NINE ELEVEN

“Oh, what tangled webs we weave, when first we practice to deceive!”

“By way of deception” [Mossad motto, alluding to the advice on strategy suggested by a Jewish sage]

America’s leadership contains circles that have been and are typically deceitful. They also seem to be well-integrated with both the British and the Israelis. They have set up innumerable organizations – often bearing titles suggestive of a global policy interest – to produce essays and orators to propagandize their perspective on major issues. Sometimes an issue they “push” may seem marginal, but they have always thought several steps ahead so that one can be certain that the seemingly marginal issue will tie importantly to a major issue in the future.

The major media, which has been owned or influenced by these same “masters of deceit,” frequently features one of their propagandists on “op ed” pages or their correlative on the major television networks. Crucial positions such as “managing editor” have almost always been in their hands so they have been able to filter out unwanted information that might confuse their readers or viewers.

Incidentally, the term “masters of deceit” was employed as the title of a book by F.B.I. Director J. Edgar Hoover. I believe that it was published in the ‘50s and dealt with the nefarious doings of communist agents, especially the U.S.S.R.’s, in America. Ironically, his book came out just prior to the big push to do a political make-over of the constitution and government of the United States of America without visible deconstruction. The structure need not be radically changed, if the words that constructed it are slyly changed by interpretation. 

Thus, the United States of America became a Marxist country by means of the suggestions of Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci, whose political strategy envisioned a transformation of the culture of a society, leading to a transformation of the society itself, rather than a bloody revolution and coerced imposition of Marxist-Leninist doctrines.

Parenthetically, if a nation state controls its wealth, the leadership of that nation – in effect – control its wealth. It would be normal to enjoy plenty in any society. While the ordinary workers may not have access to it, that fact would not preclude the leaders, who always do have access, from discreetly enjoying it. Such was the case in the U.S.S.R where the Marxist-Leninist leadership maintained stores filled with plenty, including luxury items, while the proletariat stores were notoriously bare of items.

All of this has been entered here as a supporting structure to my point about the deceitful American leadership circles.

Although these circles have conspired to create “events of terror” on a regular basis at least since the ‘80s, as can be witnessed by the Murrah building explosion in Oklahoma City, OK, the Ruby Ridge assault in Idaho, and the Waco holocaust, none of their previous nefarious deeds would matched their 9/11 attack.

The fact that all of the above were heavy-handed, senseless acts of carnage and were also characterized as acts of official cover-up suggest an ulterior motivation, which itself suggests they originated among theorists employed by the Resident Evil presently ruling America.

Not very many people in America have really thought too much about the label attached to the catastrophic attack on the World Trade Center’s twin towers. It was quickly labeled “9/11.” If one were to add these two numbers, then one would have the sum “20.” If one were to translate the sum “20” into Roman Latin, then one would have the sum “XX.” What is “XX?” It is the figurative form of “double cross.”

Most American know what the expression “double cross” means or suggests. But how many Americans know that intelligence groups have actually used the term “XX” to thinly disguise a disinformation stratagem? Would American ruling circles do the same?

Consider the British Double-Cross System, or XX System, used during World War 2 (“II”). According to Wikipedia it was an anti-espionage and deception operation of the British Security Service, usually referred to by its cover title MI5. It was used very effectively against the Nazi regime in Germany. It was overseen by the Twenty Committee, which was under the chairmanship of John Cecil Masterman. It was a name clearly chosen for its droll alternate meaning, which more rawly stated its purpose and modus operandi.

I propose and do believe that the choice of “9/11” both for calendar date of attack and for popular appellation was done by a powerful, secretive ruling circle in the United States, assisted by their propagandists in the academic-intellectual-creative complex, and that this group at once understood and relished its terror event’s disguised “XX” meaning. I further believe that both the British and Israeli intelligence service(s) were aware of the planned “9/11” event and were involved to some unknown extent.

The full future ramifications of the “9/11” attacks will be manifested in the sweet bye-n-bye.