Periodically, there are issued warnings in major media about the need to be vigilant about keeping barriers between the operations of the state and those of religions. Usually, these alerts are sounded by politicians or pundits. The more significant voices in a major media outlet presume to be peers with the president, senators, representatives, and justices. Hence, they are accorded the tribute of repetition by other, lesser pundits, as if these "Solons of the Press" were eminent figures.
Now, doubt not that these media outlets are vain. Why shouldn't they be? They regularly serve up material omissions while pushing a legislative act or court decision, and they still are referred by "educated" people as authority figures. Such people regularly cite such "great media voices" as The Washington Post as asserting this or affirming that.
The electing citizenry (nowadays includes anyone living or dead) in America are hopelessly foolish. They want to work within a system that has already excluded them from power and is relegating them to a status akin to serf. They have vague notions that a couple hundred years ago, some colonists rebelled against their exclusion from important decision-making in regard to the colonies by the King of England and his council and parliament.They cannot really connect to this. It has no relevance to them. In their ignorance and fecklessness these contemporary Americans believe they are "part of the action." This is true only in the sense that they will go down with the ship of state, screaming from the third-class section, where the Great American Serfs dwell.
The Democrat-Republican Central Committee has already passed American versions of the Marxist planks of the Communist Manifesto. They have overseen the extension of central authority over the "sovereign" states, even as they have "forked over" national sovereignty to the United Nations and a plethora of associated transnational organizations such as IMF, NAFTA, NATO, WTO, et al. The only reason that justified their deeds is the establishment of a "true world government."
Do any Americans ever stop to contemplate their role in such a government? If they have little, or no, role other than to vote for a Democrat version or Republican version of a Bilderberg-approved type of candidate, can they expect to participate in this electoral charade in a world government composed of a vast majority of people (admittedly serfs, also) who neither know or care about any principles of government thought wise by those men who fashioned our constitution with its Bill of Rights? Why have these men and women of Anglo-Saxon, Scott, Welsh and Celtic descent forfeited all that their fathers had accomplished for the promise of better times ahead, led by secretive, corrupt, and deranged men?
Thanks to "planned chaos," the country not only speaks a thousand tongues, but the public schools try to teach a hundred different tongues as "first choice" or "primary" language. Hyperbole? Perhaps, yet it is in the service of a clearer understanding of folly. Not only have the secret leadership worked on their "new tower of Babel," they have turned America into a giant cauldron for their witchery. A country favored by scores of millions of minds none of which think alike will be just so much "sound and fury" - a veritable animal farm. Where people do not think alike, there can be no meeting of the minds. Without a meeting of the minds upon principles which are just and which favor the general good, there can be no coherent government.
The latter state of affairs favors - even demands - secret government. When thus it is established, then "evil be thou my good" becomes a principle any pig can work with.
For many years these "low-dwelling slugs" (words of Joseph Alsop re John Dean) have fought to destroy Christianity from within and, more recently, from without. As the Israelitish Christian tradition of American Christianity waned and its power scattered, it was increasingly replaced by the quazi-Satanist movement of the Kenneth Copeland-Paul Crouch-Benny Hinn cult and Masonic bogus-Christianity.
Satanists love war because of the large numbers of deaths that attend it, which release proportionately great amounts of "energy" or "life force," which can be harnessed by the ocultic masters to "change the world." Not surprising, then, is that one can find many millions of such "Christians" demanding war against any state, or people, that the State of Israel (sic) fingers or that one ?(or more) of the Jewish world organizations fingers. The latter categories work to advance Israeli interests. The bogus "Christian" followers of the Satanists and/or of JohnHagee also work to advance the Israeli interests. Both the Israelis and the bogus "Christians" work to attenuate the influence of legitimate Christianity.
