spray-painting "pig" on the walls of a luckless buildimg. Each of these "educated" people, like the living dead, seem able to bite a normal person and turn him into another living dead. Be that as it may, consider this:

"There is a movement growing in California and elsewhere in the nation of which - with help from the media - most Americans are entirely unaware but enjoys the support of both the California and federal governments.

"This phenomenon has come to be known as the Reconquista Movement (Spanish for 're-conquest'). It is highly organized and its main principal revolves around the recapture of the American Southwest by Mexican immigrants, both legal and illegal, and the overturning of the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo, signed by the United States and Mexico.

"As strange as this might sound to the average American, there is a growing popularity for this movement among the Mexican population, as demonstrated by the high-profile, and well-funded, Mexican activist groups involved....

"Consider this statement, if you will: 'California is going to be a Hispanic state, and anyone who doesn't like it should leave!'

"Now, this statement, ...is rather surprising when one considers that it was a public statement given by a Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient awarded by Bill Clinton in 1998.

"When asked if he had made the statement..., Mario Obledo followed up with: 'I did,' offering no explanation or apology.

"He then added, 'If they don't like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe....'

"Obledo said, '...it is the reality. We are going to take over all of the political institutions in California in the next five years.'" [THE SPOTLIGHT, Dec. 25, 2000, p.1, 4-5]

Well, it is safe to say that from Texas to California, a Hispanic majority will exist. Indeed, in the Gulf states generally there is that potential, led, of course, by Florida. This is due to an American political leadership that is de jure anti-white, a leadership among white clergy and educators whose "best hope" is to Rapture soon or blend in. The top brass in the military is either them, or takes it orders from them, so they are certainly not going to be supportive toward white people. They will announce a color-blind stance. With Jews pouring into American leadership positions across the board, aided and abetted by Freemasons (both groups are immune to "disparate results"), the future of independent, inveterate white people should recapitulate that of the Romanovs. Consider:

"Mario Obledo is the founder of a 'Latino' organization called the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF)...

"MALDEF was founded in 1968 with funding from the Ford Foundation....

"The Ford Foundation has funded quite an array of various non-white - and often anti-white - activist groups, from MALDEF and the National Council of La Raza (NCLR) or National Council of the Race, to the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, to name a few....

"MALDEF, like most 'Latino' activist groups, recognizes no real distinction between Americans of Mexican descent, and Mexican citizens. Although there is a marked difference in history, language and customs between the two groups, MALDEF is concerned primarily with race....

"When the president of Mexico, Ernesto Zedillo, came to America in July 1997, he paid a visit to this group and spoke before them in Chicano.

"At this meeting, he boasted: 'I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are a very, very important part of it.'

"California Gov. Gary Davis agreed. In 1999 Davis...clearly stated his vision for the future of California: 'In the near future, people will look on California and Mexico as one magnificent region.'

"This magnificent region is beginning to look more like a war zone. There have been several stand-offs between Mexican soldiers and the U.S. Border Patrol, when Mexican soldiers have crossed our border, and even shot at Border Patrol agents." [THE SPOTLIGHT, Dember 25, 2000, p.4, article by Eric Owens.]

It should be noted that the "Chicano" movement is distinct from Latino. It is Mexican. The "Race" or "people" being referenced are the descendants of the Aztecs. It does not really include Puerto Ricans, Cubans, and other Spanish-speaking groups, although common purpose against Norte Americanos may be deemed "wise community" and welcomed.

When I was a boy, the United States was about 90% white. The only "people problem" seemed to be how to assimilate or equalize the African American population. I gave up on that idea long ago, as the design of the "ruling circles" became more apparent. After experiencing a racially charged score of years, I never thought that I'd see substantial numbers of Africans immigrating into America, as well as African-derived Caribbean people. I realized that assimilation wasn't the issue; survival of a white people, per se, in America was the issue. As white people are already a minority (there is no reason to count those majority whites for whom continuance as a people is not an important issue), they can count on a struggle ahead.

The coming chaos is as much planned as is the design they have stored away somewhere for a post-chaotic world. The "ruling circles" have by now constructed very comfortable underground facilities to await the opportune moment to arise and restore order. Only a few days back, I heard a female media type speaking about Charley Manson and his "racist Helter-Skelter" cult. I have previously expressed the opinion elsewhere that the basic outline for his armageddon scenario was already being bruited about in covens and lodges in the 1960s, if not before, as a glimpse of things to come.

I don't enjoy propagating such matters, but the prospect of being a "guinea pig" is not too comforting either. Can you say "Swine flu?"

SYNAGOGUE AND STATE

Periodically, there are issued warnings in major media about the need to be vigilant about keeping barriers between the operations of the state and those of religions. Usually, these alerts are sounded by politicians or pundits. The more significant voices in a major media outlet presume to be peers with the president, senators, representatives, and justices. Hence, they are accorded the tribute of repetition by other, lesser pundits, as if these "Solons of the Press" were eminent figures.

Now, doubt not that these media outlets are vain. Why shouldn't they be? They regularly serve up material omissions while pushing a legislative act or court decision, and they still are referred by "educated" people as authority figures. Such people regularly cite such "great media voices" as The Washington Post as asserting this or affirming that.

The electing citizenry (nowadays includes anyone living or dead) in America are hopelessly foolish. They want to work within a system that has already excluded them from power and is relegating them to a status akin to serf. They have vague notions that a couple hundred years ago, some colonists rebelled against their exclusion from important decision-making in regard to the colonies by the King of England and his council and parliament.They cannot really connect to this. It has no relevance to them. In their ignorance and fecklessness these contemporary Americans believe they are "part of the action." This is true only in the sense that they will go down with the ship of state, screaming from the third-class section, where the Great American Serfs dwell.

The Democrat-Republican Central Committee has already passed American versions of the Marxist planks of the Communist Manifesto. They have overseen the extension of central authority over the "sovereign" states, even as they have "forked over" national sovereignty to the United Nations and a plethora of associated transnational organizations such as IMF, NAFTA, NATO, WTO, et al. The only reason that justified their deeds is the establishment of a "true world government."

Do any Americans ever stop to contemplate their role in such a government? If they have little, or no, role other than to vote for a Democrat version or Republican version of a Bilderberg-approved type of candidate, can they expect to participate in this electoral charade in a world government composed of a vast majority of people (admittedly serfs, also) who neither know or care about any principles of government thought wise by those men who fashioned our constitution with its Bill of Rights? Why have these men and women of Anglo-Saxon, Scott, Welsh and Celtic descent forfeited all that their fathers had accomplished for the promise of better times ahead, led by secretive, corrupt, and deranged men?

Thanks to "planned chaos," the country not only speaks a thousand tongues, but the public schools try to teach a hundred different tongues as "first choice" or "primary" language. Hyperbole? Perhaps, yet it is in the service of a clearer understanding of folly. Not only have the secret leadership worked on their "new tower of Babel," they have turned America into a giant cauldron for their witchery. A country favored by scores of millions of minds none of which think alike will be just so much "sound and fury" - a veritable animal farm. Where people do not think alike, there can be no meeting of the minds. Without a meeting of the minds upon principles which are just and which favor the general good, there can be no coherent government.

The latter state of affairs favors - even demands - secret government. When thus it is established, then "evil be thou my good" becomes a principle any pig can work with.

For many years these "low-dwelling slugs" (words of Joseph Alsop re John Dean) have fought to destroy Christianity from within and, more recently, from without. As the Israelitish Christian tradition of American Christianity waned and its power scattered, it was increasingly replaced by the quazi-Satanist movement of the Kenneth Copeland-Paul Crouch-Benny Hinn cult and Masonic bogus-Christianity.

Satanists love war because of the large numbers of deaths that attend it, which release proportionately great amounts of "energy" or "life force," which can be harnessed by the ocultic masters to "change the world." Not surprising, then, is that one can find many millions of such "Christians" demanding war against any state, or people, that the State of Israel (sic) fingers or that one ?(or more) of the Jewish world organizations fingers. The latter categories work to advance Israeli interests. The bogus "Christian" followers of the Satanists and/or of JohnHagee also work to advance the Israeli interests. Both the Israelis and the bogus "Christians" work to attenuate the influence of legitimate Christianity.

In the latter cause the outraged cry that Christianity is trying to intrude into the affairs of state will be heard, even though Christian influence is as noticeable as mane on a crocodile. The country has become incredibly corrupt. Presently, it is possible for a couple of men or a couple of women to marry and subsequently adopt children. Unable to bear children, perverted couples can create "dynasties" of perversion through the adoption and "turning" process. An adopted child may not have the natural inclination toward a "misdirected libido," but after years of "training" by his parents, will likely be a disturbed and possibly dangerous creature. Homosexual couples now look forward to having Kennedy-like dynasties. They speak of devoting themselves to public "service."

None of this would be possible except in a state where Israelitish Christian thought had neither weight nor many adherents.

Further, many "Christian" groups imagine themselves hovering soon in the air with the returning King and His heavenly host. They imagine themselves looking down on the death, mayhem, and corruption with casual disdain. It is a shockingly patronizing and vain vision.

All these things are reenforced by a withdrawal from "dirty politics."

To cry forth "alarms" about the dangers to the doctrine of the separation of church and state caused by any present branch of Christianity- or all - is to establish a straw man to frighten "bird-brains." This is the work of the major media. It is profoundly incorrect.

Yet, there is a virtual union of a religio-culture and state in contemporary America. I speak of the union of synagogue and state. By adroitly replacing the constitution with the Traditions of the Talmudist, Jewry has cleverly merged its law and the state of America. Such things need not be blatant. However, the sheer denseness of America's former leadership made it possible for Jewry to "flount" their ascendancy.

Justice Ginzburg is said to read from the Talmud daily. She is an apparently avid student of rabbinic thought. This isn't surprising, as the Talmud is the ONLY law for Jews. Here I am not referencing Moses; the important elements in Jewish thought come from "schools" led by revered figures, such as Rabbi Akiva.

The "Bible" is not studied very much, relative to these revered rabbis. Jews probably studied what Bible lessons that they did study to better position themselves on those occasions when they had to converse with Christian scholars on some element or other of the Bible. The rabbis knew that their "law" and rituals weren't Israelitish; they also knew that they could bluff the Christians, who assumed that these two "religions" were operating in the same universe.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn) is another important Jewish political figure who is said to be a great student of the Talmud. Capitol Hill has a substantial number of elected Jewish legislators. Rarely mentioned is the fact that the committees and sub-committees on both senate and house side have large numbers of Jews, who typically function as data-gatherers and researchers. Such positions and functions provide Jewry additional tools to affect legislation. This discussion on personnel could go further. However, this is a blog - not a tome.

Perhaps the most salient issue that arises is that there is no discussion of "disparate results" when the issue touches upon Jews. Inequality ceases to be an issue. All those well-paying jobs, one might suppose, would be divided according to categorical weight, based not on wealth but on numbers of people. No way, Jose!

What is the issue here? Senators and representatives want the "best minds in the country" to ponder important issues, leaving these pols freedom to chase after young pages and take junkets to exotic places. Jews are not shrinking violets on these matters. They saw the opportunity and took it. Jews flooded into graduate schools to become PhDs. Voila! Jewish "experts" fell upon Capitol Hill, providing timely manna for the intellectually-starved pols.

A key "religious" concept in Jewry is Tikkum olam ("repair of the world"). As Jews began to perceive that they themselves, collectively, were the "promised messiah," they naturally felt obliged to "make it happen." Harnessing their masonic dog teams, they began the long trek of circling the globe repeatedly, and, in the process, they created global smarming and schmoozing, while schlepping their strategems into the "raised consciousnesses" of all other peoples (or their "elite").


All this is to say that Jewish singularities of thought and ideological requirements related thereto assured that in America there could be no separation of synagogue and state.

So what is their "game plan?" Jews do have a messianic impel. It is ultimately a united world that is guided by their wise stratagems. They would still have, and live by, their law, according to however it is interpreted at any given point. Others would live under the Noahide laws. Idolatry, such as Christianity, would be extinguished. This Jewish messianic order would produce a kinder, gentler world. They wouldn't lie - would they?

Oh, yes! There was blood along the way. However, it was spilled for the greater good, doncha know?