In the latter cause the outraged cry that Christianity is trying to intrude into the affairs of state will be heard, even though Christian influence is as noticeable as mane on a crocodile. The country has become incredibly corrupt. Presently, it is possible for a couple of men or a couple of women to marry and subsequently adopt children. Unable to bear children, perverted couples can create "dynasties" of perversion through the adoption and "turning" process. An adopted child may not have the natural inclination toward a "misdirected libido," but after years of "training" by his parents, will likely be a disturbed and possibly dangerous creature. Homosexual couples now look forward to having Kennedy-like dynasties. They speak of devoting themselves to public "service."
None of this would be possible except in a state where Israelitish Christian thought had neither weight nor many adherents.
Further, many "Christian" groups imagine themselves hovering soon in the air with the returning King and His heavenly host. They imagine themselves looking down on the death, mayhem, and corruption with casual disdain. It is a shockingly patronizing and vain vision.
All these things are reenforced by a withdrawal from "dirty politics."
To cry forth "alarms" about the dangers to the doctrine of the separation of church and state caused by any present branch of Christianity- or all - is to establish a straw man to frighten "bird-brains." This is the work of the major media. It is profoundly incorrect.
Yet, there is a virtual union of a religio-culture and state in contemporary America. I speak of the union of synagogue and state. By adroitly replacing the constitution with the Traditions of the Talmudist, Jewry has cleverly merged its law and the state of America. Such things need not be blatant. However, the sheer denseness of America's former leadership made it possible for Jewry to "flount" their ascendancy.
Justice Ginzburg is said to read from the Talmud daily. She is an apparently avid student of rabbinic thought. This isn't surprising, as the Talmud is the ONLY law for Jews. Here I am not referencing Moses; the important elements in Jewish thought come from "schools" led by revered figures, such as Rabbi Akiva.
The "Bible" is not studied very much, relative to these revered rabbis. Jews probably studied what Bible lessons that they did study to better position themselves on those occasions when they had to converse with Christian scholars on some element or other of the Bible. The rabbis knew that their "law" and rituals weren't Israelitish; they also knew that they could bluff the Christians, who assumed that these two "religions" were operating in the same universe.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn) is another important Jewish political figure who is said to be a great student of the Talmud. Capitol Hill has a substantial number of elected Jewish legislators. Rarely mentioned is the fact that the committees and sub-committees on both senate and house side have large numbers of Jews, who typically function as data-gatherers and researchers. Such positions and functions provide Jewry additional tools to affect legislation. This discussion on personnel could go further. However, this is a blog - not a tome.
Perhaps the most salient issue that arises is that there is no discussion of "disparate results" when the issue touches upon Jews. Inequality ceases to be an issue. All those well-paying jobs, one might suppose, would be divided according to categorical weight, based not on wealth but on numbers of people. No way, Jose!
What is the issue here? Senators and representatives want the "best minds in the country" to ponder important issues, leaving these pols freedom to chase after young pages and take junkets to exotic places. Jews are not shrinking violets on these matters. They saw the opportunity and took it. Jews flooded into graduate schools to become PhDs. Voila! Jewish "experts" fell upon Capitol Hill, providing timely manna for the intellectually-starved pols.
A key "religious" concept in Jewry is Tikkum olam ("repair of the world"). As Jews began to perceive that they themselves, collectively, were the "promised messiah," they naturally felt obliged to "make it happen." Harnessing their masonic dog teams, they began the long trek of circling the globe repeatedly, and, in the process, they created global smarming and schmoozing, while schlepping their strategems into the "raised consciousnesses" of all other peoples (or their "elite").
All this is to say that Jewish singularities of thought and ideological requirements related thereto assured that in America there could be no separation of synagogue and state.
So what is their "game plan?" Jews do have a messianic impel. It is ultimately a united world that is guided by their wise stratagems. They would still have, and live by, their law, according to however it is interpreted at any given point. Others would live under the Noahide laws. Idolatry, such as Christianity, would be extinguished. This Jewish messianic order would produce a kinder, gentler world. They wouldn't lie - would they?
Oh, yes! There was blood along the way. However, it was spilled for the greater good, doncha know?
Saturday, August 8, 2009
SYNAGOGUE AND STATE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment